ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.socialM to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 days agoCollege Students Furious When Their Course Is Taught by AI Instead of a Professorfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1437arrow-down14
arrow-up1433arrow-down1external-linkCollege Students Furious When Their Course Is Taught by AI Instead of a Professorfuturism.comThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.socialM to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square65linkfedilink
minus-squareJankatarch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 day agoEven following that logic, putting in effort to learn hallucinated material will not result well. Let me clarify, we should ask for both. We should want non-AI professors AND non-cheating students. In the failure of second case, a good 96% of students are wrong by the end of the semester. (Yes cheating in CS is that bad) In the failure of first case, EVERY student is wrong by the end of the semester. Even the ones that put in effort.
minus-squareMourningDove@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·1 day agoIt would be an assumed given that whatever curriculum was being taught would have been proofed beforehand. And yes. We should expect both. I’m simply saying that from my perspective- more people are hurt by people using LLM to cheat exams.
Even following that logic, putting in effort to learn hallucinated material will not result well.
Let me clarify, we should ask for both. We should want non-AI professors AND non-cheating students.
In the failure of second case, a good 96% of students are wrong by the end of the semester. (Yes cheating in CS is that bad)
In the failure of first case, EVERY student is wrong by the end of the semester. Even the ones that put in effort.
It would be an assumed given that whatever curriculum was being taught would have been proofed beforehand.
And yes. We should expect both. I’m simply saying that from my perspective- more people are hurt by people using LLM to cheat exams.