Summary

Trump’s transition team is reportedly mired in infighting at Mar-a-Lago, with factions clashing over control and strategy for his return to the White House.

The Washington Post detailed heated disputes, including shouting matches, name-calling, and physical altercations.

Three key factions have emerged: one led by Donald Trump Jr. and JD Vance, another by Trump ally Susie Wiles, and a third by Linda McMahon.

High-profile confrontations involve figures like Boris Epshteyn, Elon Musk, and Vance, highlighting tensions over Cabinet picks and leaks, further fracturing the team.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Three key factions have emerged: one led by Donald Trump Jr. and JD Vance, another by Trump ally Susie Wiles, and a third by Linda McMahon.

    No, that’s one faction: Trump’s. This is how he does business. Creates infighting, brokers a deal, comes out ahead.

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This happened throughout his first term as well as within the Trump Organization before he sought public office. His management style seems to be one where the boss pits everyone against each other to keep all would-be dethroners at bay. It’s not the best way to distribute the keys of power, but it is a good way to keep anyone from challenging the leader even in the slightest.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is exactly how Hitler ran his government. People think the Nazis were hyper-efficient. In truth the German reputation of being a highly regimented and strict society well predates the Nazis, the Nazis themselves were highly disorganized and really inefficient in most everything they did.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Nazis came into power in the early 1930s. It required them to lose a major war in 1945 and the death of their cult leader before they stood down.

        It appears that one of our greatest mistakes was allowing the Nazis to become a comedy trope (like the Producers), showing them as incompetent buffoons. In reality, they were a decade-long threat that made the world extremely uncomfortable. Nazis don’t fall over just because they’re “the bad guys”, and outside of some more-powerful superpower rising up and kicking their ass its not so clear how to make them fall.


        That being said: Trump and the MAGAs are NOT Nazis and thank god for that. They are Americans and ultimately I tie them closer to the Know Nothings or Whigs.

        The Presidents of the 1800s caused major atrocities over the Native Americans, and the USA then had a century of anti-Native American / bad-guy Indian savages to deal with. Of course, we won those battles so it wasn’t such a big deal but the atrocities remain a black spot in our moral history. Given the trajectory of what we’re witnessing here, I expect a similar thing for MAGA.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Turning the Nazis into a comedy trope was something that predated WW2. There were people who actively mocked the Nazis because they thought their pomp and rallies were ridicules.

          Post-WW2 they received more humanizing depictions than the Soviets ever had. The comedy trope as you mentioned didn’t really start until the 1960s with Hogan’s Heroes that portrayed the Nazis as utter buffoons. The Producers was made by Mel Brooks, who made it his life’s mission to turn Hitler into a figure of mockery and ridicule.

          The reason why he did that is because he believed that by making Hitler look like the ultimate comedic jackass, no one would ever take Hitler and his ideology seriously ever again. He did have a point. His satires of Hitler were never co-opted by Nazis, who frequently co-op anti-Nazi satire and propaganda as their own (look at American History X. It is a serious critique of white supremacy, but the protagonist’s handsome and muscular appearance and his attitude turned him into a Neo-Nazi icon).

          The main issue is that people don’t understand why Hitler was evil, why Hitler was dumb, and more over… how similar Hitler was to many other third-world dictators and tyrants that we condemn without a second thought. It was that he inherited the German state, which was far more advanced technologically and economically than other countries and thus actually stood a chance at doing the crazy shit they set out to do.

          Mussolini had wide ambitions, but they were not targetted at Western European powers, and also he seriously lacked the capabilities of carrying out his ambitions (his attempt at wooing the Muslim world over to his side failed in a comical fashion). This is why Mussolini is often remembered as a goofball idiot and not the tyrant that he actually was towards his fellow Italians. Mussolini’s family was not tarnished by his misdeeds and have been active in Italian politics. His great-grandchildren hold office and are still running and no one seems to care much for it there.

          It was also very well-known that when fascism comes to American it will not resemble the Nazis in Nazi Germany. Sinclair Lewis noted that in his 1935 novel It Can’t Happen Here that fascism will come in an American guise. HE is misquoted as saying that it will come carrying a cross and wrapped in an American flag. He didn’t say that, but he definitely meant it.

          The same thing is going on in Germany, with the AfD rising in power and might even be able to take office. It won’t be like Germany in the 1930s and 40s, but it will be a Neo-Nazi state.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s an overlooked way to combat fascism. Get them to eat each other in a corner rather than taking out their rampant sexual frustrations on the rest of us.

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’ll only stall. Eventually, one rule of thought will win out even if it takes months of firings and cycling out of people he already appointed.

        Eventually, they’ll settle out.

        • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s what happened in his first term (and apparently within his business for years). Trump’s management style appears to be: gather sycophants and yes men, orchestrate drama to pit everyone against each other, stay in power due to the instability caused by the infighting. No one considers challenging the king if the court is too chaotic.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Wow. It’s almost like when you hire nothing but back stabbers and grifters, you get people who only know to back stab and grift.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Following the Watergate scandal, ‘-gate’ became the suffix to label subsequent scandals.

    I propose stories associated with Trump, and other stupid scandals, be encrusted with the suffix ‘-a-Lago’.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It consolidates it, but that means the in-group is smaller. Fascisim is a death cult in the long run as it has to keep everyone focused on an enemy, but they have to invent a new enemy if they defeat that one.

        https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/umberto-eco-ur-fascism

        For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle. Thus pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. It is bad because life is permanent warfare. This, however, brings about an Armageddon complex. Since enemies have to be defeated, there must be a final battle, after which the movement will have control of the world. But such a “final solution” implies a further era of peace, a Golden Age, which contradicts the principle of permanent war. No fascist leader has ever succeeded in solving this predicament.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Except, if I am getting what you are saying right, no. That would make things worse. That would result in President Vance and if you got rid of President Vance, you get President Johnson.

        To quote Jello Biafra, “I’d rather have a dumb Nazi than a smart Nazi.”

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The part that saves it is that Vance can’t generate the kind of support that Trump does. He’d definitely fuck stuff up, but fascism is so much about The Guy that anybody but Trump would not be able to build militant support. That is, the kind that makes reporters afraid to say anything bad about the Administration.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is why the Media helped Trump win. So they will have endless stories like this.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I see a lot of takes like “The media learned nothing from 2016/2020.”

      My enby in Christ, our blessed ever perfect capitalism means they can NEVER ‘learn’ or even ‘care’ about what is best for the country. It will only ever be about the click$.

    • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I hated it so much last time. Too stressful. When Biden won in 2020 it felt like a weight was lifted off me.

        • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe not for him, as he’s not a traditional late night host, but for the rest of them, definitely. It’s all they talked about for four years.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because it was all they COULD talk about for 4 years. He monopolized the media landscape, pushing out much better material left and right.

            Besides, being funny about something that’s already both a joke and a tragedy is NOT anywhere near as easy as you might think.

            Especially not when millions of people will send you death threats if you go to far and millions of people will stop watching if you go too easy.

            And that’s not even mentioning the real possibility that he might make mocking him illegal.

            • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              No need to bootlick talk show hosts. There is always plenty going on in the world. They choose to discuss him every night. To say that’s all they could talk about is gross hyperbole. They are lazy. The writers are lazy. Trump is some of the lowest hanging fruit in the last 50 years.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                No need to bootlick talk show hosts

                If that’s what you think was going on, I hesitate to read the rest of your comment… 🤦

                There is always plenty going on in the world

                Yeah, but talk show hosts have to stay relevant. They have to make jokes about what people are talking about.

                What people are talking about is mainly determined about what legacy media covers and what goes viral on social media.

                If both are dominated by whatever bullshit the Mango Mussolini is doing, the talk shows gotta talk about what the Mango Mussolini is doing.

                To say that’s all they could talk about is gross hyperbole

                No, it’s exaggeration for simplicity to make a point without getting bogged down in irrelevant details

                They choose to discuss him every night.

                THAT’S hyperbole, though. Hypocrisy too, by the looks of it.

                They are lazy. The writers are lazy

                More hypocrisy with your lazy and narrow minded jumping to conclusions 🙄

                I was right. I shouldn’t have read on.

                • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  The fact that you’re defending late night talk show hosts so hard is odd. Do you work for one of the shows?

                  No one is putting a gun to their head and forcing them to discus the orange man. It’s a choice. This can’t be argued.

    • Gumby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Only if it ends with Abraham Lincoln coming back from the dead and mowing every single one of them down with an AR-15 and then ending with a line like “Party of Lincoln, my ass!”

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Nah. They needed trump, still.

      “Economy showing signs of recovery” didn’t help the GqP at all and it needed to be swapped out for something valueless that sells papers. Thus, trump.