Ad hominem attacks without specifics are hard to engage with civilly. Are you asking for a link of a professor who fed their lesson plan to ai and had it pass the cpa?
Nah I’m good, was able to find it on my own. The thing it misses is that what people call “AI” isn’t deterministic, since it has no sense of actual meaning (it is, after all, just an evolution of your phone keyboard’s word prediction, just with an enormous amount of both data and compute). So it could pass an exam one time, then fail it right after even if the conditions don’t change. It hallucinates. A lot. So your idea of an “AI knowledge base” is flawed by design.
You seem to be hallucinating even more than “AI”, which I wasn’t sure was possible, but here we are.
Ad hominem attacks without specifics are hard to engage with civilly. Are you asking for a link of a professor who fed their lesson plan to ai and had it pass the cpa?
Nah I’m good, was able to find it on my own. The thing it misses is that what people call “AI” isn’t deterministic, since it has no sense of actual meaning (it is, after all, just an evolution of your phone keyboard’s word prediction, just with an enormous amount of both data and compute). So it could pass an exam one time, then fail it right after even if the conditions don’t change. It hallucinates. A lot. So your idea of an “AI knowledge base” is flawed by design.