Or actively ridiculed

There’s no reason to compare to child abuse. You absolutely seemed to be saying “eh, corruption is potentially fine”, which stands on its own.

Whatever, you seem like a real tool (“learn to read”) so I’ll be blocking you.

Oh OK we’ll just do that then

No, you worded it in a way that was easy to interpret that you thought OP had issues that required therapy instead of being upset at the husband. Not because it was implied that it was an insult that someone might require therapy.

Did you just “etc etc” corruption…?

Lemmy nerds, man

price firm

I will give you $2, cash

Content?

Can we not restart the argument please.

To me, it’s a lot more important in this post to look at the response from mods and admins to a disagreement (and infighting, and mistakes made).

Personally it seems like it was handled well, at least eventually (here). Do you feel one way or the other?