You know I thought I was dealing with adults who were aware that the entire world knew this(minus the Elon-stans who refuse to acknowledge it), but apparently I was wrong and that every post here has to include that in it otherwise all the little feelings get hurt.
Purity test subs are just fucking weird.
Yes Elon is one of the pervs and he’s the perv who makes it possible for other pervs to do heinous shit, but you know who else makes it possible for pervs to do heinous shit? The entire fucking internet because it, historically, runs on porn. Oh, and Photoshop.
So lesson learned for me, I guess, because I have a habit of just posting willy-nilly on places like Lemmy. Note to self: check that the place isn’t weird as fuck first.
Go to my original post and point to where I said anything about letting anyone off. Actually said it. Not didn’t respond the way that you apparently need people to respond to make you comfortable.
You didn’t recently come here via Reddit by chance, did you? Because this is absolutely the most Reddit coded response I’ve seen lately.
When a simple statement gets attacked for not including EVERY possibility for an “um akshually” guy. ::orbital eye roll::
Were you truly not able to deduce that if I made the statement about PREDATORY MEN who used Grok that this included the PREDATORY MEN who enabled that use by Grok as well?
Because “yes that’s bad too” is only the opposite of that in YOUR head, buddy.
I’m not dumbing down how I write and I expect a modicum of intelligence and discernment to elicit anything more than derision on my part. Especially accusations like yours so massage your holier-than-thou attitude.
So just let me know how much help you need understanding simple statements of fact next time before you get yourself all hot and bothered.
That goes for the morons who apparently agreed with this guy.
Right, because they pull their own triggers, etc., etc…
Edit: To clarify to make absolutely certain you can’t possibly think I’m agreeing with you, I’m not complaining about Grok, although chatbot “AI” are stupid fucking tools for tools, I’m comlaining about the PREDATORS who use chatbots to do sexual deviancy shit.
Not unlike the ammosexuals/ICE agents who fantasize about using their ARs to kill women.
I guess I misinterpreted your comment. I thought you were trying to imply that all of the responsibility rested on the badly-behaving users and that the makers of Grok had no responsibility to prevent sexual harassment and CSAM on their platform.
Another weirdo who thinks “and that’s bad too” is a statement of absolution for predators and those who abet them.
Is that because of No Child Left Behind?
Has Lemmy adopted the “um aksuually” guy Reddit standard for writing analysis and media literacy?
No, person of dubious ability to comprehend what you read, this is NOT what I am saying, this is what you want to believe that I am saying. For some bizarre ass reason.
White knighting? Red-pill accusations misdirect?
Please, feel free to explain your logic and thoughts on this.
And what makes you think “and that’s bad too” doesn’t? Seriously. Explain your work.
Was there not enough histrionics or wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth for you?
So explain your logic and thoughts about why you think EVERY FUCKING RESPONSE needs to cater to your whims?
The entire fucking planet knows that Nazi trillionaires selling a service that can be used for child porn, at least be accurate, is BAD. Are you serious right now?
DO you hang around so many Nazi pedos that this needs to be constantly reiterated lest you forget?
Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.
The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.
That the combination of words that I used to describe shouldn’t even be allowed to exist and will likely be a liner notes in any surviving history.
If we are outraged enough to admonish anyone involved it should be the child porn profiteer, not relegating his moral failings under the broad category of “oh, yea, that’s bad, too.”
I don’t disagree. But my point is that, if creepy, predatory men are so ubiquitous, so shameless, and such a known factor (which anyone with half a brain should agree they are) then isn’t the fastest and most efficient way to minimize harm removing the tools of abuse from the hands of the abusers?
So this is because I didn’t paint with a broad brush and create a plan of action or are we tarring and feathering ANYONE associated with AI now (which I’m totally on board with, btw, just not something I bother writing in every statement I made)?
The most efficient and effective way to minimize hard, in this case, would be chemical castration of all such abusers everywhere. Anything less is just cosplaying justice.
Should I castigate you for NOT making that statement?
Does that make you a horrible person who supports sex offenders? Don’t you feel guilty for NOT including that in EVERY reply or post you make?
See how weird that is?
I find it so odd that because I made a statement about the predatory men who fucking use AI to do this you weirdos think this means that doesn’t include Musk and his team who aid and abet them.
Like it’s WEIRD that some of you jumped to that conclusion. It’s not just you. I’ve been posting on the internet since the mid 90s and late stage Reddit was the first time I encountered that kind of thing and I’m not sure where it came from. Maybe it was always there and I just never encountered it until then.
But DAMN it is WEIRD.
I mena, there’s writing analysis and media literacy, and then there’s whatever this wild speculation shit is.
The most efficient and effective way to minimize hard, in this case, would be chemical castration of all such abusers everywhere. Anything less is just cosplaying justice.
Those drugs are actually of dubious utility unless you are just seeking to cause medical harm to people.
And it has absolutely no bearing on AI. No amount of chemicals will stop grok, and from what I hear Elon’s genitals may already be mangled and useless.
PREDATORS used Grok to deepfake…
A predator put out grok.
Sure, and that’s bad too.
But Elon isn’t making those pervs do pervy things. He’s just making it easier.
Elon is one of the pervs.
You know I thought I was dealing with adults who were aware that the entire world knew this(minus the Elon-stans who refuse to acknowledge it), but apparently I was wrong and that every post here has to include that in it otherwise all the little feelings get hurt.
Purity test subs are just fucking weird.
Yes Elon is one of the pervs and he’s the perv who makes it possible for other pervs to do heinous shit, but you know who else makes it possible for pervs to do heinous shit? The entire fucking internet because it, historically, runs on porn. Oh, and Photoshop.
So lesson learned for me, I guess, because I have a habit of just posting willy-nilly on places like Lemmy. Note to self: check that the place isn’t weird as fuck first.
If being a producer of child pornography earns a “sure, that’s bad too” I’m going to just assume you are cool with the whole thing.
The person producing the child porn is infinitely worse.
You got lost buddy. “Sure that’s bad too” was referring to the makers of Grok.
I point of fact my first response was exactly about the predators using Grok.
Hope this helps.
Nope, I got it, I just am now realizing there is something very wrong with you.
You are letting the cp peddler off lighter than it’s users. That means that you are morally deficient. That is the point I was trying to make earlier.
Hope this helps.
Go to my original post and point to where I said anything about letting anyone off. Actually said it. Not didn’t respond the way that you apparently need people to respond to make you comfortable.
You didn’t recently come here via Reddit by chance, did you? Because this is absolutely the most Reddit coded response I’ve seen lately.
When a simple statement gets attacked for not including EVERY possibility for an “um akshually” guy. ::orbital eye roll::
Were you truly not able to deduce that if I made the statement about PREDATORY MEN who used Grok that this included the PREDATORY MEN who enabled that use by Grok as well?
Because “yes that’s bad too” is only the opposite of that in YOUR head, buddy.
I’m not dumbing down how I write and I expect a modicum of intelligence and discernment to elicit anything more than derision on my part. Especially accusations like yours so massage your holier-than-thou attitude.
So just let me know how much help you need understanding simple statements of fact next time before you get yourself all hot and bothered.
That goes for the morons who apparently agreed with this guy.
Jesus.
This has the potential to be some top notch copy pasta.
Who are you ?
Ok, cool story.
Hmm, ok how about “six, seeeeven”?
That more your speed?
LMAO
Guns don’t kill people, etc etc…
Right, because they pull their own triggers, etc., etc…
Edit: To clarify to make absolutely certain you can’t possibly think I’m agreeing with you, I’m not complaining about Grok, although chatbot “AI” are stupid fucking tools for tools, I’m comlaining about the PREDATORS who use chatbots to do sexual deviancy shit. Not unlike the ammosexuals/ICE agents who fantasize about using their ARs to kill women.
I guess I misinterpreted your comment. I thought you were trying to imply that all of the responsibility rested on the badly-behaving users and that the makers of Grok had no responsibility to prevent sexual harassment and CSAM on their platform.
That is exactly what they are saying.
Another weirdo who thinks “and that’s bad too” is a statement of absolution for predators and those who abet them.
Is that because of No Child Left Behind?
Has Lemmy adopted the “um aksuually” guy Reddit standard for writing analysis and media literacy?
No, person of dubious ability to comprehend what you read, this is NOT what I am saying, this is what you want to believe that I am saying. For some bizarre ass reason.
White knighting? Red-pill accusations misdirect?
Please, feel free to explain your logic and thoughts on this.
I am genuinely curious.
Nope. Just think that we should all recognize the root evil here is the Nazi billionaire that is selling a child porn subscription service.
You know. Because Nazi billionaires selling child porn subscription services is a real actual terrible thing.
And what makes you think “and that’s bad too” doesn’t? Seriously. Explain your work.
Was there not enough histrionics or wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth for you?
So explain your logic and thoughts about why you think EVERY FUCKING RESPONSE needs to cater to your whims?
The entire fucking planet knows that Nazi trillionaires selling a service that can be used for child porn, at least be accurate, is BAD. Are you serious right now?
DO you hang around so many Nazi pedos that this needs to be constantly reiterated lest you forget?
Holy moly.
Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.
The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.
That the combination of words that I used to describe shouldn’t even be allowed to exist and will likely be a liner notes in any surviving history.
If we are outraged enough to admonish anyone involved it should be the child porn profiteer, not relegating his moral failings under the broad category of “oh, yea, that’s bad, too.”
The makers of Grok are responsible for all of its sins, yes.
But mostly I was referring to the men who use software like this for those purposes.
But this is nothing new. I’m old enough that I predate even using Photoshop for things like this.
No, the problem is always perverted men.
And for the incels, no, women don’t do shit like that.
I don’t disagree. But my point is that, if creepy, predatory men are so ubiquitous, so shameless, and such a known factor (which anyone with half a brain should agree they are) then isn’t the fastest and most efficient way to minimize harm removing the tools of abuse from the hands of the abusers?
Sigh.
So this is because I didn’t paint with a broad brush and create a plan of action or are we tarring and feathering ANYONE associated with AI now (which I’m totally on board with, btw, just not something I bother writing in every statement I made)?
The most efficient and effective way to minimize hard, in this case, would be chemical castration of all such abusers everywhere. Anything less is just cosplaying justice.
Should I castigate you for NOT making that statement? Does that make you a horrible person who supports sex offenders? Don’t you feel guilty for NOT including that in EVERY reply or post you make?
See how weird that is?
I find it so odd that because I made a statement about the predatory men who fucking use AI to do this you weirdos think this means that doesn’t include Musk and his team who aid and abet them.
Like it’s WEIRD that some of you jumped to that conclusion. It’s not just you. I’ve been posting on the internet since the mid 90s and late stage Reddit was the first time I encountered that kind of thing and I’m not sure where it came from. Maybe it was always there and I just never encountered it until then.
But DAMN it is WEIRD.
I mena, there’s writing analysis and media literacy, and then there’s whatever this wild speculation shit is.
Do better man.
Those drugs are actually of dubious utility unless you are just seeking to cause medical harm to people.
And it has absolutely no bearing on AI. No amount of chemicals will stop grok, and from what I hear Elon’s genitals may already be mangled and useless.
You stop this sort of thing at the source.
Chemical, mechanical, whatever gets you even close to comprehending what I write.
So you’re saying you want to just let these people roam the streets free to molest any little girl they find? Weird.
Good lord, I’m trying, but you can’t seem to get it.
You clearly don’t know enough women.
Clearly you’ve never touched a woman.