Usually it’s the reverse, so that would be a welcome change.
What with the color palette? That’s a 2010ish thing.
And THANK FUCK for that, if you can have a minimal UI and still make the game ergonomically playable, then I love you and shall worship you till the death of the universe.
I remember people were literally praising Elden ring for it’s minimal UI while clowning on other companies with memes like “If Elden ring was made by Ubisoft”
Also, we dulled the color palette.
Be happy it’s not Holywood style TEAL AND ORANGE EVERYWHEREEEEE!!!
At least it’s not a bad as it was in the 2010s. That era also had all the copious shaky cam. Awful era.

Generally I find it’s the opposite?
The start of the franchise is a minimalist work of art. The 5th entry is a bloated completionist campaign with a million ways to burn time and zero ways to enjoy doing so
I hate when they remove hud elements and do fuck all else to convey relevant info about shit you can’t see. Like they remove the hud elements that tell you what direction you’re being attacked from while also having the absolute worst fucking sound design ever so absolutely none of your senses work.
Mirror’s Edge (2008) looks like the one on the right, and is an absolute work of art IMO. The sequel sucks tho
Man I feel like mirrors edge was a cult classic, my firat game on ps3 and one of my favorites. It was such a different game and the art and music were amazing.
Mirror’s Edge is not steampunk. It was futuristic with strong primary colors, and the aesthetic was consistent throughout the entire game including the HUD and menus. That’s why it looks like the image on the right.
doesn’t have to be steampunk, the meme was playing on the fact that games used to have really over-the-top HUDs back in the 2000s
get wooshed
Wooshed? It’s pretty obvious that the image on the right is not only minimalist, it’s also “modern” with the sans-serif font. You assume you could do a minimalist steampunk HUD.
Really it should be Epic Steampunk Adventure Remastered Edition*
*
*We unlisted the original game from every platform and every shill YouTuber will do the marketing for us of convincing people this is definitely the superior product.
Also, we dulled the color palette.
Not sure about that one. 2008 was firmly inside the “make everything brown for realism” era of videogames.
You know, you’re right. We sort of went from dull brown to dull gray since then - at least for first person shooters.
Mayber “darker” is a more apt criticism than duller.



They all just went LOOK AT ME, I’M DOING HDR!!! while a fuck of a lot of systems can’t
Yes, but also…



The main consistent difference I’m seeing here is contrast. The more modern versions have darker darks and brighter brights, with less midrange.
I miss the midrange in games. I’m tired of half my screen being streaking white or pitch black. Give me the midrange curves again!
Some games let you change this in settings. Adjusting screen settings can also help.
It works for Demon’s souls because it’s a dark fantasy game and the new graphics absolutely nail that vibe.
You would find more colour in the mud at Passchendale.
laughs in quake
Wait, it’s just brown?
Always has been
I would say it went from maybe moody (this might not be the right term, but something like it) and more manufactured, to now being more realistic. Better technology has allowed games to have lighting that gets very close to reality, especially with ray-tracing. It sometimes comes with the cost of creative control though.
I wouldn’t say either is bad. They can both be amazing or shit depending on how they’re used. It’s easy to pick the best or worst offenders from either to make whichever one you want to look good though.
I still dislike the piss filter
The brown thing is a myth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTjGDkDI49I
Even Elex had a brown-grey filter.
This should tell you there is a flaw somewhere.

Maybe the perception of brownness comes from things that aren’t supposed to be brown and grey; nobody looks at a basketball court or a sun-bathed road and says “This is abnormally brown”. If Gears of War, CoD, FO3, Doom 3, GTA4 aren’t coming up, you haven’t calculated the thing they’re talking about.
Interesting video, but I disagree that it proves that the “brown thing is a myth”. I was around back then and it was definitely a thing that was also being heavily criticized.
The thing is that with the methodology that guy employs, I guess it wouldn’t really be visible. The “brown game” aesthetic, while definitely a trend, wasn’t the only trend during that time. At the same time, you had the explosion of colorful Nintendo casual games on platforms like the Wii and DS. Many of those sold extremely well, so they’d be overrepresented when you only take the top 20 bestselling games of each year. Same with sports games, those never really change much, but they’ll show up heavily on every top 20. But with games that wanted to seem more “mature” and especially genres like first-person shooters (like in the meme), the trend was very real.
deleted by creator
Too bad for you.
It’s also an echo chamber if you only consider the games you played are the only valid options.
Best selling is best selling and represents the general consensus. Whether you like it or not.
If you only consider a platform or a genre, you are narrowing the scope. Which is not the point of an industry average.You think ignoring what games were actually on the market in favour of only the best selling games is the right way to make a conclusion about the general quality of all games on the market?
It’s also an echo chamber if you only consider the games you played are the only valid options.
I mean, you couldn’t be more wrong lol. I played the colorful Nintendo games back then and mostly hated on all the brown PS/XBox stuff (unfairly, there were some gems among those).
If you only consider a platform or a genre, you are narrowing the scope. Which is not the point of an industry average.
Using just the top 20 narrows it too. But my point is more that an taking an average doesn’t prove whether a trend existed or not. And somehow I don’t think that the creator of the meme was thinking of Nintendogs and Wii Sports.
Not really. Mid-2000s was the exact time when mainstream gamemakers discovered shaders, but the power of those was only enough for a rough filter thrown over everything. So, armed with the solution, developers looked for the problem that it would solve, and decided that making games look grittier is just what’s needed. ‘Need for Speed: Most Wanted’ from 2005 was a major offender in this.
That was very much a repetition of the Great Browning of mid-late nineties, when textures got detailed enough that devs likewise sought to apply them as much as they could, and did that by using textures of dirty brown ground, scratched brown stone, and nicely looking brown wood. Particularly in FPS games like Quake 1—3. Can’t really showcase the textures with smooth-looking walls in bright colors, and few people were gonna make dozens of assorted textures for a variety of environments.
you had a flattening of video game color for sure, wether it was the brown mill sims like COD, the green of fallout 3, or the yellow of deus ex human revolution. and few very influential games ‘color’ our memories.
at the same time you have your oblivion surreal super contrast color explosion. compared to nows muted rerelease. before, the mono coloring was a stylistic choice, and now it’s a tapping into the game engines realism settings
I think it’s interesting to attempt to analyze and chart this, but his analysis isn’t the end. One notable failure, in my opinion, is he attempts to calculate the average browness (and other variables), not the percentage of games that have a lot of brown. Average browness largely measures outliers.
Also, not excluding sports games, and things like that, is ignoring a large part of what people discuss with this. The argument isn’t that all games were more brown then. It’s largely that shooters, or action games in general at most, were more brown than other years.
Basically, saying it’s a myth (despite it being a well-recognized thing at the time) referencing one source isn’t correct. At most you can make the statement that some data implies it’s a myth. I highly suspect the methodology here is not accurate to what the actual understanding is. It’s a good effort, but it is not the end of the discussion.
I like the mini debate here about UI. I think less UI is winning, and for good reason in FPS games where visual real estate matters more than status info. I kind of feel we’ve gone too far in 3rd person ARPGs, though-- specially in removing minimaps and to a lesser extent quest log stuff for games with side quests and collectables.
At the end of the day, how important is that visual real estate? MMOs and RTS, yeah, not important. FPS and some other 3D games? Important. But there’s definitely a middle ground I want explored more for ARPGs and any other game with info that goes beyond ammo counts and health.
One thing ubisoft does right is the hud options. Can go from crazy everything to minimal/ nothing and all between.
I’m fine with less info in RPGs as well as ARPGs. In particular I’m kinda happy if there’s no minimap to constantly be glancing at and even moreso if there are no quest markers. Put me in the world and make me learn it! Usually there’s still the big map for when you’re lost.
Kinda depends on if there’s visual cues and how linear things are, too, I suppose. No minimaps and terrible visual cues as to where to go make for an annoying experience, but use of lighting and stuff can do just fine otherwise.
Though I’m a bit of a completionist so missing any little thing bugs me, haha. But that’s a personal taste.
There’s definitely a balance to it. I don’t need 25 different meters and markers and quests and reminders, but I’m also one that does like just having the “go here arrow” because I can’t game nearly as much as I want to and remembering all the minor details can be hard
“Gotta find that item”
30 seconds later
“Hmm, that items gotta be around here somewhere”
30 seconds later
“I can’t be messing around right now, gotta find that item.”
5 seconds later
“Hmm, I wonder if the item is in the location it’s in”
Also, include these dialogues in a game where there are hidden collectibles, so you have to hear that fuckass dialogue repeat while trying to make sure you don’t miss anything, only to accidentally take the correct path instead of the secret path with the collectible because the secret path was more obvious than the main path so you guessed that the most hidden one was for the collectible…
I’M COMPLETELY FINE
Exactly, lol.
I want my games to have very obvious in-game or UI elements showing me which way is the ‘correct’ storyline path to take. Not because I want it to be easy to find the correct path – because I want to make sure I avoid the correct path while I explore elsewhere, and I don’t accidentally trigger the next storyline event before collecting all the loot in this stage.
This is easily my biggest pet peeve in modern games. At some point major game devs decided players couldn’t be trusted in any way and have to be pushed, cajoled, and hand-held through the game. Nevermind that those same devs spent untold hours and days filling in the game environments and world with details that are well worth admiring - it’s clearly better for players to be nagged at incessantly to keep to the path allotted for the prescribed experience. And if they are on that path, they better be reminded what they’re doing a million times anyhow. Uggghh. 🙄
Lmao, we remember 2008 games waaaay differently XD
Fallout 3 GTA IV
The piss colored pile of afterbirth that is the Gears of War series….
Piss coloured? It was gray / brown. And those are good games!
Hey man, if you get your jimmies off from a bunch of roid rage NFL wannabes running around a blurry construction site full of waist high walls whilst shooting at the same half dozen bug creatures be my guest
But I draw the line at insulting my piss, I worked hard for that glorious cinereal hue
But joking aside, I just fundamentally disagree that this fascination with sucking all the color out of games is a recent thing.
The one on the left is BioShock. For the parts where you play as the Big Daddy you even see the insides of your diving helmet.
BioShock was 2007 /reeeee
Also it doesn’t fit because they thoroughly shit that franchise to death more than a decade ago
The whole meme is contrived to begin with, so I doesn’t merit deep analysis, but it just rubs me the wrong way when someone tries to twist the past to fit their narrative, I was there dog, you can’t fool me
And the right is way better. Minus the color thing.
If I wanted a menu simulator, I’d play an RTS or MMO.
Bonus points when left still displays everything in the same number of pixels on your 4k screen as it did on a 480 CRT.
4K monitors are a bad idea. Beyond half a million pixels, there are diminishing returns, new video games don’t look that much better and it makes older games look worse. By the time you get to 8 million pixels, only eagles and fighter pilots might sorta notice a difference.
I noticed this trend when I went from 800x600 to 1024x768 to 1080p. I ain’t touching 4K. It’ll just ruin your life.
I respect your opinion, but 1080p upscales better on a 4k monitor than a 2k (1440p) one.
No, you can absolutely notice a difference. Especially if you need to emulate a CRT. Having 15 LCD pixels to mimic the smearing of each CRT pixel from a 256x192 display looks way better than having fewer than 9.
4K and 8K monitors are the new Monster cables.
Monster cables literally didn’t make a difference, you can immediately see the difference on a 4K vs 2K vs 1080.
Especially if you need to read a bunch of small text.
They said the same type of things about Monsters cables.
It was visibly false with Monster cables, do you know anyone with a 1080p+4K monitor setup you can look at? The difference is really obvious with multi-monitor setups. Hell just try reading small text, it has to be way bigger on the 1080 before your eyes are straining to read it.
Also again, emulation, look really closely at a pixel on a CRT. Trying to copy the depth effects with 9 or fewer LCD pixels just isn’t possible.
While I do wish they’d keep the visual styling, I personally feel we should aim for a less cluttered HUD in games. There are so many games where it feels insanely satisfying to rock HUDless and just feel like you’re in direct control of the action.
If you can integrate your HUD into the lore to make it part of the story, you get bonus points.
Mirror’s Edge Catalyst does this by using an eye contact based system called BeatLink, which is the Runner’s version of the Conglomerate’s Gridlink. The game lets you disable most or all of the HUD features, and mods allow you to hide the rest. They also have options to adjust the amount of handholding it does. I’m a huge fan!
The other part of it is that it’s much easier now to dynamically render UI elements when necessary, which removes much of the need for a HUD with dedicated portions of the screen for information.
I’d be interested to see a demake of a modern game on the PS1 or something that packs as many modern QoL improvements as possible into it.
I really like that about a lot of Helldivers 2. There are screens on workstations that you need to control and the screens show what you need to do. Not a popup in your HUD. Also, there are ammo counters on a lot of weapons visible in first person mode, and a lot of other details to give you hints about your status without having it in the HUD.
No wait I like this. Kinda. Less UI in games please!
Nearly every game I’ve worked on since the mid 2000s has started with someone saying “this time it’ll be hudless” We do a bunch of work on some kind of HUD replacement, and then testers and focus groups come back with “I couldn’t figure out where to go,” “I couldn’t see the enemies,” “it’s very confusing.”
You need to do the art very differently to make a modern game readable without UI. To a lot of art directors and focus groups, UI is less immersion breaking than the art changes that readability without it requires. Not saying it’s impossible. Just requires a mind shift that AAA appears unwilling to take.
The only game I’ve played that really managed to pull of HUD-less was Dead Space. They really thought through the game design and interactions, it’s just a masterfully crafted game. I believe Dead Space 2 is almost entirely in a single continuous camera shot as well, kinda bonkers.
The only game I can even think of that’s hudless is Astroneer and it took me like 30 hours to notice. Can’t imagine how hard that is to do well
No ambitions for a hudless, waypoint-less gameplay system survive playtesting. There’s friction and then there’s watching someone do the same loop around for 30 minutes. I once watched a streamer play a game I worked on. The level artists had meticulously and organically sign posted where to go - like pulled out all the stops with lighting and directionality of the environment. Stopping just short of putting any yellow paint anywhere. The streamer still fucked it up.
Why would you watch DSP?!?
(Sorry, couldn’t resist)
Dyson Sphere Program?
That level of lack of perception could only point to MATN.
Yeah … can UI be overdone? Sure. But in most cases, I still want a HUD-type UI, at least a little bit.
The best games out there give the player granular options to enable or disable specific UI elements, so you can have as much or as little UI as you want, and if some particular element is annoying you, you can disable it.
I love it. I mod out my UIs to be as minimal as possible. Especially games like Skyrim. No map, press button to pull up compass. No numbers or letters on screen. A small health, mana, or stam bar comes up only when not full.
Same. I want my Skyrim to be more like morrowind
My thoughts too. I often try to remove some/most of the UI if the game allows it just for realism and so that I have less distractions
It’s fine so long as they don’t just move it into some pause menu I’m then forced in and out of constantly to get information.
Be sure to pre-order the Ultimate edition to get the exclusive limited edition gold-plated revolver.
Prince of Persia (2008) – Epilogue DLC
The base game ended on a highly impactful, emotional cliffhanger where the Prince chooses to save his lover, Elika, at the cost of unleashing an ancient evil upon the world. It was an incredibly bold ending. However, Ubisoft decided to sell the game’s actual conclusion separately as the Epilogue DLC. Worse still, the DLC managed to completely undo the narrative tension of the base game, making Elika upset at the Prince for saving her before she abruptly leaves him. To add insult to injury, the DLC was never even released for PC players, leaving them permanently stuck with a cliffhanger.
The edgy DmC reboot did the same thing, though I think the DLC was included in the Definitive Edition that was released later for every platform.
Game not included
















