• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Everything spies on you now LOL.

      If you’re reading this on your phone, guess what? Your phone is spying on you. Turn off your phone and watch some TV. Your TV is spying on you.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    An SUV for that price… In sure Chinese sweatshop factory workers are paid fairly and work in safe conditions and get regular breaks, vacations, aock leave, etc… Right?

    Because if not, you’d be buying products from slavery yet somehow I don’t see that argument very much

    • PoopMonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not denying sweatshops over there, but it’s highly likely these are mostly built by robots in empty buildings.

    • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They are doing something though, it’s called long term planning.

      It annoys me so much that the western world has stopped doing it and is just thinking short term.

  • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Can we just fucking STOP doing SUVs please? And huge trucks. And all the rest of that oversized garbage.

    • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But I like being able to see over everyone else

      • everyone

      At this point I’m planning to see under everyone else.

    • stumu415@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Xiaomi first car is an amazing sport sedan: SU7. Followed by my personal favorite, the YU7. Actually the SU7 has been the best selling car in China for a few months.

      The Skynomad, this new SUV, strangely is not marketed as Xiaomi but purely as Skynomad. They have separate stores, whereas the SU7 and YU7 are in the normal Xiaomi stores, between the phones fridges and laptops. Definitely a different target audience so that could be the strategy. It doesn’t have a Xiaomi badge either.

      The same goes for Huawei, who have a whole suit of different models and types of cars. The most insane one, from innovation perspective, is the Maestro, a competitor for Rolls-Royce.

    • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Most of these these new SUVs aren’t huge SUVs of the 90s - like Ford Explorer. They’re basically the new station wagon but barely larger than a sedan like a Camry.

      • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        A crossover is a station wagon but the entire thing is raised up for no reason. It’s funny how averse the public is to driving a minivan. I drove one as a rental for a week and it was snappy, convenient, comfortable, and could hold a ton of stuff or people.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      But without SUVs, people would be embarrassed driving minivans and without huge trucks, there would be nothing to compensate for small penises.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think people who have never driven one or feel uncomfortable getting one and gets one because they feel they’re getting more for their money shouldn’t be driving them at all.

      I think people who want one should rent one that way they have practice and they have to be careful with the vehicle because it’s on loan but the one thing I noticed when just about everyone switched to mini-suv’s and full sized ones and trucks, that there’s more people who have never driven one in their life and it’s noticeable.

      I just don’t want to be hit by someone who has no idea how to manage driving one because of their size and depth perception being thrown off other than that who gives a fuck what people drive. If someone wants to drop money on something stupidly oversized and uses a fuckload of gas, let em.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Thankfully in the US we won’t get the choice because they’re not allowed to sell here to protect our domestic producers from competition so we can just give them more money the next time they need to be bailed out.

      • boonhet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They pretty much do the same in China. Tesla I believe is or was the only foreign manufacturer allowed to own their Chinese business. Everyone else had to set up a Chinese subsidiary majority owned by a Chinese automaker.

        Nothing stopping Xiaomi from doing the same with Ford or GM in the US as far as I know?

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    25 minutes ago

    Claps to some of the people here thinking Mainland China is “perfection”.

  • twisted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’ll be banned faster than you can memorize the spelling of Xiaomi. At least in the US, where we make sure the old inefficient companies stay afloat despite their incompetence.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The thing is, if the American government wants to be protectionist against Chinese cars, IMHO they need to pass legally binding legislation to force US car manufacturers to meet or exceed what the Chinese cars are offering and then directly subsidize the cost of those vehicles to the consumer, freely, with no stipulations. The punishment for failure to meet and exceed those expectations should be bankruptcy through immediate removal of the protectionist mechanisms.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The US is too busy licking other corps boots. They do not have enough funds to do it for everyone.

        They’d probably need to tax the rich a significant amount of money to do that.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they’re so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition out of the market before charging basically whatever they want.

      I’ve seen Starbucks do the same thing to independent coffee shops.

      Edit: This is a post about real car companies like Nissan, Volvo, Mercedes, Renault, whatever. I don’t care about America. Nobody has for decades.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they’re so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition

        Used to be, to get them going, robotics, innovation and vertical integration is most of the reason now. An example, BYD have their own roro ships and have ordered another 10,

        https://www.whichcar.com.au/news/byd-orders-10-more-car-carriers-export-push-accelerates

        and the new ships will be built in China

        they make their own batteries, electric motors etc and have massive robotic assembly plants.

        To suggest the reason why is because it’s not a level playing field is ludicrous, the US spends many billions subsidizing car manufacturers on top of the billions us consumers spend in subsidizing them. directly.

      • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Frankly, american cars could use a knockdown. Tesla was our only real hope, and we would have glided into a strong Tesla and EV empire if conservative dems didn’t bail out GM, Chrysler, and Ford. Additionally, Tesla wouldn’t have been in a position to get bought by a dumb nazi.

        I’d say, let their stuff in. Lets get some good cheap and subsidizes vehicles from China on the condition that they don’t raise car prices by more than 2% a year.

        American companies will more than likely fall on their face and hopefully die. Making room for a new american car company to take their place.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state

        Detroit has received $88B in subsidies and loans since 2008. That’s why we have so many cheap EV options?

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Heavily subsidized by misery, as well.

          Detroit pays union wages and has to respect worker rights (at the top end of the supply chain). The “communist “ state seems to escape these limited obligations in big parts of their supply chains.

          • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            41 minutes ago

            Workers in Detroit might get paid union wages, but many auto factories have relocated to the South where they can underpay and abuse workers much more easily. I just did some quick googling and it seems like being a factory worker in China isn’t bad compared to in the US. They work in highly automated, clean, air-conditioned spaces like would be found here. Dirty conditions and manual labor are no longer compatible with today’s automotive quality requirements. Low level workers make modest wages, but they employ a bunch of engineers and technicians just like here in the US, and they have subsidized cafeterias and some provide housing or stipends for housing. You might criticize the expectation of working significant overtime, but I’ve worked in factories which had mandatory overtime in the US, so that sort of structural coercion isn’t unique to China. Compared to a “right to work” state, Chinese workers have stronger protections from being laid off or fired. The main downside seems to be lax enforcement of safety standards. If the government doesn’t notice something unsafe on its own, there isn’t a Chinese version of dropping a hint to OSHA.

            Now further upstream in the supply chain? No thanks. That’s where you’ll find abysmal working conditions. Just remember there are good reasons our government wants us to believe everything sucks for workers in China.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        And yet even at 2-3x the price, the Chinese EVs provide a better value than the handful of the American options they would compete against.

        This SUV would be competing with the likes of a high end EV option like Lucid or Tesla. The Lucid Gravity starts a around $70k, and the Tesla Model X (now discontinued) was around $92k.

        The Xiaomi SU7 (the car the Ford CEO has driven since 2024, despite being banned in the US) starts at $32k and clearly is targeted to compete the Porsche Taycan at $112k.

        The vehicle in this article has heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats, and over 1,000 miles of range. Functions western companies consider “luxury” are basically just standard in the Chinese market like heated and ventilated seats. They don’t even bother to advertise things like that because it’s a minimum expectation. There are zero western options that come close to something like that. The options available in the US suck, even taking industry subsidies into account.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats,

          Never have I once thought I needed any of that bullshit.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            And yet there it is, along with basically every other “luxury” feature western companies save for high end models… all for the price of a base model SUV here.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I see you forget about the first 3 models that Tesla made that were $70k or higher when they were discontinued, and all launched at $90k+

            • boonhet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              They were only high-end EVs because the EV market was dogshit then. They’ve never competed with high-end cars in general.

              Unfortunately it’s a race to the bottom and high-end cars are doing the same Tesla bullshit of a minimalist interior with a huge display instead of physical buttons with heft like they used to.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Both statements can be true at the same time. But the scale of one is many times larger.

          China’s MO from rare earths and magnets to cars to silicon follows the same plan. Take IP, Subsidize the industry, Research, once you have a monopoly use it to squeeze adversaries.

          I will say at least China is willing to kill off underperforming companies.

          The US needs to let a lot of legacy companies that aren’t performing die off. It also needs to break up oligopolies in many industries. Why compete when you can buy up the future competitors and set prices with a handful of competitors. The financialization of our economy is choking us.

          • randompasta@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 day ago

            Wrong. US manufacturers have effectively been shut out of China. But not before they made investments that China basically stole.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              effectively been shut out of China.

              Because Chinese won’t buy massive thirsty trucks. Wtf…Tesla was in China before they even started making EVs.

              • boonhet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                There’s a lot of protectionism going on in China, most western manufacturers aren’t allowed to sell their own cars without a Chinese company owning the majority of the partnership. Most countries don’t really have rules like that, China is kinda unique.

                The Chinese actually LOVE big cars. Every other European manufacturer makes long wheelbase versions of their midrange sedans for China exclusively. Space in the back is a status symbol more than comfort up front apparently. And there are a ton of big Chinese crossovers out now. I won’t call them SUVs because they’re not really off road capable, much like most western “SUVs” aren’t these days.

              • randompasta@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Depends on what you mean by American. Most assume you are referring to Ford or GM. But Tesla and Rivian are US made. Many are built in the States by non US companies. BMW, Volvo, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia.

                • ms.lane@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 minutes ago

                  Tesla is a toxic brand due to Elon.

                  I love the idea of Rivian but they don’t want to sell in Australia and the R1/R2 have too steep/bulldozer blade of a front to sell in EU (no pedestrian rollup protection)

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                I worked in the government for a bit, national park service if it matters, we were only allowed to use US made vehicles.

                Constant recalls, constant breakdowns, overall unreliable. These were all vehicles that were less than 5 years okd

                I have a 2007 toyota today that refuses to die and has barely needed any work. I’ll probably have it at least another 3 to 5 years at this rate.

                American cars are shit

                • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Worked at an oil refinery in the US. All the company cars were Ford. They all had various issues such as lights not working, the reverse beeper not working, constant engine light. We would get a loaner ford to replace our fleet ford and the loaner would fucking die. It would be comical if it wasn’t my safety being jeopardized.

                • cabbage@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  American capitalism has rendered companies incapable of producing anything that’s not crap at a scale because they need to maximise profit at all costs, while quality doesn’t mean shit. Every company is Boeing.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      So you think the entire world’s auto manufacturers outside of China are incompetent and inefficient? People always act like the only vehicles sold in the US are domestic brands when they don’t even make up a majority here.

      • doben@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Well, in Germany VW (the second largest automobile manufacturer in the world) now is laying off a significant portion of their employees, closing factories and even selling them off to US/Israeli weapons manufacturers. Their head also already signaled VW is being open to switch to weapons manufacturing. Pretty sure other German brands are in similar peril.

        Traditional manufacturers are dead.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          They chose to actively ignore EV technology. Despite 80-100 years of manufacturing , they got overtaken by China in just 15 years.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You mean Volks “we don’t even make an effort for our cars to obbey emission rules and instead we cheated” wagen is having trouble staying afloat?!

          I wonder how such a high quality company which was not at all doing funny business and using political connections is having trouble competing with those who just offer better products at lower prices …

          • boonhet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Volkswagen has made a ton of dumb mistakes, but among the worst are paying union wages and not getting super cheap lithium batteries from being located in a country that has a well integrated supply chain.

            We don’t want to mine or refine lithium as much in the EU because “boohoo muh environment” but really, if we want to compete with China we can’t let the environment be a deciding factor. Mine and refine all the resources we need instead of buying them from China and letting them dictate the prices. China doesn’t give a fuck about small issues standing in its way and neither should we.

            • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              33 minutes ago

              “We can’t let the environment be a deciding factor” is a preposterous take. There’s practically nothing more important that preserving the environment. Even the Chinese are looking beyond their borders for raw materials these days. If it costs more to extract raw materials in a way that doesn’t fuck up the environment, then subsidize it and pay for it. We can fund the subsidies with a carbon tax.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Corrupted by the oil industry and colluding together would be a better term. Someone please stop China, they are destroying the “EVs are luxury vehicles only” gimmick.

      • twisted@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well I wouldn’t say they’re all incompetent but look at how glacial all the “traditional” car companies have become. These guys are innovating at a speed never seen before while your traditional car manufacturers are stumbling over themselves trying to keep up.

        On the german side, just take a look at BMW and how long it took for them to come up with a competent electric platform. They just got their first car on a good platform (the new X3). Mercedes still doesn’t have a good EV, and neither does Audi. Their etron is outdated.

        Moving to the Japanese brands. I know Toyota isn’t focused on EVs at all and their hybrid is top notch so they’re one of the better ones out there. But no one else is even close. Not in terms of value for money. Not in terms of tech.

        The only ones that get close are Tesla because, like the Chinese, they’re running their car companies like tech companies and not car companies.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          What innovations are lacking specifically? I dont know of any features unique to Chinese brands. It seems more like you think every company should only be selling EVs for dirt cheap prices, but that isn’t realistic becausw those aren’t real prices and EVs aren’t yet practical for everyone which is why they make up such a small percentage of sales here still (though this number climbs with each quarter).

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Sorry, what’s the problem?

        If you can’t reach that resource, it’s your DNS provider being a limp-wristed dick. Change providers.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I always love seeing the headlines that say “west should fear when other countries beat them at their own game”. It’s the same stupid rhetoric that Trump keeps barking about AI and how “we have to beat China”.

    Mate, you all fucking caused everything to happen. Where do you see anything that says “Made in USA” anymore? Not that that would mean much today anyway given the shit quality the US has, but seriously.

    They’re just making up hysteria based on nothing. Nobody wants to fucking go to an office 5 days a week just to do remote meetings. Nobody wants to be dependent on cars for getting around.

    Nobody wants all this forced AI shit in our everyday lives. Just get over it. The endless conquest of world domination held by a handful of influencers is over. The world must change and to start, it must end all of this greedy ass capitalism which only seeks to cause misfortune for the rest of us.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Ross Perot warned everyone. They laughed at his ears.

      Yes there were warnings before but his was probably the last chance we had.

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, I fear those SUVs but not because that one is cheap, for an SUV but because oversized SUVs kill people (at a much higher rate than regular cars, even those with comparable loading volume).

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      My guess is that these Chinese manufacturers will kill the old automakers that are in rapid decline after decades of low quality products at high prices.

      I don’t know if the Chinese brands have good quality but they’re priced lower than the expensive low quality trash that’s already on the market from all the other automakers.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        sell cheap to kill competition around the world. leverage new global monopoly for fun and profits later.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          This. I’m all for competition and innovation, but this is subsidized by the Chinese government to exploit a lack of manufacturing in other countries.

          If you’ve heard about how food or clothing donations harm local farmers and weavers, same principle. We should be encouraging domestic production around the world, not allowing one country to undercut everyone else.

          • pdxfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 day ago

            China has been playing the long game for 30+ years. When you have actual history and strategy(and unlimited exploitable labor( you’d be amazed what you can accomplish.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Let me repeat it: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            And because it doesn’t ever seem to sink in: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Newsflash: Sinophobia is not an economic strategy.

            Edit: "“All for competition and innovation” The United States barred China from buying the latest NVIDIA chips to keep it out of AI. Typical American racist scapegoating.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              This thread is so fucking ignorant and choking on MAGA propaganda. Look this up idiots: the US of A has subsidized Detroit far more than China in the auto industry and BYD was heavily invested by US investors like Warren Buffet.

              Warren Buffet bought 10% of BYD because US options were all losers. From 2008 to 2022 he made $8.75B.

              • boonhet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                The USA has yet to kill the UAW which they must do to be competitive. It’s not an end-all be-all solution (wages are only like 30% of the cost of a car), but a good start. It also needs an entirely local battery supply chain, buying from China isn’t an option. And they need to pay for every EV that is manufactured, no matter where it’s sold to.

                But the US won’t take it seriously so they’ll never compete for real. Maybe they’ll kill UAW but only to increase shareholder value, not to compete for real.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They use this same tactic over and over and I find it surprising that more people don’t immediately recognize what they’re doing.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I guess it’s just more enticing than “maximise profits for the few even if it means the planet dying”. All western auto makers can get squeezed for all I care. I’d buy their products, but they spent a decade sabotaging it and making sure it keeps spewing poison.

            I have no pity for toxic companies that fought tooth and nail against EV development. The tactic works because it’s taking advantage of a broken system.

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t worry, I’m sure there’s another bailout and another cash for clunkers with a side of tariffs getting cooked up by some lobbyist to get passed by some paid off politicians. They are already trying to/already have pass(ed) a complete ban on Chinese autos. Knock knock, they are already on both borders.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        The United States greatly prefers that corporations be in charge of the government to governments being in charge of corporations.

          • doben@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            That‘s a reach, if I ever saw one. China lifted more than 800 million people out of poverty, and in fact eradicated poverty at all. Last I heard, their standard of living just closely missed being in the high income countries category. Their trajectory is in complete contrast to the declining Western empire.

            China is better at capitalism, because it‘s their only play to stay sovereign and overcome this predatory system completely. They have to prove to the capitalist world, that their system and long term development is superior and it‘s only beneficial for the world to follow their transition towards socialism to enable prosperity for all humankind, not just the global north. Not gonna happen under capitalism, especially not under the US or the EU.

            Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Nah. It’s just another rug pull in preparation. Undercut prices until the competition breaks, then fuck things up with your monopoly. We’re in the undercutting prices phase, but the Chinese will want to have their fair share of interest on the subsidies they use to do that right now. It’s the same old fucking capitalism again and nothing is saved from it.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Everyone said this would happen when Japanese cars started being sold in the US. It never happened.

        Detroit isn’t even trying to compete.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah. Companies running on state subsidies competing with others who are not is not capitalism “working”, it’s just another rug pull leaving us all fucked.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I guess in this fantasy scenario of yours, the United States is the one that doesn’t subsidize the auto industry? lol

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I love how criticizing the Chinese car industry leads people to asssume I love the American one.

            The US hasn’t produced a decent car since the 60s. I don’t even factor them into the calculation.

              • cabbage@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Not to the same degree or in the same way. In the US the name of the game is to have companies run themselves into the ground to line the pockets of CEOs and investors, and then the state bailing them out every time because of jobs and national pride.

                I’m sure there are other systems in place as well, but frankly I don’t care. Teslas are pretty much the only American cars you’ll see in Europe, and they’ve been subsidized by European countries to promote the electronic transition.

                In short, I don’t think about American cars at all.