The argument the mod writes is 👌

Update : there’s a new one that appears but, I’ve checked, that’s the same mod as the others

Update 2 : got contacted by the mod, overall sweet guy/gal we agree to disagree and keep the ban up, who said that Lemmy cannot be civil

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    LCARS was a data access and retrieval system capable of doing calculations and simulations. It was not, I REPEAT, was not “artificial intelligence”. It did not try to act or sound sentient, it simply responded to commands and ran programs.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      TOS had the m5, which went rogue and started attacking and blowing up other starships, and lower decks had the Texas class, which went rogue and started attacking other starships

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Though it could create intelligence. “Computer, make an opponent that can be better than data”. Ok, guess it’s time to make a sentient hologram then.

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        But that could only be done if the method do so had been stored as a program in the databanks. In Voyager, when they try to replicate The Doctor; Harry writes a program and then tells the computer to run that program. When the hologram fails, he has to reprogram it and run again.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          It’s not like Star Trek is the most consistent over time.

          In Voyager, they did tend to treat the Doctor with more care and show that it was a lot of hard work. By extension the other sentient holograms.

          In TNG, they absolutely just casually upgraded a run of the mill holodeck NPC to a sentient being with a single supremely vague directive.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There is at least one instance where it was written as sapient in TNG. That was mostly for a joke, though. Specifically, there was a running gag in early TNG with Data getting a bit too into defining things and someone (usually Picard) would interrupt him with something along the lines of, “Thank you, Data, we get it.” In one scene, Data is alone and only talking to the computer, which gives the line there.