• panda@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Every so often we have issues with the local tram service because someone has driven up the line of a section where there is no shared space with road traffic and got stuck, despite it being very obvious from the signage, road markings and eventually a lack of suitable ground to drive on that you shouldn’t be driving there.

    Agreed that a bollard would definitely help here but it worries me to the state of mind of some of the drivers on our roads. Surely it was obvious that an already narrow path was narrowing further and to stop before wedging your large car between a bench and a fence?!

  • 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This community would probably have no content if massive idiots didn’t exist

  • livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Mumbles councillor Will Thomas said it happened on Friday night and had happened twice before

    Bollard time at entrances, I guess (or more benches)

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I don’t understand people who lose all sense of reason and logic when they use satnav.

    Satnav is first and foremost an aid, it doesn’t replace your responsibility as a driver to actually look and figure out what is resonable when driving.

    If I am confused while driving, with or without a satnav, I ignore it and find a parking spot so I can calmly check out what is going on with the route.

    I’d rather take the wrong turn safely and have to drive back a bit than listen to bad advice and drive down a bad road.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      SatNav is a voice of authority telling you what to do.

      The amount of people that turn off their brain and completely cave to a voice of authority, regardless of the consequences, is disturbingly high… as the Milgram Experiment shows.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        As soon as I got my car, I turned off the voice in google maps, I like having the directions, but I hate having a voice telling me what to do

    • Jackusflackus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately this extremely correct line of thinking and practice is only performed by the super vast minority of drivers. People are absolutely stupid anymore.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yes, I know, I know.

        I even take it further, if I make a misstake and end up in bad spot, but everything turned out ok in the end, say if I blow a stop sign or something similar, it has happened, though it is rare.

        Then I will do either of two things:

        1. If it is remotely practical, I will drive back and drive the exact scenario again, while paying extra attention to why I made the misstake and what I need to work on, I will do this multiple times to make sure I get it right.
        2. If going back ins not an option, I will make a mental note of checking out the location in Google Street View and look at the signs, marking and general situation while recalling the situation, to try and investigate what went wrong.

        I do my best to try and learn from my own misstakes.

    • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Looking at the pictures in the article, I think the driver already had that covered.

    • Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just continue on the path, straight over the top, most vehicles like that don’t handle human weight on plastic and paper thin aluminum very well, bonus points if the music you’re listening to requires a stomping bass beat about the same time you cross the front and back glass…

  • TBi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m supposed they haven’t added a little pole in the middle of the entrance. That would deter most people. Even idiotic ones who think this perfectly paved narrow path is a road.

  • Starfighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    “It was about half a mile down the path,” he said, adding: “The last time it was about 300 or 400 metres.”

    Gotta love a good mix of units. Without looking this up I have no idea which distance is greater.

      • wheezy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        For those confused, a meter is slightly less than a yard. Though because that system of measurement is ridiculously dumb to still use today. A mile isn’t 1000 yards. It’s 1760 yards.

        Edit: Yes, I reversed that. A meter is slightly more than a yard.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          A mile is 1000 paces (one left, one right) of a nominal Roman soldier carrying what was full kit in those days. Mille = 1000. Its value has drifted over the centuries and was different in England and France, and not even particularly well standardized in England until relatively recently.

          • wheezy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            For sure. I had another comment basically explaining it has always been a term of colloquial meaning to explain distance. It’s mostly only Americans that use it for real distance measurements. And even then a lot Americans explain distance in terms of “time it takes to drive”.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      32 minutes ago

      I think “a mile” is a holdover from the use of that system of measurement previously. It’s a colloquial means of describing distance. It’s not meant to be a literal measurement. It just means a distance that is long enough to be of significance. A physical understanding of it, not a measuring tape. When I hear someone in the US say “about half a mile” when talking about a distance I don’t think they are being literal.

      Also, you should probably know that 300 to 400 meters is less (obviously so) than 0.5 miles. A meter is just a few inches shorter longer than a yard. For short distances and “about” language like this you can just use them interchangeably.

      Someone using different units “miles” and “yards” in the US would not have all confused Americans. Even though those units are different and not easily comparable by a mathematical factor. 1760 yards in a mile. Really meaningful /s

      This is just common colloquial means of speaking and “a mile” is just a holdover from historical use of the term. “A kilometer” just doesn’t roll of the tongue as nicely.

      Edit: I said shorter instead of longer. Sorry internet.

      • HorseChandelier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        A meter is just a few inches shorter than a yard

        True candidate for “confidently wrong”.

        It is, in fact, the other way around. A meter is 3’ 3"(ish) - close enough to 3" bigger that it makes no difference to John Doe. It does make a difference when being accurate for reasons of course.

        If you want to comfirm it, without resorting to fundamental definitions (uk imperial), 1000m is 5 furlongs to within a couple of inches. There are 220 yards in a furlong so 1100 yards in 5 furlongs, therefore yards are shorter than meters.

        Why use furlongs? Because a handy short conversion is 1km= 5/8 of a mile and a furlong is exactly 1/8 of a mile.

        • wheezy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Yes. My comment was entirely about the unit difference and not at all about the colloquial use of units when estimating distance visually. /s

          The person didn’t measure the distance dude. They used a range from 300-400 meters. This isn’t about being accurate. It’s about giving someone a sense of scale. 300-400 yards gives that same sense of scale. If it was accurate the estimate wouldn’t have a 100m range.

          That was the entire point of my comment. That someone that doesn’t have the sense of scale of what a “meter” is can easily understand that scale by knowing “a yard is few inches less than a meter”

          Like, you can’t “confidently incorrect” my comment when you missed the entire point of it.

          A yard is a fundamental unit of measure that people, who don’t have a sense of scale for meters, can understand. And vice versa.

          No one has a colloquial understanding of the distance of a furlong. Are you saying they do?

          • HorseChandelier@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Dude, you literally said a meter is a few inches shorter than a yard. That is completely incorrect in any context, wether measuring accurately or illustrating orders of distance.

            I mean you could have said “oops my bad i meant a meter is a bit longer than a yard” and i could have said “my dude, you are mistaken about the size of a meter” but its t’internet i guess.

            Btw many people have jobs that depend on them knowing how long a furlong is… Ask any racing horse trainer or jockey.

            • wheezy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You could have also said “I think you reversed that. It’s a few inches longer than a yard” instead of being a dickhead. Especially when the point of the comment is about absolute difference, where which is larger does not factor.

              Yes, I meant to say “a meter is a few inches more than a yard”

              See how I didn’t even realize that I reversed it because you were so bad at communicating it?

              See how it being more or less didn’t actually matter to the point I was making in my original comment? Whether it was a few inches more or less doesn’t actually matter to the point of the comment. The point is that they are close enough to give an approximate equivalent when speaking about visually approximating a distance?

              Are you the person that screams at the barista for giving you a Large Americano and a Small Latte when you asked for a Small Americano and a Large latte? Do you tell “oh my God you made my drink wrong!” Or do you calmly say “hi, I think you reversed the size of the drinks. My friend wanted a large latte.”