You claimed to care about the LGBTQ community but you are here dismissing people from that community as intellectually deficient.

do the one thing being asked of you to stop fascism

Entitled much? Like I already voted but that isn’t enough for you. You want me to be silent as you inflict your anger on others instead of the system thst enabled fascism.

If they were honest with themselves they would admit they don’t even believe in democracy. It’s impossible to hold such cynicism towards your neighbors whilst also thinking their opinions matter.

And I’ll be there to call out how you are attacking the people you claim to care about, not to change their mind, but because you are scared. The latter is valid, but the former is counterproductive.

At least now it’s more clear what motivated this shit post.

What entitles you to not care? I already voted but I am not under the illusion that the leadership that sleeped walked us into this mess will do anything but buy us more time to organize.

You have prominent democratic consultants like James Carville saying he would rather we loose the house to fascists than negotiate with the DSA. When voters hear that they stop believing it is a dire situation. If the candidates themselves believed the election was existential they would stop doing unpopular things. The call is coming from inside. Framing popularity as a purity test is simply wishing elections behaved differently.

Isn’t that this meme though? Being the lesser of evils doesn’t entitle your candidate to win a popularity contest. I voted for Harris BTW.

The purpose of a system is what it does. We are all trying to make someone else personally responsible for this mess instead of critiquing the systems that got us here. Meanwhile the leadership of the democratic party openly states they would rather loose to Republicans than have to negotiate with the DSA.

Only if you live in a swing state bus.

It will never reach the scale of use they claim unless it becomes a commodity.

Unfortunately he is representative of the DNC consultants. The guy interviewing him treated his opinion as a given.

The guy has been awfully silent about the GOP trying to deport Ilhan Omar.

Do something better than the ACA or label AIPAC as a foreign entity.

You have agents classify what each portion of the network responds to and how. One compares it to filling out a very large crossword puzzle: https://already-clean.goodfire.com/

That’s the theory anways, not sure if it will stand the test of time…

And what happens if you try doing a 3 some by pair programming with AI? I can only assume it is somehow even less satisfying seeing how it is not a common practice.

200k is like being paid for 4 speeches for some of those folk.

Or maybe fixating on one literal aspect instead of the context is missing the forrest for the trees.

Isn’t that the idea behind the GPL? To make it so even if a community behind a codebase regressed into that dynamic a different community can decide to fork it.

And how is the programming language you choose to use a political statement?

Consider the following as one example:

Most programming languages are english-centric and even the ones that support unicode for defining variables and method statements might not support right to left languages. Then there are different numeric systems that are culturally based. These technical decisions have a social impact that makes it more difficult for other cultures to interact with the codebase by increasing the barrier of entry. Does this mean i stop writing code in python or Javascript for work? No, because that would be too difficult and high of a cost. But i don’t deny the social and political impact of these decisions.

There are key distinctions between the movement of the earth and a train, one of which is that humans are in control of the speed, timing, and direction of trains. All those aspects are influenced by politics, unlike the rotation of the earth. But you get the jist, it is impossible for a human to stand still in a political sense.