Source (Bluesky)

Transcript

recently my friend’s comics professor told her that it’s acceptable to use gen Al for script- writing but not for art, since a machine can’t generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sister’s screenwriting professor said that they can use gen Al for concept art and visualization, but that it won’t be able to generate a script that’s any good. and at my job, it seems like each department says that Al can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

It’s only ever the jobs we’re unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation. The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts, and occupations, the more we realize that gen Al will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don’t.

  • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Generalists can be really good at getting stuff done. They can quickly identify the experts needed when it’s beyond thier scope. Unfortunately over confident generalists tend not to get the experts in to help.

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      This makes a lot of sense. A good lesson even outside the context of AI.