Avicenna

I came here with the same question but now I realize that if I ask it I will only get replies explaining me what Z-score is and not Z-score of what. So I will just assume it is sth akin to h-index. Still does not make much sense to me as to why average h-index papers “don’t survive” (i.e get rejected because no one is interested lets say) where as negative ones do.

Most of Trump’s sentences resemble the Monte Carlo generated texts of oldie times. Remember the ones where it seemed like someone having an aneurysm is talking? Those ones.

test: assert I before II

good to go

it is an exothermic reaction, it releases money

Fresh water mussels with a side order of tortured soul, yumm

I mean to be fair she looks completely ok with a government rounding up immigrants or anyone slightly fair skinned really and deport them without any due process. So shallowness might not be just in their marriage. This is not a fight between races, this is a fight between classes. As long as you are rich you are fine no matter what your sex, gender or race is.

I would normally be sympathetic to their stand except earlier this year when this first started, they called on Trump to use all available political leverages to prevent this and protect free speech. Calling on Trump to protect free speech is just absolutely ridiculous.

If I had to choose between a group who made fun of death of someone because of his extremely bigoted, sexist and racist views vs a group of people who have fun with the idea of sending people at large to gas chambers because of their race, I think the choice is clear. Next time come with a better “what about”.

You are just spreading xenophobia against bots!

Wait till you talk to LinkedIn people interested in Quantum Physics

So palantir analyses pretty sensitive data, for instance health data from NHS. They may not be able to share the data itself but are there any safeguards against them using the knowledge they gain from these analyses to consult health insurance companies for outrageous amounts of money so insurance companies can fuck people even more by grinding stats?

Same goes for them analysing surveillance data. Any safeguards against Palantir consulting fascist political parties on results of these analyses so they can more efficiently carry out fear mongering?

I think it is more of a threat along the lines of “if you tax me more, I will play even dirtier to keep my wealth, lay off people in companies I am a major shareholder of etc and therefore economy will be worse”. And politicians know that many people will blame the government for any damage to the economy and they therefore bend the knee not to lose their seats. Everything really would be better if people understood who their real enemy is.

I am not sure the other side shuns vaccination because they are afraid of autism. I am sure there are many among them who would not terminate a pregnancy even if they found out in time that their child would have down’s syndrome (I don’t condemn or condone this, just giving an example). They only don’t vaccinate because “the libs tell them to”, so more like a cult fanaticism behaviour. I think it is that simple and stupid not even something pragmatic.

anything goes when you are in a cult

Lol I’m loving how this all turned into a “who can produce the absolutely most outrageous bullshit praise for Charlie Kirk” contest like the winner is gonna get to sit on daddy Trump’s lap. Very heavy cult vibes, but one of those based on religion where the leader sexually molests members for favours.

*50 %

In 2025, any “left” party which can not produce a unanimously supportive statement for LGBTQ+ rights within a day of being asked can get fucked.

Eh god knows what happened there and how probably some moles catalysed the situation but people should have been able to get over themselves to unite for the greater good. If indeed it was the case that one wing of the party was heavily oppressing the other, then I really can’t tell how a practical solution could be found to that. But destroying the party from within rarely seems like a good option, especially given that Reform UK is gaining so much traction thanks to the seat warmer Keir Starmer.

Ah this reminds me of a right wing demonstration in Turkey infront of the Dutch Embassy because of something bad Mark Holland had said about Turkey.

lol this bill is just a bait from the republicans as it seems. If you vote yes, you vote for making Kirk a hero, if you vote no you vote against stopping political violence (the other part of the bill condemns political violence) so republicans can say “see left supports political violence”. If you are a democrat you lose in both cases (which is the better of two bad outcomes is debatable). Fucking politics is and has always been a game of thrones serving the interests of the powerful but it is even more so with republicans in charge.