small rant incoming

I work for a company that it’s mostly hardware focused, but we do ship some software for the final consumer including drivers and programs, to make use of said hardware.

While I am not in the software department, I held some SWE positions in previous companies for over a decade, our software isn’t very complex and I do know most of it pretty well.

Our employee just announced a new AI-only development cycle, they want all code submissions and reviews to be exclusively done by claude, effectively ending ownership of the code being shipped to customers. This is absolute madness.

Today, I received an email scheduling a workshop on how to integrate claude into vscode and how to work with the new gitflow, namely removing our authorship from commits and having al code reviews done by a LLM now.

I am just baffled at the decision.

edit: wow I’m a bit overwhelmed by the response, I did read all of you. Thanks!

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    For software dev, the only one product we have found to be useful is Claude, BUT it really depends on the model. Haiku is a joke. Sonnet is not bad, if not bad is ~50% accuracy.

    Lets assume you have to cross a desert by foot. You can have either a human guide or a map, which is cheaper. The guide can reliably tell you points where you will find water that you need in order to survive. The map has much more information but it will be bullshit half of the time.

    Which would you chose?

    What would a company chose?

    Why?