cannedtuna@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agoAI companies right now:lemmy.worldimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up1611arrow-down13
arrow-up1608arrow-down1imageAI companies right now:lemmy.worldcannedtuna@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareCort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·14 days agoMalice needs to be provable. Anything that goes wrong with AI will just be an oopsie-woopsie until proven otherwise. And good luck proving it because AI was designed to be inscrutable.
minus-squareAxolotl@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·13 days agoIn a lot of places (idk abour USA) you can be sent to prison even if you didn’t do it on purpose/didn’t mean any harm/etc., etc.
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·13 days agoYou don’t need to prove malice in a lot of criminal cases. I’m not getting off Scott free with manslaughter cause I didn’t mean to kill someone.
minus-squareRustyEarthfire@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoFor manslaughter you would need to show it was either in commission of another crime or via negligence.
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 days agoMy dude, absolutely not!
Malice needs to be provable. Anything that goes wrong with AI will just be an oopsie-woopsie until proven otherwise. And good luck proving it because AI was designed to be inscrutable.
In a lot of places (idk abour USA) you can be sent to prison even if you didn’t do it on purpose/didn’t mean any harm/etc., etc.
You don’t need to prove malice in a lot of criminal cases. I’m not getting off Scott free with manslaughter cause I didn’t mean to kill someone.
For manslaughter you would need to show it was either in commission of another crime or via negligence.
My dude, absolutely not!