‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘
Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01
Well, no, it has no opinions. But it can compare it to other work, and determine what patterns are considered good or bad, and that’s not too different from a designer putting together a board of trends–or being Quentin Tarantino. It can tell by comparison if something is clearly communicated or clunky or funny, and and then you can either listen, or ignore it.
And it can either treat me like a 12 year old with Down Syndrome, or like a creative who can take criticism.
I’m 100% certain it would be completely useless to Stephen King, but I’m new to this.