• twisted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’ll be banned faster than you can memorize the spelling of Xiaomi. At least in the US, where we make sure the old inefficient companies stay afloat despite their incompetence.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The thing is, if the American government wants to be protectionist against Chinese cars, IMHO they need to pass legally binding legislation to force US car manufacturers to meet or exceed what the Chinese cars are offering and then directly subsidize the cost of those vehicles to the consumer, freely, with no stipulations. The punishment for failure to meet and exceed those expectations should be bankruptcy through immediate removal of the protectionist mechanisms.

      • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They tried when Japanese cars became popular for being efficient, the US car companies preferred to pretty much abandon the rest of the world and keep the government money.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The US is too busy licking other corps boots. They do not have enough funds to do it for everyone.

        They’d probably need to tax the rich a significant amount of money to do that.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they’re so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition out of the market before charging basically whatever they want.

      I’ve seen Starbucks do the same thing to independent coffee shops.

      Edit: This is a post about real car companies like Nissan, Volvo, Mercedes, Renault, whatever. I don’t care about America. Nobody has for decades.

      • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        American car companies (and American built cars) get subsidies from the US, Canada, and Mexico as all three form a single manufacturing chain. They simply have had a different set of priorities that allowed newcomers to eat their lunch, like it happens to any complacent industry.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they’re so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition

        Used to be, to get them going, robotics, innovation and vertical integration is most of the reason now. An example, BYD have their own roro ships and have ordered another 10,

        https://www.whichcar.com.au/news/byd-orders-10-more-car-carriers-export-push-accelerates

        and the new ships will be built in China

        they make their own batteries, electric motors etc and have massive robotic assembly plants.

        To suggest the reason why is because it’s not a level playing field is ludicrous, the US spends many billions subsidizing car manufacturers on top of the billions us consumers spend in subsidizing them. directly.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state

        Detroit has received $88B in subsidies and loans since 2008. That’s why we have so many cheap EV options?

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Heavily subsidized by misery, as well.

          Detroit pays union wages and has to respect worker rights (at the top end of the supply chain). The “communist “ state seems to escape these limited obligations in big parts of their supply chains.

          • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Workers in Detroit might get paid union wages, but many auto factories have relocated to the South where they can underpay and abuse workers much more easily. I just did some quick googling and it seems like being a factory worker in China isn’t bad compared to in the US. They work in highly automated, clean, air-conditioned spaces like would be found here. Dirty conditions and manual labor are no longer compatible with today’s automotive quality requirements. Low level workers make modest wages, but they employ a bunch of engineers and technicians just like here in the US, and they have subsidized cafeterias and some provide housing or stipends for housing. You might criticize the expectation of working significant overtime, but I’ve worked in factories which had mandatory overtime in the US, so that sort of structural coercion isn’t unique to China. Compared to a “right to work” state, Chinese workers have stronger protections from being laid off or fired. The main downside seems to be lax enforcement of safety standards. If the government doesn’t notice something unsafe on its own, there isn’t a Chinese version of dropping a hint to OSHA.

            Now further upstream in the supply chain? No thanks. That’s where you’ll find abysmal working conditions. Just remember there are good reasons our government wants us to believe everything sucks for workers in China.

            • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Oh yes, and even plum union jobs for floor workers in Windsor or Brampton can be kind of shit too, especially in some of the parts factories.

              I expect that from hypercapitalist oligarch-run societies. I don’t expect it from vanguard countries. It’s a betrayal.

      • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Frankly, american cars could use a knockdown. Tesla was our only real hope, and we would have glided into a strong Tesla and EV empire if conservative dems didn’t bail out GM, Chrysler, and Ford. Additionally, Tesla wouldn’t have been in a position to get bought by a dumb nazi.

        I’d say, let their stuff in. Lets get some good cheap and subsidizes vehicles from China on the condition that they don’t raise car prices by more than 2% a year.

        American companies will more than likely fall on their face and hopefully die. Making room for a new american car company to take their place.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        And yet even at 2-3x the price, the Chinese EVs provide a better value than the handful of the American options they would compete against.

        This SUV would be competing with the likes of a high end EV option like Lucid or Tesla. The Lucid Gravity starts a around $70k, and the Tesla Model X (now discontinued) was around $92k.

        The Xiaomi SU7 (the car the Ford CEO has driven since 2024, despite being banned in the US) starts at $32k and clearly is targeted to compete the Porsche Taycan at $112k.

        The vehicle in this article has heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats, and over 1,000 miles of range. Functions western companies consider “luxury” are basically just standard in the Chinese market like heated and ventilated seats. They don’t even bother to advertise things like that because it’s a minimum expectation. There are zero western options that come close to something like that. The options available in the US suck, even taking industry subsidies into account.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats,

          Never have I once thought I needed any of that bullshit.

          • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            53 minutes ago

            it seems to want it to be like a compact RV rather than a SUV

            because all of those does sound like something you want in an RV

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 hours ago

            And yet there it is, along with basically every other “luxury” feature western companies save for high end models… all for the price of a base model SUV here.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I see you forget about the first 3 models that Tesla made that were $70k or higher when they were discontinued, and all launched at $90k+

            • boonhet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 hours ago

              They were only high-end EVs because the EV market was dogshit then. They’ve never competed with high-end cars in general.

              Unfortunately it’s a race to the bottom and high-end cars are doing the same Tesla bullshit of a minimalist interior with a huge display instead of physical buttons with heft like they used to.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Both statements can be true at the same time. But the scale of one is many times larger.

          China’s MO from rare earths and magnets to cars to silicon follows the same plan. Take IP, Subsidize the industry, Research, once you have a monopoly use it to squeeze adversaries.

          I will say at least China is willing to kill off underperforming companies.

          The US needs to let a lot of legacy companies that aren’t performing die off. It also needs to break up oligopolies in many industries. Why compete when you can buy up the future competitors and set prices with a handful of competitors. The financialization of our economy is choking us.

          • randompasta@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            1 day ago

            Wrong. US manufacturers have effectively been shut out of China. But not before they made investments that China basically stole.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              effectively been shut out of China.

              Because Chinese won’t buy massive thirsty trucks. Wtf…Tesla was in China before they even started making EVs.

              • boonhet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                There’s a lot of protectionism going on in China, most western manufacturers aren’t allowed to sell their own cars without a Chinese company owning the majority of the partnership. Most countries don’t really have rules like that, China is kinda unique.

                The Chinese actually LOVE big cars. Every other European manufacturer makes long wheelbase versions of their midrange sedans for China exclusively. Space in the back is a status symbol more than comfort up front apparently. And there are a ton of big Chinese crossovers out now. I won’t call them SUVs because they’re not really off road capable, much like most western “SUVs” aren’t these days.

              • randompasta@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Depends on what you mean by American. Most assume you are referring to Ford or GM. But Tesla and Rivian are US made. Many are built in the States by non US companies. BMW, Volvo, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia.

                • ms.lane@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Tesla is a toxic brand due to Elon.

                  I love the idea of Rivian but they don’t want to sell in Australia and the R1/R2 have too steep/bulldozer blade of a front to sell in EU (no pedestrian rollup protection)

                • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Tesla and Rivian are US made

                  Chinese batteries and many parts from Canada and Mexico.

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                I worked in the government for a bit, national park service if it matters, we were only allowed to use US made vehicles.

                Constant recalls, constant breakdowns, overall unreliable. These were all vehicles that were less than 5 years okd

                I have a 2007 toyota today that refuses to die and has barely needed any work. I’ll probably have it at least another 3 to 5 years at this rate.

                American cars are shit

                • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Worked at an oil refinery in the US. All the company cars were Ford. They all had various issues such as lights not working, the reverse beeper not working, constant engine light. We would get a loaner ford to replace our fleet ford and the loaner would fucking die. It would be comical if it wasn’t my safety being jeopardized.

                  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    Where car is made is irrelevant. How it is designed and engineered matters. Toyotas made in North America outlast anything designed in Detroit.

                  • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    Except for the design and almost all the parts. Probably was assembled here

                • cabbage@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  American capitalism has rendered companies incapable of producing anything that’s not crap at a scale because they need to maximise profit at all costs, while quality doesn’t mean shit. Every company is Boeing.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      So you think the entire world’s auto manufacturers outside of China are incompetent and inefficient? People always act like the only vehicles sold in the US are domestic brands when they don’t even make up a majority here.

      • doben@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Well, in Germany VW (the second largest automobile manufacturer in the world) now is laying off a significant portion of their employees, closing factories and even selling them off to US/Israeli weapons manufacturers. Their head also already signaled VW is being open to switch to weapons manufacturing. Pretty sure other German brands are in similar peril.

        Traditional manufacturers are dead.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You mean Volks “we don’t even make an effort for our cars to obbey emission rules and instead we cheated” wagen is having trouble staying afloat?!

          I wonder how such a high quality company which was not at all doing funny business and using political connections is having trouble competing with those who just offer better products at lower prices …

          • boonhet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Volkswagen has made a ton of dumb mistakes, but among the worst are paying union wages and not getting super cheap lithium batteries from being located in a country that has a well integrated supply chain.

            We don’t want to mine or refine lithium as much in the EU because “boohoo muh environment” but really, if we want to compete with China we can’t let the environment be a deciding factor. Mine and refine all the resources we need instead of buying them from China and letting them dictate the prices. China doesn’t give a fuck about small issues standing in its way and neither should we.

            • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              “We can’t let the environment be a deciding factor” is a preposterous take. There’s practically nothing more important that preserving the environment. Even the Chinese are looking beyond their borders for raw materials these days. If it costs more to extract raw materials in a way that doesn’t fuck up the environment, then subsidize it and pay for it. We can fund the subsidies with a carbon tax.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They chose to actively ignore EV technology. Despite 80-100 years of manufacturing , they got overtaken by China in just 15 years.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Corrupted by the oil industry and colluding together would be a better term. Someone please stop China, they are destroying the “EVs are luxury vehicles only” gimmick.

      • twisted@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well I wouldn’t say they’re all incompetent but look at how glacial all the “traditional” car companies have become. These guys are innovating at a speed never seen before while your traditional car manufacturers are stumbling over themselves trying to keep up.

        On the german side, just take a look at BMW and how long it took for them to come up with a competent electric platform. They just got their first car on a good platform (the new X3). Mercedes still doesn’t have a good EV, and neither does Audi. Their etron is outdated.

        Moving to the Japanese brands. I know Toyota isn’t focused on EVs at all and their hybrid is top notch so they’re one of the better ones out there. But no one else is even close. Not in terms of value for money. Not in terms of tech.

        The only ones that get close are Tesla because, like the Chinese, they’re running their car companies like tech companies and not car companies.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          What innovations are lacking specifically? I dont know of any features unique to Chinese brands. It seems more like you think every company should only be selling EVs for dirt cheap prices, but that isn’t realistic becausw those aren’t real prices and EVs aren’t yet practical for everyone which is why they make up such a small percentage of sales here still (though this number climbs with each quarter).