Look, I actually have to spend my time around Americans. I dislike them probably more than a lot of people who say stuff like in [https://www.reddit.com/r/TankieTheDeprogram/s/eHww4UALHm](this thread). But it’s not out of lack of trying.
But that’s besides the point. No other country’s people gets treated this way. And no, I’m not going to say I’m more oppressed than people in the global south or whatever. In fact a lot of psychological problems result from the fact that I’m privileged to be in the global north.
But Americans are so often…dismissed. That’s the only term i can come up with. But everyone talks about it in such idealist matter. They always talk individuals or idealism or whatever. The closest to material analysis is “the proletariat’s material conditions are closer aligned to the imperialist Bourgeoisie.” But that doesn’t just apply to Americans.
But, look. Why doesn’t any other people get treated this way? Genuinely. I don’t think Stalin sat down and said “well Germany lost a major world war and went through multiple economic crises and still hasn’t had a socialist revolution. So obviously it’s a lost cause, kill all of them.” Japan and South Korea are never treated this way, despite being very arguably in similar boats. And if we want to talk about material conditions, what about Indonesia or Iran or Cambodia or so many other nations? They haven’t had socialist revolutions yet despite their material conditions, so does that mean these people are useless treatlerites too?
I’m sorry. I know, again, we’re in the imperial core, we’re privileged. I don’t know what part of my mentally ill brain it is, but it’s just that the logic completely fails for me and that gives me anxiety, because reasons. Not just that, but the actual oppression of the communist and self determination movements here are also just ignored.
The North American left is not merely ineffective; it has been structurally neutralized and largely complicit. This is the population most directly sustained by imperial extraction, and it shows. Political activity has been reduced to NGO choreography, permitted marches, and aesthetic outrage that never threatens power. What they call “protest” is often just a safety valve for the system they claim to oppose, angry parades so to speak. Unlike even other imperial-core societies, North America sits at the command center. There is no occupation, no imposed austerity from above, no external pressure forcing confrontation. As a result, the left there has lost even the basic capacity to disrupt. Risk, discipline, and organization have been replaced by moral performance, social capital accumulation, and endless denunciation—while the material machinery of domination continues uninterrupted. From the periphery, this looks obscene. Entire societies are immiserated, destabilized, or destroyed to maintain this system, while those closest to the lever of power treat politics as a lifestyle. The issue is not repression alone; it is that large sections of the “left” are materially invested in stability, whether through labor privileges, NGOs, or proximity to empire. Real struggle would threaten their position, so it never materializes. This is why your comparisons fail. Elsewhere, even under worse conditions, left movements have had to contend with survival, sovereignty, and direct coercion. In North America, the left has been absorbed, declawed, and turned inward. What remains is not a revolutionary force but a managed constituency: loud, angry, and ultimately harmless.
💯
Good post


Good points. The contradictions seem to hold them in place though. On one hand, you have complete militarization, both mentally and physically, you have a relatively comfortable situation for a lot of them but also a huge drug infusion which takes out a large portion of the otherwise probably disruptive groups, you have 24/7 propaganda of the highest quality, the therapy and psychiatric industry which all work stabilizing.
I think its not smart to individualize this situation and try to point at the imperial core leftists. Of course they have to do something and I think a lot will be working on it right now.
Therefore I would rather suggest op turn on their revolutionary optimism and build a local group, join a union and get started.
I’m not individualizing anything. I’m describing a structural condition, seen clearly from outside the imperial core. The U.S. left is shaped by its material position inside empire, not by a lack of sincerity.
Unions are a good example. In the core they’ve been neutralized and folded into labor management. Legalism, no-strike clauses, bureaucratic leadership, and state integration have turned them into tools for disciplining workers and stabilizing capital, not confronting it. They were broken precisely because they were once militant; what remains is the form that empire can tolerate.
“Local groups” follow the same pattern. They’re allowed to exist as long as they stay small, visible, fragmented, and symbolic. NGO logic, surveillance, and subcultural politics keep them inward-facing. Anything disciplined, durable, or capable of escalation is isolated or dissolved. That’s not accidental.
From the periphery, it’s also obvious that the imperial core rarely needs open violence against its own population. Control is mostly psychological and material. Propaganda, career risk, housing insecurity, debt, and social punishment train people to self-censor and self-repress. Fear of losing stability does the job long before police ever have to.
That’s why I feel calls for “optimism” or generic organizing miss the point. The problem isn’t effort; it’s that the dominant forms of organizing in the core are designed to be safe for the system. Until that’s confronted, activity will continue to look radical while remaining harmless.
Yes, my thoughts exactly. I do come to a different conclusion as there is no other option than revolutionary optimism when facing this dire straight. We have the same issue in germany where people are somewhat comfortable, social pressure and “common sense” leads them to self repression. There arent any local groups, there are like two unions and everything else is gone. The reason why i say people need to do local work and use revolutionary optimism is because the situation has changed dramatically since covid and we can use this to gain a better foothold. Building grouls where there were none is a sign that the time wasnt right before and that the situation is giving us an in now. I will definitely keep organizing in a low visibility, highly beneficial to the local people manner as to stengthen the cogesion of the neighborhood and push our ideology.
you have a relatively comfortable situation for a lot of them but also a huge drug infusion which takes out a large portion of the otherwise probably disruptive groups, you have 24/7 propaganda of the highest quality, the therapy and psychiatric industry which all work stabilizing.
Good points. The numbing effect of drugs (both illegal and legal - especially psychopharma) and the therapy industrial complex is often overlooked, but especially in the US these play a crucial role in how the ruling class keeps the population docile and under control, in addition to the more well known methods like propaganda and material treats.
I kept telling therapists I didn’t want a pill to make me feel better about crappy situations, I wanted people to roll up their sleeves and help me fix it. I finally got off all that crap with weed and am off that too. I also am wanting on energy the last year or so.
It’s because rest of the world only sees unbreakable flood of suffering caused by USA and no signs that it is going to stop, and it’s going for decades and it’s gonna soon kill us all and our planet. We as species don’t have another 150 years of waiting if maybe USA workers gonna finally rise, even if we know all the history and circumstances why it is that, as other posters already mentioned.
Not to mention the only window into worker politics in USA we have, internet, is mildly speaking not very encouraging.
It’s not very encouraging from the inside either.
This is a reason why many amerikan Internet communists believe this.
Lots of Internet communists lack discipline/patience etc of being dedicated revolutionaries. They want communists somewhere to be successful but They don’t want to do the extremely difficult task of long term revolutionary organizing, which can take decades to bear fruit, if it ever does. There’s a high chance you will spend time in exile or in prison. And there is never a guarantee of success. Therefore there is a tendency among Amerikan comrades to emphasis the material conditions which make revolutionary organizing difficult in the usa as the reason the Amerikkkan left is inherently useless, and therefore they can justify there spectator-like relationship to politics. They can watch from the side lines and root for the socialists/anti imperialists instead of taking and difficult and dangerous agentic role in politics. (Notably comrades from other countries often do this as well, it’s not solely an American problem)
It is true that the material conditions in the usa do not currently seem conducive to revolution, and that the state of the US revolutionary left is severely underdeveloped to put it politely. However to conclude that the US proletariat/left is entirely useless and should not even try is missing two points. Firstly, we can’t actually tell where revolutions will succeed, least of all decades in advance. Many Bolshevik leaders didn’t think they would live to see a socialist revolution in Russia. If they had given up on the organizing project, concluding that the material conditions were better in Germany or France, there would not have been a Bolshevik revolution in Russia. Secondly, by living in the usa you have many opportunities to disrupt the imperialist war machine, in acts of material solidarity with global anti imperialist forces. Whether or not your organizing actually results in a socialist transformation of the usa (which I hope it does) the opportunity exists to do some serious good.
Many Bolshevik leaders didn’t think they would live to see a socialist revolution in Russia. If they had given up on the organizing project, concluding that the material conditions were better in Germany or France, there would not have been a Bolshevik revolution in Russia.
This part is so so important. People have got to escape doomer/depression thinking about the state of the world; I do not mean that as a “just get better” criticism either. I just mean that it can cause people to see things in a gloomier way than they fully are and feel more pessimistic than is warranted for the situation. Neither pessimism nor blind optimism is something we can afford. The stakes are too high.
Buddy, I’m gonna be upfront with you and not sugar coat it: stop whining about stuff like that during times like this. You have to understand why so many people in that thread have such a hate for americans, including american leftists, your country literally just did a coup and invason. People simply look at your country and how seemingly nothing changes coup after coup, invasion after invasion, overthrow after overthow - your political situation and enviornment isn’t getting any more leftist, in fact the opposite. People expect something, ANYTHING, from you because its your country thats destroying the whole world without any remorse, and those people see no meaningful praxis what so ever. Even your own argument with Germany doesnt work, because Germany had a revolution attempt, only a failed one. What are you looking for exactly? Validation? Coddling? Is this why you’re doing this for, why you are a socialist? Just accept these genuine criticisms of the people of the global south and actually do something that will earn their respect.
It’s stuff like this that bugs me. Stop talking to me like I don’t know this stuff. And better yet stop accusing me of shit that I never said. I don’t need validation or coddling or whatever other thing you’re trying to project onto me. I just don’t like being portrayed as some criminal for existing where i do or living in a country I don’t even want to live in, or constantly being told that my fight is some sort of lost cause. Yknow how many times I’ve been told to “just leave the country?”
Removed by mod
Why not? Let’s see
1.Simultanously I get called a coward for wanting to leave
2.More importantly, I don’t have the money or support to leave. I can barely afford a plane ticket let alone everything else required, and that’s not including friends and family I would really prefer not to leave behind.
I understand, truly. But let me tell you that no serious communist would call you a coward for leaving for a place where actual movement is possible. I didn’t mean to call you a “criminal”, if that’s how it turned out to be, but the environment you’re in simply doesn’t allow for a proper movement. It has been decades, close to a century now, and nothing. And for the money, also understandable. But I genuinely believe this is your real chance at doing something right if you are serious. I’m not telling you to get up and leave right this moment, but trying to do it eventually would be great. I myself am planning to do it and doing everything I can to achieve this goal.
Alright. And it’s not just you. It’s a lot of times that I feel like I get tugged in many directions. One tells me to stay, another tells me to go, one says im a hero in the belly of the beast and another says I’m not even proletarian. I try to figure it out myself, i really do, but it really just doesn’t make sense to me, either side. Maybe it’s part autophobia, part splitting, I don’t know. I just know I don’t trust myself enough to just decide.
I understand that it might be overwhelming, I know and have faith that there are good people in America who want real change, I’d like to assume you are one of them. But I am a deeply religious person who looks at that country with a historical analysis, and I can only conclude that there is something deeply rotten and evil with that culture, you living among it has to have seen it. This is why I’m begging you this: don’t waste yourself there if you are genuine. Many people tried and will keep trying to break it from within, but all I can see in the future is the global south rising up and defeating the evil once and for all. I don’t know if you will listen to me, but I have faith that at least some of what I said touched you. We don’t hate you personally, believe me, but it’s hard to seperate individuals from such a disgusting evil as the United States of America.
This is not a serious argument. Lots of people don’t have the means to simply up and leave. There is also value to continuing to fight from inside the belly of the beast. If nothing else, those on the inside can do far more damage to the machinery of empire through sabotage and direct action than those from outside can do.
This does however take the willingness to take great risks and put your life and what little is left of your freedom on the line. It takes a recognition that a) change through reform is fundamentally impossible in the core and social democratic concessions serve the purpose of pacifying and bribing the population with the spoils of imperial violence, and b) that a revolution in the core will not be possible until conditions get much, much worse, and until then you are simply a “man on the inside” for the revolutionary forces in the global south whose duty it is to agitate the imperial core population against their own government, to sabotage as much as possible the machinery of empire and chip away at its power to suppress revolutionary and anti-colonial movements in those places where most of the revolutionary potential exists right now.
With all due respect, come back to me when the American left will actually become something threatening. Other comments in this thread already explained how there is no real movement that can do real or any damage at all.
The “American left” as a whole is non-threatening to the empire by design. But there is potential for groups such as Palestine Action to form and operate clandestinely in the imperial core.
I understand the importance of internal agents who can serve as sabotage. I am willing to listen and understand, what exactly is the potential of these groups? Are they arming themselves? Are they organizing militians or building encrypted networks?
It’s a learning process. As the state’s repression increases and the illusion of being able to achieve change peacefully dissolves, groups will have to learn to adopt more sophisticated methods and more militant methods.
People will respond to the change in material conditions.
I really wonder, what do you know about government suppression of the left in America?
It’s great and sustained, rendering the whole thing useless with no threat to anything of status quo. I am aware of the situation, this is why my stance is what it is.
deeply unserious
If you say so
we don’t have any fucking money how are we going to move to a different country???
I’m not an American with your material privelege, and I don’t have any money either, and yet I’m trying. I have a moral conviction to do so, my close friend in America has as well. We are trying because we see it as a just and only plausable cause that will benefit everyone eventually. You can dismiss it as unserious all you want, but my lived experiences, faith and personal analysis led me to this belief.
And this is why you were called unserious. Because you answered “literally how can I do this?” with “idk, i can’t either, but you suck if you don’t anyway because of faith”
i did leave, and had to come back because other countries also have immigration laws.
now i’m extremely lucky not to be homeless. i would leave again if i could but i can’t even afford rent consistently. It is not feasible or possible for everyone to leave, and that’s true of every country except a couple of those euro microstates where everyone actually is wealthy.
“If you’re homeless just buy a house” type of energy.
So true, bestie, exactly what I meant.
L
Removed by mod
@DashRendar@lemmygrad.ml The sidebar of this comm literally says “hostility is allowed” and that the only line is reactionary crap or explicit threats. Why was this user banned?
There is no active mod for this community, so one of the admins removed the comment and assigned a one-day temp ban. As far as I know, none of us have greenlit any community to add an exception to rule 3.
Probably should simply close the community if its sole purpose gets people banned (randomly whenever an admin takes personal issue with a user)
Even if we were more lenient with rule 3 in this community, a comment consisting of nothing but an image of a pig taking a shit is just pointlessly inflammatory
All my comrades say Death To Amerikkka. If you can’t honestly look at what the US is, what it does, and how its people think, and say the same thing, then I’m not going to take you seriously at all.
If there’s anything legit communists living the imperial core should agree on, it’s how brainwormed, apathetic and generally dogshit the supposed “left” there is. Half the country is openly fascist and the rest think liberalism is the opposite of fascism.
I don’t mind “death to amerikkka.” I have no love for the country. Its just…the people? I mean I get it. I deal with it every week. I see it with my own eyes. And yet, I still believe, because it’s all the same structure. It’s all the same problems we’ve been dealing with for hundreds of years. It’s not really all that different.
And then the other part is just acting like we don’t have problems here. Like ICE is literally abducting people off the street, I’m afraid for my family’s safety and actively trying to find ways to get them out and trying to convince them to get out, and over half the country lives below the poverty line. It’s not *the worst," and I’ll never claim that, but not everyone is a TikTok girly living in a New York apartment drinking Starbucks every day.
An org in my city was just recently talking about how theyve gotten hundreds of new visitors, and they literally just started last year. They’re not DSA, they’re a genuine marxist org. I want to try, that’s all
Its just…the people? I mean I get it. I deal with it every week. I see it with my own eyes.
So there’s no real benefit to pretending or writing apologia for them, right? This is not a path of idealism, so lets let go of that before it gets in the way.
because it’s all the same structure. It’s all the same problems we’ve been dealing with for hundreds of years. It’s not really all that different.
Can you simplify / clarify this? I feel like there a multiple interpretations and I don’t like relying on my own assumptions.
And then the other part is just acting like we don’t have problems here. Like ICE is literally abducting people off the street […] over half the country lives below the poverty line.
I really don’t think there’s anyone here who isn’t acutely aware of there late-stage capitalist rot the empire has been experiencing. From worsening to material conditions to state violence, I think you’ll find plenty of people here that may as well be experts in the matter, as much as such a thing exists.
not everyone is a TikTok girly living in a New York apartment drinking Starbucks every day.
Is that what you think the tankie critique of america is?
they’re a genuine marxist org. I want to try, that’s all
Hatred of the US empire really isn’t incompatible with that. I don’t see why, as a marxist, you wouldn’t share the perspective the rest of the world has about where you probably had no choice in being born. The rest of the world hates and fears the violent depravity of your country for pretty obvious reasons. You’re not obligated to try to soften that image for the sake of optimism, but you will re-enforce your reputation as a specific liberal stereotype if you do.
i think one of the most integral parts of correctly-applied marxism is understanding that the masses make history, and that the masses are rational: that the masses act and think in service of their material interests, wherever they lie in the multifaceted world of class contradictions. that means to accept the fact that, were you truly able to live in another’s shoes you would think and act exactly like they do, having experienced the same experiences and totality of material interests.
this applies to all the people you’re complaining about: of course non-americans would complain about the actions of the most successful and exploitative empire, and the global hegemon for decades. even within the global north non-americans get the short end of the stick, let alone the more exploitative relationship between the US and the global south. it makes sense that these people would be frustrated for this reason
but, this also applies to americans as well: of course revolutionary politics, theory and organization would be the weakest in the state in which people on the whole have the most to lose from upending the global status quo. this is complicated by the settler-colonial nature of the US, meaning that in a sense there is both internal and external imperialism, but i think most can agree that external imperialism is primary given the lack of revolutionary movement.
the correct marxist analysis accepts the validity of both sides, and synthesizes them. if history is any guide (which as marxists it definitely should be), then imperialism is the primary class contradiction globally, socialist revolutions are more likely (and perhaps only initially possible) in countries in which capital and the bourgeoisie is less developed, the proletariat’s anti-bourgeois class interests are aligned with anti-imperialism class interests, and countries in which imperialist class contradictions are particularly acute. non-socialist, anti-imperialist revolutions are still historically progressive.
for the most part, the material conditions in the US are the exact opposite of this, so anyone expecting revolution to occur within the US is anti-historical. anyone attributing its actions, the complacency of its inhabitants, or the backwards nature of its theory to a unique “evil” is not a marxist: the masses are just acting and thinking in accordance with their material interests.
i do think as the world becomes more legitimately multipolar the imperialist nature of internal american relations represents a relatively unique opportunity for revolutionary change, compared to europe for example. however, the vestiges of american hegemony would need to dissipate first: dollar hegemony, global military hegemony, etc., and we’re just not there yet.
in the meantime, instead of action for action’s sake, i think the best thing people can do within the imperial core and america specifically is to become disciplined, expert communists. if we truly think socialism is scientific then it can only come to be via the same expertise and academic rigor within the natural sciences. learn how to study, study, and study with others. use that expertise to write, edit and publish theory to advance scientific socialism within the imperial core. without revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement.
Excellent commentary, comrade. The crux of the issue isn’t that the masses are correct or moral, but rational, and in the US Empire they just aren’t at that revolutionary moment yet. However, a historic opportunity is most likely coming, and the task is to prepare for this so that they don’t squander it. Advancing scientific socialism, agitating among the masses against imperialist aggression, and building disciplined and serious cadre to lead that mass movement are the only ways this historic opportunity can succeed.
thank you! for the most part i agree with you: i really see party formation as the first and primary task, because the more i investigate existing parties in the US the more i am disappointed in them. lack of internal party democracy coupled with incorrect theory and incorrect application of theory to material conditions in the US (not recognizing settler-colonialism as the primary internal contradiction, not understanding patriarchy as a set of class relationships in relation to reproductive labor, etc) makes for ossified, non-revolutionary organizations. and, i think studying and using studying as an organization tool is the first and primary task of party formation: how can we learn to build our own party without having thoroughly and collectively learned from all successful attempts at revolutionary party formation?
and yeah, i think not just one but many historic opportunities are on the horizon for the next century or two, because i think it will take multiple acts of spontaneous unrest for the masses to come to the correct conclusion. and these will obviously increase in likelihood the worse material conditions in the core become, whether via increasing multipolarity possibly leading to a world war, or climate change (which as a ticking time bomb is both a gift and a curse), or other means. but i think for success ultimately two things must occur: global north masses’ material interests must align with those in the global south more than not, and a truly revolutionary party must be present and organized enough to make the masses aware of this qualitative development the moment it occurs. the former will happen sooner for those more exploited within the core (black, indigenous, latino, but also queer and disabled folk), making a multi-vector class analysis critical for any revolutionary org within the core.
Very well said!
This is hands down the best perspective I have ever read on the imperial core. THIS is how I understand marxism after like 10 Books or more and praxis. I aspire to become this good at analysis and concise at formulating the results.
thank you, i really appreciate that! i definitely enjoy writing and analysis, but like everyone have a lot to learn before i truly consider myself a practicing scientific socialist. we’re all in this struggle together!
And humble too! o7
Tbf I say similar things about my country (Guatemala) and Latin America as a whole. I feel our settler-colonial culture and how many are easily swayed by American cultural exports leaves us as nearly a lost cause with only the indigenous really attempting something resembling leftism.
I would like to add that Afro-Latinos are usually also pretty left-wing and well organized, same for some feminist/lgbtq+ groups.
Oh…i didn’t think it was that bad down there. I mean, Argentina sure, but the rest?
Chile just elected the son of a ratline Nazi. Ecuador is run by a US puppet druglord. Take a look at a map of US military and CIA bases in Colombia and take a wild guess at how it produces so much cocaine. The anti-communist massacres, coups and purges of Op Condor never really ended, which brings us to the present moment with Venezuela. It’s very hard to build any socialist momentum when the Fourth Reich keep kicking over your sandcastles.
Don’t forget, every time a socialist goverment or even a social democrat goverment appears here the US does everything possible to destroy them.
Argentina sure, but the rest?
Bolivian leader Morales, of an indigenous background if I recall correctly, was an amazing leader for his country; the white party that
replacedcouped him literally had a leader who called the indigenous population Satan worshippers and were (libertarian?) American vassals.I think you’re confusing Quiroga with Paz a bit. Paz (he is mestizo not white) is the libertarian us bootlicker and Quiroga (he is white) is the openly racist far-right US bootlicker. Evo was replaced by Luis Arce who is a socdem and also native american. Evo’s vp was also a white Bolivian.
I looked it up and it was an interim president, Jeanine Anez
I thought you meant as leader of the political party MAS not as president of Bolivia.
Argentina is not as conservative as countries like Paraguay or Peru (still pretty bad but not as racist as the US or Canada. They did try to erase mestizo and black history in Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil for many years). Paraguay have been ruled by the same political party since 1954, 80% of the population hate the LGBTQ+, the US made sure to keep in power a literal pedophile until 1989. Paraguay actively wanted to participate on the Vietnam war and genocide against Palestinians.
That dudes post got removed and people were shitting on it pretty good. And they were right to do so. That sounded like wrecker shit. Like, that sub has what? Maybe 40k subscribers on the high end and not all those are even Americans. There’s 300 million americans. So a fraction of a percent of them are active in that sub, and all of these people would agree that America is evil. And then this person’s plan is to… Attack the fraction of a percent of Americans that is actually on the right side?
Going into a leftists sub, with Americans that pretty much agree that America fucking sucks, and then attacking Americans for sucking? At best it’s achieving literally nothing because everyone there agrees Americans suck, so it’s just a rage induced circle jerk. The at worst, you are directly attacking the few people in that nation that’s on your side, and are actually trying to support actual socialism, while being surrounded by, as their post specifically details, are the worst people on the planet. So like, nothing benefiting the movement can come of that post.
People see american bombs hitting their towns, american weapons slaughtering their neighbors and then go on youtube or to the movies and see americans living in their sunny condos enjoying a 40 pound double extra cheese bacon whopper mukbang while they starve due to sanctions.
The american working class movement is very small, barely relevant and not visible outside a few cities. Most popular leftist content from america are radlibs tricking people into voooting and supporting american imperialism with a human face (aka bombs for Caracas, buses for new york)
damn. that one rips. thank you for the concise perspective, comrade. o7
I’m increasingly losing my patience with my own ostensible peers, but I have to remind myself that most people aren’t gonna alter the course of history - hell, most groups won’t, either. That just makes the little stuff we can do all the more important.
Based on what I’ve seen, it appears like more of a self-hatred problem than it is people outside of the imperial core focusing overly much on the individuals who inhabit it.
I think there are some misconceptions though, which contribute to a sense of near-hopelessness in reference to the imperial core. Such as:
-
“The empire living off the exploitation of others necessarily means the people living in it are well off and so the rest of the world has to do a revolution before they would ever be motivated to.” On inspection, many of them are increasingly not well off and some are part of a marginalized group on top of that (such as black people in the US).
-
“People in the US have never really tried.” The US is for sure the most virulent anti-communist there is in the world and it derives from a genocidal colonial project that transformed into a global imperial one. After saying that, it’s easy to stop and go “look at how it (seemingly) is now, a handful of weak reformists doing nothing.” But the one feeds into the other. The US had the red scare (well had, more like has ongoing) which vilified anything even slightly “leftist.” The Black Panther Party tried to build a vanguard party with dual power and faced assassination, imprisonment, vilification, infiltration, and so on. Earlier in its history, there’s the Civil War, which I won’t romanticize and pretend was some grand liberation struggle the white power brokers were partaking in, but it is important to note because post-Civil-War did not repress or dismantle the confederacy side properly and they went on to do things like romanticize slavery via The United Daughters of the Confederacy material pushed in schools. So it’s not just that USians (some way more than others) benefit materially from imperialism, it’s also that it has faced enormous internal political repression and a kind of ongoing aggravated internal state between the slave owner faction and the reform faction (and what those factions developed into later on). And it’s not only “non-white” who have ever tried anything. Eugene Debs is a notable socialist name, one who ran for president while being imprisoned over an anti-war speech. The Battle of Blair Mountain is a notable event of how the US state was willing to join in on waging class war against its own people (white included).
-
“It has been this way so far, so it will keep being this way.” Change requires transformation, but it is possible. However, it also requires assessment of where things are going wrong and how to do different in a way that will work. When CriticalResist made the point some time back that so many imperial core parties are “ossified and failures” (I believe was the wording), I had an initial desire to push back. I think because I was concerned it was being too demoralizing a picture of ongoing struggle. But we do have to be sober about real failures and the goal of a vanguard party is not to figure out how to cozy up and co-exist with imperialism while doing some token opposition in the margins. So it’s more about movement than it is about judgment. People are going to judge and we will too, but at the end of the day, things are moving. Question is where do they get moved to.
-
Deserved!

I used to think that American leftists were selfish cowards for choosing to live with their privileges at the expense of everyone else.
But seeing those privileges stripped away as the imperial core becomes fascist and turns its wrath inward, I started to realise they’re not selfish cowards, they’re just cowards.
Probably my worst, most hateful take. But so many of my family have suffered from American greed that I don’t care. I will burn all my bridges and die on this hill.
Amerikkkans (and all denizens of the imperial kkkore kkkanadians, Euroisians etc.) are materially tied to the superexploitation of the periphery even if the percentage of spoils they are individually receiving is diminishing year on year as the fangs of the empire turn inwards. They still comfort themselves with thoughts of at least we’re not [country actively being destroyed and superexploited by the empire].
A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.
















