• megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 天前

    It is true that she didn’t have enough time to put together a viable platform, but if Biden had dropped out early enough for her to develop a viable campaign and platform, that would have meant a primary, and it’s doubtful she would have won that primary.

    Even if she had won that primary, it’s still doubtful that she would have assembled a viable platform and campaign. The political cliques she was aligned with were diametrically opposed to the kind of policies that would have made a viable platform.

    A break from neoliberal politics was necessary. But basically all of the institutional pressure for Biden to drop out came from neoliberal diehards who were pissed at him for deviating from that line slightly, the age thing was mainly just an acceptable cover story for the insiders. Haris got her chance by appealing to those groups and thus she was never going to challenge those interests.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 天前

      Oh she never in 100 years would have won a primary. She was like rank 8 of 10 in the 2020 primaries, people do not like her

      • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 天前

        I voted for her but don’t like her.

        Primarily, because of her stance on prison labor which is just slavery with extra steps.

        • khepri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 天前

          Yeah, I voted for her too, as I would have voted for Biden or for a fucking Funko doll over Trump.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 天前

        The voting public didn’t care about her, but she had good connections with relevant instructional actors. That’s why she was relevant. People like trump will keep winning until the Democratic Party, as a political institution, cuts those neoliberal actors out of the coalition. If the party doesn’t, democracy will fail in America, or they will be replaced by some new party, or both.

        People complaining about voters not choosing her over trump, or people not being motivated by voting for her, are just feeding in to that dark future. The only way out is standing up and demanding better candidates, refusing to accept the lesser of two evils.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 天前

      Imagine not voting for the black lady because she has to prove herself worthy while a criminal senile pedophile can go on insane demented rants for a year and win by default.

      There’s a lot of cope happening in America, and everyone is pointing fingers, but the fact is 2/3 of the electorate either voted for fascism or didn’t bother to vote against it.

      But go ahead and blame everyone and everything other than the fact that American culture is fundamentally rotten and most people either want fascism or at least don’t care about whether it happens.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 天前

        Well that’s a gross over-simplification. It certainly wasn’t her and the DNC’s long history of clearly ignoring the needs of the people who want to vote for them while regularly reaching for “moderate” votes. It definitely wasn’t her disconnection from Walz while hanging out with Liz Cheney for a significant amount of time.

        People don’t see her as any form of significant opposition to the far-right but they do see opposing the DNC as something worth doing and I’ve come around to supporting them there. It is not their fault that the Republicans won, anyoderately sane and intelligent people would have laughed him into oblivion but the US threw tens of millions of people at Trump.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 天前

        Harris ran on a campaign of “everything is fine, status quo as usual.”

        If you’re drowning in the ocean and you see two life boats, one is rowing away from you saying “you’re not drowning, everything is fine” and the other has a guy reaching his hand out that you have personally seen sink 5 other live boats he was on, you’re still going to swim towards the guy holding his hand out.

        One person seemed to at least acknowledge that a lot of people were barely surviving, and maybe, maybe try his time, he would actually help which was better odds than the person who made it clear they definately wouldn’t.

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 天前

        regardless of what it says about America wtf did the democratic establishment run a corpo black woman against a populous racist white guy?

      • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        Ehhhh I think it will come out the election results were mostly faked or influenced in an illegal way. I don’t think people voted this way. But Trump had allies with voting machines.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 天前

      Hitler was appointed chancellor by Hindenburg, who ran as a left wing centrist. And at the time they were fighting against a bloc of left wingers and a small group of communists. Sound familiar?

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 天前

        Hindenburg, who ran as a left wing centrist.

        There wasn’t anything “left-wing” about Hindenburg. He ran on maintaining the status quo - a status quo that was a rapidly deteriorating depression with very high unemployment. He represented business interests and was never going to do any of the major reforms that would’ve been necessary to save the republic (if anything could).

        The social democrats decided to throw unconditional support to these centrist parties for the sake of stability. They didn’t seem to have any actual understanding of why conditions were deteriorating, why extremism was rising, or what needed to be done in order to address it - all they could ever think to do was support the bourgeoisie in order to buy time - in order to sleepwalk into fascism.

        Naturally, as Hindenburg represented bourgeois interests, he was always going to side with the far-right against the left, if he had to choose. And, since conditions were declining with no plan to actually fix anything, he was always going to end up in the position of having to choose.

        I would say that there are similarities, though, yes.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    6 天前

    The fact of the matter is in an election where [ANYONE] vs FASCIST is the choices…

    YOU FUCKING VOTE FOR ANYONE.

    I honestly don’t believe this is still a conversation!! My god you people are not just determined to repeat the mistakes of the past- you’re running headlong right towards it!

    So fucking embarrassing.

    • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 天前

      It’s hard to blame the voters in the light of recent events.

      Voters just handed the Democrats an insane mandate. Ignoring the voters and caving in to the fascists a week later sends a very clear message, “We don’t care about your vote.”

      Actions speak louder than words.

      • hatorade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 天前

        We voted, they caved into Republicans.

        We voted, they “had a stroke and suddenly are evil.”

        We voted, they gave up.

        But we’re the bad guys for learning from mistakes and not them, with teams of think tanks and backings of billionaires for polling dat?

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 天前

      I’m gonna be devil’s advocate here for a moment. I followed Mamdani’s campaign closely and I think he nailed it on the spot. You had two politicians running whereas one lied that he’ll reduce prices and make America great again and the other… did nothing for the most part. From the eyes of the average voter Kamala promised nothing but the status quo, and they wanted change. That’s how Dem strongholds flipped red during this election and how a lot of them went back to blue for the mid term elections. If she told her donors to get stuffed and worked for the working class instead of exploiting the working class she would’ve won.

      What a mess we live in. Both options will fuck you over, only one of them will do it with lube.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        It was a terrible campaign spoken to people who where/are hurting telling them they where actually in fact doing great.

        It was worse then doing nothing, saying it was mostly nothing is being kind. Once again they just assumed they would win and forgot that people looking for any help will swallow lies over the safer status quo choice. That is why when the big man gamble blew up in their face they vote blue again. The real issue is this is why the dems never have to change, they don’t even oppose the other side anymore, they just wait to have their turn.

        Watching this mess is just infuriating, seeing the endless exceptionalism and team based bullshit more so.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 天前

      Of course there were many foolish voters out there but it’s not good enough for a candidate to be not Donald Trump. The reality is that many people will stay home when they see dirty corporate politicians running for office. And you can blame the people all you want, but that doesn’t change reality, and they’ll still stay home.

      I think what’s embarrassing is your approach. You saw 2016 and 2024 and you still haven’t learned from either of them. It turns out that people vote or don’t vote for a variety of reasons, and a simplistic approach like yours is a failed approach.

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 天前

        And you can blame the people all you want, but that doesn’t change reality, and they’ll still stay home.

        The problem with this logic, is that these are the options you have, and the DNC doesn’t care about this, so you, as not the DNC have 2 options. Support the democrats, or support trump.

        All of the whining in the world won’t change this.

        I think what’s embarrassing is your approach. You saw 2016 and 2024 and you still haven’t learned from either of them.

        Why are you talking to that other commenter as if they are the DNC? They’re not the ones responsible for their political strategy.

        and a simplistic approach like yours is a failed approach.

        They’re taking the only logical option within their locus of control, and you’re acting like somehow they should have done what exactly?

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 天前

      If you are in a nation that has only two choices and one is a FASCIST, you are in a fascist nation without real choice. You are once again embarrassing yourself to the rest of the world with this endless team based bullshit.

      IF THERE IS ONLY ONE “CORRECT” CHOICE THEN THERE IS NO CHOICE!

      This is what you all get when you turn your whole system into a fixed 2 headed hydra for years and years, but when you needed to stand up and change the system you all instead point fingers and blame instead of doing anything.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        You are acting as if it was not trump the nominee you wouldn’t have the same rhetoric. The lesser of the two state evil logic didn’t start during Trump first compaign in 2016

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 天前

          I did not have the same rhetoric when Biden was in office, come now this is next level putting words in my past hypothetical mouth.

          We agree that the two party system is and has been a total joke of a democratic system however.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 天前

          Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos.

          Your nation is a joke and the rest of the world is done with your shit.

          • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            The rest of the world does the exact same shit. I don’t know why you types outside the US think you’re somehow immune to facism, bigotry, and economic exploitation. And i say this living outside the US

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 天前

              When did I state otherwise? I know every nation is not immune, that is why american exceptionalism is frustrating.

          • ronl2k@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 天前

            Your nation is a joke and the rest of the world is done with your shit.

            And what esteemed nation are YOU from?

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 天前

              Canada, what is your point? We have our issues but last I checked we are not trying to take over Greenland.

              • ronl2k@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 天前

                Canada, what is your point?

                My point is that Canada isn’t good enough to look down upon the USA. And that’s putting it lightly.

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 天前

                  Oh that we disagree with, Canada is more then good enough for such a simple task.

          • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            6 天前

            K. Byeeee! Blocking you now as you have no dog in this race and just seem to want to bitch at someone.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 天前

              Perfect, just like your leaders, you would prefer living in a make believe world then live in reality.

              Clearly I have no “dog in this race” as if your shitstain of a nation is not in anyway involved with the world at all.

              Oh but wait you can’t see this and for some reason trying to make blocking someone some sort of slight.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 天前

      The fact of the matter is in an election where [ANYONE] vs FASCIST is the choices…

      Sorry Blue Maga, you will never win just because you are Hitler (D) vs Hitler.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 天前

      Truly, the amount of people on this website who will bend over backwards to push third party/protest votes despite all evidence that that is insanely naive and the equivalent to shooting their own legs off is insane.

      Somehow, these people, after decades of it not working, think that the democrats losing will magically bring in progressive Valhalla, because they literally refuse to acknowledge that the very obvious solution, that is equivalent to eating your veggies and doing exercise, is that the democrats have to keep winning, and they have to keep voting in progressives through primaries, state and local politics.

      Its extremely obvious to anyone who understand the 2 party supporting winner takes all/first past the post system they have.

      • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 天前

        Oh cool. Another Liberal completely blind to the internal workings of their chosen party. What pearls of wisdom do you have for us?

        I voted for Kamala. This was the first time in 20 years that I’ve cast my vote Alone.

        I rally everyone I can. And every time I had a rhetorical lever to remind my friends and family about the importance of this casual action, Kamala herself would rush to a camera to undermine everything I tried to say.

        “End the genocide!” Well shit, she came out as a full throated Zionist. Her and her party did anything and everything to alienate everyone who views Palestinians as human.

        “One genocide is better than two” well fuck, she promised to be harder on the border than a fucking Nazi.

        “Trans survival rests on this” aaaand I watched her stand agast at any suggestion that she assert the reality that Trans Women are Women.

        “We should codify Roe V Wade” and… Crickets from her.

        People were hurting and the economy was in the toilet? All she could do was talk up Biden’s effort, sans evidence.

        Her backers, her sponsors, her consultants, her party infrastructure all made sure she refused to stand for anything. Ever.

        And I blame you Lemmings for allowing this shit for actual decades. You haven’t had a real Primary since 2008, and you call this Democracy?

        Have the day you voted for - A half step up from the Maga reality of today, but with more concessions for Maga than even your own base or agenda.

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 天前

          The fact this is the type of shit that gets upvotes here is why you’re never pulling out.

          You rant about democrats as if you choosing to lop your own legs off will make them so angry they’re suddenly going to do what you want.

          You act like children, and ignore the obvious because it feels good to be angry at someone, and the democrats are the closest thing to being an org that will listen.

          Instead though, you, as you admitted, in the most important election in your life, choose to stop caring.

          Look at how childish all of your retorts are about all of the various things that she absolutely would not have specifically hurt if she had won.

          You think she would actively be encouraging israel to flaten palestine?

          You think she would be making ICE the actual gestapo?

          As for Roe v Wade, how exactly do you expect democrats to do such a thing without a senate super majority?

          You literally expect the impossible, and then give up and cry when you don’t get that.

          Her backers, her sponsors, her consultants, her party infrastructure all made sure she refused to stand for anything. Ever.

          Yet that was clearly the better option that shooting your own legs off.

          How do you not realize that the DNC literally is incentivised to offer less and less if the country keeps flipping back and forth? Then, all they have to do is correctly assert that they are the non insane option, and offer to undo some of the damage done.

          This is what they’ve done. This is what Biden has done, and somehow to you, you think that throwing a tantrum and literally getting marginalized people killed really got one over on the rich conservatives at the head of the DNC who will never see the inside of a grocery store.

          And I blame you Lemmings for allowing this shit for actual decades.

          What does this even mean exactly. You are clearly angry at some group you can’t actually specify.

          This comment really reinforces how much you misunderstand your own system. You’d rather hurt people because you can’t get your idealistic wishes.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            You think she would actively be encouraging israel to flaten palestine?

            Of course , you sound very ignorant or just use palestinians for political reasons. Gaza is flatened because of the billions of dollars you give to israel and all the weapons they get which every single goddamn US war criminal presidents did since the creation of the terrorist state of israel so how the hell do you think Harris would stop doing that?

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 天前

              Of course , you sound very ignorant or just use palestinians for political reasons.

              Its this type of insane take which makes it impossible to have useful discourse.

              There are literally 2 options, and you would rather choose the one with the worse outcome because they both suck. Thats simply immature and self harming in nature.

          • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 天前

            Instead though, you, as you admitted, in the most important election in your life, choose to stop caring.

            Again, I voted for her. I did everything I could to rally people to vote for her. And at every step of the way, she undermined my effort.

            Glad to see your reading comprehension is just as deep as that of a Maga voter.

            Do I expect her to accomplish anything? Nope, she’s a Democrat. Do I expect her to at least sell herself as a candidate? Yes, that’s the entire fucking point of an election.

            How do you not realize that the DNC literally is incentivised to offer less and less if the country keeps flipping back and forth? Then, all they have to do is correctly assert that they are the non insane option, and offer to undo some of the damage done.

            So… Concede to Fascists, and pretend that’s a winning strategy. Gotcha.

            Given the choice between diet Hitler, and full flavored commitment? The country will choose the Marlboro Reds of Fascism for at least being consistent. This is not up to me.

            You will accept whatever Slop the unDemocratic party gives you, and be okay because “at least its not 100% Hitler, we’re doing better!” As the country slides into Hell. This is your fault for pretending Reaganite madness is the Center, and everyone else is “insane Leftists”.

            Meanwhile, Mamdani had a vision, and people mobilized behind it. Won his election by the largest margin in a NYC Mayoral race since 1968. Democrats win when turnout is High, and actually HAVING A PLATFORM drives turnout.

            Where was your “blue no matter who” for Zohran? Oh wait, it doesn’t matter because the Party backed another friend of Epstein.

            You people make me sick. I am actually having an easier time rehabbing Maga voters than talking to the people vote with at gunpoint.

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 天前

              I did everything I could to rally people to vote for her.

              You mentioned that you did not “This was the first time in 20 years that I’ve cast my vote Alone.” Unless I misunderstood that to mean you expect me to believe that despite them losing less than 10% of their voter base, 100% of people you knew didn’t show up.

              So… Concede to Fascists, and pretend that’s a winning strategy. Gotcha.

              This is literally what you appear to be advocating for. Im utterly confused by this attempt to reframe things.

              Given the choice between diet Hitler, and full flavored commitment?

              Calling Kamala Harris diet hitler is lunacy.

              You will accept whatever Slop the unDemocratic party gives you, and be okay because “at least its not 100% Hitler, we’re doing better!” As the country slides into Hell. This is your fault for pretending Reaganite madness is the Center, and everyone else is “insane Leftists”.

              It seems you are clearly arguing in bad faith when you on one hand pretend that you voted for and supported Harris, yet on the other hand, say this.

              These are not congruent thoughts.

              One of these things must be a lie.

              I mean look at this intensly obvious bad faith strawman argument: "and everyone else is “insane Leftists”.

              Meanwhile, Mamdani had a vision, and people mobilized behind it. Won his election by the largest margin in a NYC Mayoral race since 1968. Democrats win when turnout is High, and actually HAVING A PLATFORM drives turnout.

              What are you arguing against out of anything I’ve mentioned here.

              Everything you say seems to be in bad faith.

              You are arguing against a person who is not a part of the DNC, because you do not like the strategy of the DNC, as if its that persons fault. This is not a sane position to hold.

              You people make me sick. I am actually having an easier time rehabbing Maga voters than talking to the people vote with at gunpoint.

              You once again, describe yourself in the same group that you say makes you sick.

              It once again seems like you must be lying.

              • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 天前

                You mentioned that you did not “This was the first time in 20 years that I’ve cast my vote Alone.” Unless I misunderstood that to mean you expect me to believe that despite them losing less than 10% of their voter base, 100% of people you knew didn’t show up.

                Fascinating. So any disagreement must be “in bad faith” to you?

                So… Concede to Fascists, and pretend that’s a winning strategy. Gotcha.

                This is literally what you appear to be advocating for. Im utterly confused by this attempt to reframe things.

                The very platform your politicians advocate for is concessionary, and I’m tired of pretending otherwise. All of them. From Chuck Schumer conceding on the Shutdown, to Obama just adopting Romneycare as his own? The party exists to fold to Republicans.

                It seems you are clearly arguing in bad faith when you on one hand pretend that you voted for and supported Harris, yet on the other hand, say this.

                Support? Now that’s a strong word. Voted for, advocated for in conversation? Your black and white thinking is showing.

                You are arguing against a person who is not a part of the DNC, because you do not like the strategy of the DNC, as if its that persons fault. This is not a sane position to hold

                You support the platform of the DNC, the party insiders by proxy when you continue to support their bullshit even a year after the election. I do not care that you are just as powerless over their internal processes as I am. You continue to express your Stockholm Syndrome for their failing agenda, even as an actually viable alternative presents itself.

                Break out. Turn off the MSNBC, leave the KHive, go try on Hasan Piker as an entry point for your therapy.

                • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 天前

                  Fascinating. So any disagreement must be “in bad faith” to you?

                  At this point there is clearly no good discussing anything with you when the very specific bad faith arguments you made have been pointed out precisely, but you choose to instead, again in bad faith, claim that its a meritless dismissal.

                  The very platform your politicians advocate for is concessionary, and I’m tired of pretending otherwise.

                  You also state you advocate for them though… where is your high horse unless you are lying.

                  All of them. From Chuck Schumer conceding on the Shutdown, to Obama just adopting Romneycare as his own? The party exists to fold to Republicans.

                  Partially because you keep letting them do so with your rhetoric that utterly fails to understand how this works. They love switching back and forth for this reason. Without the flip flopping, they could be arm twisted into being more progressive, but you somehow wish so badly you could punish them for not doing as you please that youd rather see exactly what you claim to hate.

                  Support? Now that’s a strong word. Voted for, advocated for in conversation? Your black and white thinking is showing.

                  This is you being completely unable to see nuance.

                  You are, at this point, saying that you pretty much agree with what I am saying, but want to bash me for some made up beliefs you have where every person who believes the clear fact that of the 2 options democrats are the correct ones also completely supports how the DNC operates, which obviously is false.

                  You support the platform of the DNC, the party insiders by proxy when you continue to support their bullshit even a year after the election.

                  What in the universe could this possibly mean. Are you suggesting that you will be supporting the republicans instead? Because it is one or the other, so this just goes back to your ridiculous assumption from above.

                  I do not care that you are just as powerless over their internal processes as I am. You continue to express your Stockholm Syndrome for their failing agenda, even as an actually viable alternative presents itself.

                  What viable alternative?

                  You speak in meandering riddles because ultimately your positions hold no merit. This is why all you can do is spout irrelevant rhetoric and specific criticisms against your views.

                  go try on Hasan Piker as an entry point for your therapy.

                  This says it all then doesn’t it. You follow a pretend socialist influencer and think that means that you are are supirior to everyone else despite being unable to grasp the viewpoints of others nor state your own clearly.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        Its extremely obvious to anyone who understand the 2 party supporting winner takes all/first past the post system they have

        Keep voting for the lesser of the two evils till there is nothing left to be saved. Trump won to begin with because the majority of americans though he was the lesser of the two evil

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 天前

          Keep voting for the lesser of the two evils till there is nothing left to be saved.

          If you actually kept doing that you’d have not only much to be saved, but you’d eventually have a good option if following the rest of what I advise.

          You types literally never have workable solutions. Your suggestions are all impractical hail marys because you refuse to acknoledge the actual solution is slow, and uncomfortable.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 天前

            If you actually kept doing that you’d have not only much to be saved, but you’d eventually have a good option if following the rest of what I advise

            The two-party system is like two competing loggers who keep abusing tree chopping. One may be slower than the other but at the end the day the forest will disappear . The damage of a bad administration may need multiple good administrations to repair all the damage.

            Please tell me why would any of the two parties listen to any single issue you have if you will going to vote for them again and again anyway

            the actual solution is slow, and uncomfortable.

            Yes , making a viable 3rd party solution is very slow and unconfortable

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 天前

              Please tell me why would any of the two parties listen to any single issue you have if you will going to vote for them again and again anyway

              I literally explained at the very start of this exactly how it works. You vote in more progressives into the party to change its goals. The goals of the DNC are what you hate.

              The 2 party system, you hate too, and thats reasonable, but its the system you have, and you’re not getting away from it within a lifetime.

              Yes , making a viable 3rd party solution is very slow and unconfortable

              No. Its nonsensical, childish, and utterly dangerous for all the people you will be sacrificing just to fail to accomplish your goal.

              Its an inherent flaw of 2 party systems. They do not support true 3rd parties because they do not have proportional representation. The end result of winner takes all/first past the post systems is such that you cannot simply make a third party, especially where the established party against the side you’ll be weakening explicitly plans to completely remove your ability to vote.

              This is obvious. You keep wanting to scream and be angry at people for acknowledging the system as it is and not simply throwing tantrums because it isnt how they wish it to be.

              You will die too, not just the marginalized people you are so willing to throw away if you allow for republicans to gain a almost certain permanent rein, which is what supporting a third party would do.

              The best thing you could do is actually to prop up third parties splitting off of republicans if you actually wanted to see a change.

    • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 天前

      It’s so frustrating that conservatives get to vote for a candidate who shares their morals.

      I am so sick of being told the problem is me not holding my nose hard enough.

      I have high hopes but exceedingly low expectations that the new chair of the DNC will support democratic socialist candidates.

  • Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 天前

    Flopped? It was incredibly close and if Elon did what he claimed she probably won overall. It’s only MAGAts that think it was a landslide.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 天前

      When a team loses a basketball game by 1 point, literally every missed shot or turnover (or blown defensive coverage leading to an easy basket for the other side or foul leading to made free throws) could be pointed to as the “cause” of that loss.

      So yeah, if she were an actual better politician she probably would’ve won with the cards she was dealt. But there were also dozens of other causes that would’ve made her (or an alternative candidate) win, all else being equal.

      And it’s hard to see how a better politician would’ve ended up in that position to begin with. The circumstances of how Harris ended up as VP probably wouldn’t have happened if not for the specific way that her 2020 campaign flamed out.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 天前

    Kamala is so out of touch it’s outrageous. If you take things at face value and Kamala says “I wouldn’t do anything different from Biden” and you have Trump saying “Biden destroyed the USA” it seems to reason that voting for Kamala means you want more fails.

    Of course, things are usually more nuanced than this, but do you think the average American voter is extremely savvy? If anything, the future of the country is determined by quips and sound bites.

    Here’s a clue: if you need to hire “influence experts” to figure out how to “outreach” to younger voters, you’re out of touch. For several categories of voter, it seems that they are valued for what they pick in the voting booth instead of any kind of actual consideration.

    Trump’s rhetoric and puffery makes some people believe he has their back. Kamala’s pitch seems to boil down to “I’m not that other guy”, which historically doesn’t get you very far.

    It was frustrating to watch the election more or less be handed to Donald Trump, because the only segment of society the Democrats seemed to appeal to was the large corporations that hand over large amounts of donation money. The plight of the average citizen was nowhere near the top list of concerns.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 天前

      you have Trump saying “Biden destroyed the USA” it seems to reason that voting for Kamala means you want more fails.

      Of course, things are usually more nuanced than this, but do you think the average American voter is extremely savvy?

      Sorry, but your opinion is foolish. If your “average unsavvy American voter” was going to vote against Biden just because Trump said he destroyed America, they weren’t going to vote for Kamala no matter what she said.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 天前

        What’s your point? People that don’t like Biden don’t like Kamala either? I agree.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 天前

    Whats the word for when you don’t really fully like someone, so you don’t vote for them, thereby giving the edge to the other guy, who you don’t like even more?

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 天前

      It’s called “right wing stupidity” and we should be calling out these worthless dumbfucks wherever we can. Although we should be clear that it does not seem like those particular brainless fools made enough of a difference.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      Spine? Conviction?

      Whatever it is, the important takeaway is if future campaigns take the same approach, they’re liable to get the same results.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    6 天前

    IMO she lost because her entire platform was:

    • i’m a woman
    • i’m non-white
    • support trans rights

    none of that tackles the cost-of-living crisis, none of that gives people an economic future.

    • toddestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 天前

      To me her platform was:

      • I’m not Trump
      • I’m going to keep on doing what Biden was doing
      • Republicans you should vote for me because I’m not that different than you

      The bottom two is what really did her in. Being the status quo candidate when people aren’t happy with the status quo isn’t a winning strategy. Neither is ignoring your base to pander to a group of people who will never for vote for you.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 天前

      support trans rights

      Why do you surrender so easily to right-wing framing? What ads did she run supporting trans rights? What did she possibly do to make it an issue of her campaign?

      There were two sides on trans rights. On one side, we had literal Nazis. On the other, silence. You conclude that the side that stayed silent made their whole campaign about trans rights, which is completely delusional.

      Read the article. Kamala made her opinion of LGBT rights abundantly clear. She explicitly rejected Pete Buttigieg using the same logic a thousand other passive bigots I’ve met use. “I have no problem with queer people, but I can’t be near queer people because of what people might think of me.”

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 天前

      Not sure why you’re downvoted when you’re absolutely right and Mamdani proved it too. People are suffocating under the economic pressure, they consider other issues less important until that one is resolved.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 天前

      The right was the side that wouldn’t stop talking about trans issues as if they were a pressing matter. More manufactured outrage from the side that has been manufacturing outrage from every non-issue for decades.

    • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 天前

      Vs. a fascist dictator? It should have been a no-brainer, but instead it proved that a lack of brains is exactly what causes someone to choose not to vote or to protest via 3rd party nobodies.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        Trump is power because of the dumb lesser of two evil rhetoric that been used for over 100 years and the two party system. Most americans was dumb enough to think Trump was the less evil. 3rd party voters has zero effect on Trump winning so stop blaming them

        • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 天前

          So, what you’re saying is that the third party vote sent no message or made no point?? Because I remember tons of people here crying about how their vote for a third party candidate was a clear message to establishment dems that didn’t do what was demanded of them.

          That if they weren’t perfect in every way- third party candidates would get their vote.

          Seems it was as ineffective and wasteful as we all said it would be.

          I appreciate that you’re at least being honest about it and that we can both agree that third party votes are pointless.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 天前

            ​> So, what you’re saying is that the third party vote sent no message or made no point?? Because I remember tons of people here crying about how their vote for a third party candidate was a clear message to establishment dems that didn’t do what was demanded of them

            I don’t care about what the other people and I don’t care if it prove a point or not. You do what you think is the best that’s all.

            ​I hope you are not a defeatist in your own life and abandon any of your life goals because they are hard or may be impossible to do.

            ​What I see is people like you crying about third-party voters and blame them for losing to Genocide Trump, although results show that they wouldn’t make Harris win if they all voted for her. ​

            Seems it was as ineffective and wasteful as we all said it would be

            ​What is wasteful is all the money the two parties spend in campaigns then keep failing Americans. What is ineffective is having one of the dumbest politician Kamala Harris that has a terrible compaign on every single goddamn issue

            • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 天前

              And…… where are those 3rd party candidates now? Mind tell me what they’ve been doing to stand in the way of fascism lately??

              Stein? West? Not a fucking peep that I’ve heard.

              Actually, I’ve not heard a fucking word from ANY of them since they all turned to vapor back in November.

              So let’s not wax poetic about the bullshit promise of what a 3rd party candidate could do when they prove every fucking election to promise a lot of nonsense they have no place to promise, and then vanish when they are found wanting.

  • Hannibal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 天前

    I am not trying to be political or upset anybody of either side. I blame Joe Biden for this, before you judge or get upset or disagree with me–just wait. I believe this is particularly the reason she lost. She was left only from July to November to figure out her platform, determine a potential running mate, and come up with ideas.

    Usually they start campaigning around the midterms leaving nearly 2 years. She only had 4-5 months to prepare. She had limited amount of time to prepare her political campaign, to figure out her agenda how to get her message out there to everybody. Wait for time for people to hear it. They were not sure of her policies, they thought she was just an extension of Joe Biden because she didn’t have time.

    This is just one factor. She did a very excellent job for the few months she had left. She could have done a better job if Joe Biden had not ran a second term.

    Then it upset people that Democrats didn’t hold an open primary. She would have still won most likely, but for the younger generation and others. It was a turn off, they said it was a form of tyranny. (Of course it wasn’t. Even Republican party in 2020 cancelled primaries in some states)

    Then you had states cleaning up the ‘voting rolls’ people didn’t realize they were unregistered, and ran out of time to register again. In a lot of states, I don’t believe you can register on the day you vote. I might be wrong though.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 天前

      No she is rightfully to blame. Her platform was “Nothing will change” and “Israel has a right to defend itself”. If she would have not said those 2 things she would have won.

      • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 天前

        Well I’m pretty sure with a longer campaign he team would’ve figured out “I’ll keep doing what Biden is doing” was a losing message and dropped it. I don’t think there was any chance of them acknowledging the genocide in Gaza by Nov '24, because the general public hadn’t come around on it by then.

        I don’t know if that would’ve changed the outcome.

        Biden should’ve kept his promise to be transitional and let there be an honest to god Democratic primary.

        • rafoix@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 天前

          She pushed a very popular and likable Tim Walz out of the way to put a fucking Cheney front and center. Cheney are historically evil people.

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      It is Joe Biden’s fault for not allowing a real dem primary. Kamala did terrible in the 2020 primary though, so she likely would have not gotten to the general election in 2024 without Biden’s meddling.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        agreed. But I think it goes back much farther. Biden was never a good senator, always was soft on constitutional rights and civil liberties, and has always been a racist and a demagogue. He never should have been president in the first place. The fact that he was shows how far back the rot thats killing the dem party sprang from.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 天前

      She refused to appear in unscripted events. People point to Trump’s podcast appearances as the reason he won, but in my opinion it’s closer to the truth to say that Kamala refusing to appear unless everything was closely controlled is what really cost her.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 天前

        Some of that may also be that the secret service doesn’t allow for to much non “closely controlled” environments. Not sure exactly how that works, but I assume you have to let them know where you are going to be in advance and they figure out who is going to be there and set perimeter and everything else, which if you are nervous I imagine you fall into a “I should prepare for this interview” having hours/possibly days to do so.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 天前

      She was left only from July to November to figure out her platform, determine a potential running mate, and come up with ideas.

      She didn’t have too little time. She had too much time. She could have won if Biden had died a week before the election, and she had to take over last minute. The peak of her popularity was right when she got the candidacy. And it was all downhill from there. The more voters got to know her, the less they liked her. If she had had more time, it would have been much worse.

      She was a deeply unlikable candidate that ran dead last in the primary she ran in. She was chosen by Biden as VP precisely because she was seen as unelectable and thus not a serious rival for Biden’s position.

    • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 天前

      Yea! See how much better things are! My god! Imagine the absolute HELL we would be in had she had won!

      • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        It would be more of exactly the same except liberals would be at brunch, not noticing that it’s their party that is chasing down Haitian immigrants on a horseback or deporting immigrants in record numbers or having two back-to-back years of the largest increase of the unhoused. Every time Republicans shift further to the right Democrats are in lockstep right behind them to fill the void just left by Republicans. Did you think that Biden giving ice one of the largest federal increases of funding they have ever seen with the largest expansion of detention centers was going to go unused?

          • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            Hallucinations would be the people doing the same thing over and over and over again and failing every time and always blame other people for their failures

              • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 天前

                We all know you are more upset about not being able to go back to brunch so you don’t have to think about politics than you are about our current conditions

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      8 天前

      Harris adviser says VP ran ‘flawless’ campaign

      “I would posit she ran a pretty flawless campaign, and she did all the steps that [were] required to be successful,” she added. “And I think – obviously, we did not win, but I do think we hit all the marks.”

      Nix, Harris’ campaign manager, also attributed Trump’s decision not to participate in any debate following the ABC News presidential debate on Sept. 10 as detrimental to the Harris campaign’s strategy of presenting the choice between Trump and Harris clearly to voters several times.

      “I think that was hard for us to then get the attention that we would have liked to,” Nix said.

      Well, there you have it. Perfect campaign. No notes. Just wish Trump had been willing to debate, because we all know the problem Harris had was getting her face out there.

          • saimen@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            7 天前

            So this is why you supported Trump (by not voting against him)? Wouldn’t it still be so much better than what you have now?

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 天前

              Votes aren’t wishes. The electoral college is a thing. Many states are locked down for one side or the other and it really doesn’t matter who any individual votes for. In fact, being from Connecticut, I’ve voted for a third party for decades because I feel like it’s the only way for my vote for president to potentially have an impact. Unless you know this person lives in a swing state you’re being really ignorant by throwing out those kinds of accusations.

              • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                6 天前

                Because that’s the sane thing to do.

                If you think Trump is worse than Harris but didn’t vote for Harris then you deserve the stupid bed you helped make us all sleep in. 🤷

                Edit:

                Always happy to get the overnight downvotes from the euro brigade. The true experts of US electoral politics. Thanks guys!

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 天前

                  I’ve only seen this phenomenon on Lemmy where it’s a hard stance all or nothing about every hot topic. Also, I think many here are privileged people. After all, it’s not the Lemmy user’s families being abducted at immigration hearings or whose kids are losing their only meal option because Republicans ended school lunches. So they yap all day about the genocide in Gaza, don’t bother to vote and the cycle repeats. Because in the end, they personally are not affected

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 天前

              Why did you vote for someone even worse than Trump? If Kamala had won, someone even worse than Trump would have got the Republican nomination in 2028. And they would have easily beat Kamala then. She wouldn’t have done anything to alter the conditions that lead to Trump. And now at least Republicans are likely to lose in 2028 (dooming about the end to elections aside.) And more critically, we actually have a shot at getting in Democrats that might actually be able to do something about fighting fascism.

              You didn’t vote to fight fascism. You just voted for even worse fascism four years down the line.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    8 天前

    I was never a big fan, but I was passionate about supporting her from the moment Biden stammered through that debate until this moment in her DNC speech: https://youtube.com/shorts/-UQliWnKnqY

    This was the moment when she did the heel turn away from all the clever, momentum building moves that assembled a surprisingly left-friendly coalition. Everything after this was punching left and she lost as a result.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 天前

      I still think Biden’s refusal to let go of the reins until way way too late is what doomed her primarily. As VP, she had to hold and defend Biden’s exact policies and positions, even the unpopular ones, while he was running. By the time he finally quit, she was basically stuck inside the rotting corpse of his campaign, having painted herself into a corner on every issue.

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 天前

    Article was a great read. This part really resonated with me.

    It may seem petty to use this incident, but it does illustrate Harris’s expectation that the world should conform to her needs. Towels on the far side of the room? Someone else must fetch them. A slot as the Democrat presidential candidate that party leaders conveniently made sure would be uncontested by anyone else, a massively well-funded campaign that raked in over a billion dollars and the support of celebrities like Oprah and Beyoncé, a popular vice presidential candidate, a huge boost in the polls as soon as she stepped into the campaign… and, yet, somehow, her loss is still anyone’s fault but her own. Why are my towels on the other side of the room? Who will fetch them for me?

    It really did feel that way in hindsight. That we all were just supposed to conform to her and not the other way around.

    I remember Hacks on Tap talking about how their contacts were frustrated that Harris wasn’t out doing more national television interviews and that she wasn’t really putting herself out there. This feels like another example of the towel in the bathroom.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 天前

      So… the Dem strategy was… run an insufferable, stuffy, haughty narcissist to counter a more bombastic, less classy, insufferable narcissist…???

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      5 天前

      Not for nothing, but trump wasn’t exactly out there either outside of the incel podcasts. She was a poor candidate and the funding bullshit meant she had to be the candidate. Fuck her, but fuck every protest non voter way more.

      Edit: knowing I pissed off at least three of you you lazy fuckers makes me smile.

      Edit 2: 8!

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 天前

        No FUCK Biden for continuing to run even though he was too damn old to. He should have passed the torch properly and allowed for primaries to happen.

        • tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 天前

          He not only robbed us of a primary, he broke his one term promise.

          And in doing so, shoved an uncharismatic center right candidate down our throats, whose only redeeming quality was not Trump.

          Is that what democracy looks like?

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 天前

              So even worse, he manipulated and deceived the entire electorate from the get-go.

              Did Biden explicitly promise to be a one term candidate? No. But he personally implied it on many occasions, and he had his underlings spread the messaging of him as a one-term president in the press. His minions were out there in the media basing their entire pitch for his candidacy on the idea of him as a one-term caretaker president, running to restore normalcy.

              He deliberately put the idea in the public consciousness that he would only run for a single term but without ever explicitly promising to do so. This way the bastard could get woo voters on the prospect of him making a graceful exit, but while still leaving his future options open. It was a Machiavellian move, and it ultimately blew up in his face and gave Trump a second term.

            • tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 天前

              Okay so it wasn’t a promise, it was a leak from several of his aides that was probably calculated in order to help folks feel more comfortable electing somebody that’s 77.

              The fact that he spoke out of both sides of his mouth, one being the mouth of several of his aides, doesn’t change my feelings about the man.

        • khepri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 天前

          I think people forget that Harris only had a mere 15 weeks between Biden dropping out and election day to establish herself and try to bootstrap and run some kind of campaign that wasn’t just her wearing Joe’s skin. It’s insane that anyone expected her to win under those conditions and Biden could not have fucked us harder with his arrogance. Add to that the headwinds of her being a woman of color, not especially charismatic, and to the right of her base on many issues, and the outcome was written in stone from the start.

          • bufalo1973@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            I always find it funny that the US sees 15 weeks as too short for making a campaign when in Europe we have 2 weeks for the European elections campaign.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            If she had had more time, she would have lost even worse. The peak of her popularity was when people knew nothing about her. She just kept getting more unpopular as the election wore on.

            The only scenario that Kamala could have won is if Biden had somehow dropped out just weeks before the election. Her only shot was to get elected before people really got to know her. She’s a deeply unlikable candidate.

          • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            The only reason Biden picked her for vice president was that she was a woman and black because she honestly ain’t a good politician in general. Her performance in 2020 is telling. I remember the CumTown podcast was constantly making jokes about her back then and they were still relevant in 2024.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 天前

              I never understand comments like these. She was elected senator of California. She was an AG. Her list of accomplishments is available on Wikipedia for free. What does a black woman have to do to prove herself in this day?

              • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 天前

                Why else would he pick the least popular person who ran for the Democrat primary for vice president??? He straight up said that is why he picked the Supreme Court justice he picked and you can assume the same for Vice President. If you are going to pick someone for that position, then pick someone people actually like.

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 天前

                  This comment just reeks of vibes. She’s extremely accomplished and intelligent. She wasn’t the most hilarious or charming person, but again, that’s not what I look for in a leader.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            In 2020, she had all the time in the world, and she mismanaged things badly enough that she ended up dropping out before a single vote was cast. What happened in 2024 was purely advantageous to her, she got to skip the primary altogether and only had to keep it together for 15 weeks. Few people in history have ever received such a privileged ramp towards the presidency.

            The primary process is an additional hoop that a candidate has to jump through, they have to appeal to a different segment of the people than in the general, which may leave them having to pivot or backtrack on their positions. They may have to endure bad blood, or harsher criticism from people who had been invested in another candidate. You could say that the lack of the primary cost the Democrats the election but only in the sense that Kamala probably wouldn’t have won a primary and we’d have gotten someone better.

            15 weeks is also plenty of time to get a message out. Other countries do much shorter campaign lengths. And in the current situation where most people are driven by “negative partisanship,” voting against the people they hate more, being relatively unknown (not that a VP is that unknown) can be advantageous.

            The main thing was policy but she was also just an unpopular politician with bad political instincts (campaigning with the Cheney 's lol), and she basically got to fail upwards and bypass any of the checks that would’ve recognized that unpopularity before it was too late.

          • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            6 天前

            Don’t care how much we get down voted! Fuck yeah this sentiment! Fuck all your protest non voters! I hope you read this and it makes you upset!

            Edit: why am I twice as high as homie saying the same thing‽

            Edit 2: that’s better, bring on the hate you lazy fuckers!