• Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Nice! Where was the turnout during the nationals?

    I’m tired of these news, of we follow what’s shared here we would have destroyed the Republicans, and they are useless and everybody hates them…

    But here we are.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      OTOH I’d want to know which dema sat it out as a virtue signalling exercise, and now act all indignant blended into the crowd now the rest are up in arms (figuratively, of course). It’s like oh yeah, back then it wasn’t such a big deal to take control of your govt, blame the system blah blah blah.

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Getting involved in actual politics at a local level is better long run than voting in big elections.

        The latter is damage control. The former long run positive change.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Avoiding constituents is peak cowardice—if you can’t face voters, you shouldn’t hold office.

    🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I guess I’m an ignorant fuck because I thought that these town halls were required by law in some way. It’s insane they can just be like “nah, not gonna show up”. It should be an instant impeachment by law.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        yeah the law should just automatically depose cowards who don’t face their constituents.

        unfortunately we sort of have a “who watches the watchers” situation here. expecting lawmakers to make laws to police themselves is ridiculous. idk what can be done for that honestly. the French had some ideas back in the day though.

        • musubibreakfast@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          The American Revolution inspired the French Revolution, hopefully the French Revolution can inspire an American Revolution.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Elected dems do hold town halls like this article talks about. If you are referring to dems not in office, they’re starting to do stuff like that. For instance:

      Rep. Tom Kean Jr. (R) refuses to hold a town hall in NJ-07. So next Thursday March 13 in Summit, NJ former Rep. Tom Malinowski will hold a town hall meeting to discuss the current moment and what citizens can do to protect democracy. RSVP link here (or use the QR code): https://forms.gle/RcSVhWpsrLCfT9w67

      https://bsky.app/profile/njindivisible.bsky.social/post/3ljww6godzc23

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Bold of you to assume we’ll be allowed to have mid-terms

      Edit: that’s just me being snarky. Keep fighting the good fight. Vote in every fucking election that you can, at every level you can - federal, state, and local (and, if you’re an investor, shareholder - that, I think, is an under emphasized vector here). Be an activist in every way you can, through every path available to you.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Elections are run at the state level including for federal offices. There have already been >48 state and local elections this year since January alone. Elections are way more than just the midterms and they are still happening. See https://ballotpedia.org/Elections_calendar

        Normalizing the idea that elections wouldn’t happen is just playing directly into Trump and Musk’s hands

        They want us to be so cynical we stop fighting back. They want us not to vote. They want us to not protest. They want us to not boycott. They want us too tired to fight

        Don’t give in, we can still win these fights

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Oh, I’m not giving in. I was just being snarky. All I’m trying to do with comments like that is to get more people to take the situation more seriously. I know we’re not cooked yet, but the hot plate is getting pretty fucking toasty.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Comments like that unfortunately do the opposite - they make people defeatest which makes people stop paying attention to the situation at all

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Fair point.

              I admit I’ve been feeling pretty fucking bleak about things lately. I also admit I sometimes use this space as a pressure-release valve for myself. It’s fair and correct to point out that the vibe I’m introducing is counterproductive. I shall try to do better. Cheers, friend.

              • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Wait, wait you can have productive discussions like this on the internet? (Thank you for being receptive - we need more people like you)

                • Floppybutton@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  Same comment to both of you guys so you both see it. I can’t say it made me happy, but this thread did make me feel a little bit better. Thanks for being a decent human, even if just for these few comments.

                • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Honestly, I’ve had a lot more interactions like this on lemmy since I joined a couple years ago than I ever had on Reddit. It’s one of the reasons I actually kinda like this place.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, but Gaza! I think I’ll sit it out again to show them!

      /s cuz apparently even dems online don’t understand sarcasm

    • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We need people telling at them, and we need people politely approaching them with the same policies.

      A game of good constituent/bad constituent, if you will.

    • TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      People probably won’t need to yell at them if the Democrats actually are listening to and engaging with the voters.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If democrats think that auction paddles are gonna solve this, they still need to be yelled at.

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Democrats do not listen to or engage with voters. The last time we told them to listen. their response was ‘I’m speaking.’

      • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If they engaged with their voters, we wouldn’t have any democratic representatives over age of 65. Anything past that is just posturing and self enrichment

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            If they engaged with their voters, we wouldn’t have any democratic representatives over age of 65.

            Bernie Sanders is not a democrat.

                • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  Man you love telling others what they are saying, don’t you?

                  Your entire comment history is you editing the words of others. I wonder why that is……

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          What’s with the ageism? I want Democratic representatives of any age, as long as they have the right policies and they are of sound mind. People over the age of 65 will be just fine with me, thanks.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You gotta draw the line somewhere. Retirement age seems like as good a place as any.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Why do you have to draw the line somewhere?

              I feel like a broken record here, but the huge uptick in ageism I see in relation to politics seems like it’s not going to, ahem, age well given the amount of things I keep seeing about slowing down/reversing aging…

              I mean, yeah, it sounds kind of silly until it doesn’t. I remember reading about/thinking about things like AI (even if it’s not AGI - things like LLMs are here and disrupting the shit out of things). Same with self-driving cars. And yeah, neither of these things are perfect, but they are having an effect on society - people I know mostly got very smug and dismissive about these notions just 20 years ago. They are rather quiet about them now. I think the same thing is true about aging. Even if the breakthroughs are extremely mild and stay that way for decades, maybe even forever, suppose average healthspan is increased even 5 years. That will make (upper) age limits look very myopic and dated.

              • krashmo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                It’s not about how long you live so much as getting stuck in your ways. Old people don’t learn new things and adapt the way young people do. Humans solidify the way they do things in their 20s, make some fine tuning in their 30s/40s, and then pretty much stick to those habits for the rest of their life. With the way technology is progressing we can’t have stagnant people leading an evolving society.

                There are exceptions to every rule but that doesn’t mean statistics aren’t valuable information to base decisions on. Do you want people stuck in the past making laws about the future?

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                So you’d be fine with a child holding the role? After all why draw a line. Age relates to capability on both ends.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I bet the Democrats are using the momentum to send a stern message. And the press will proudly feature articles of how the Democrats SLAMMED the white house!! And the White house will barely notice, and go on doing what they are doing.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Great. Now the Democrats can have everything lined up to take over during the midterms and…change nothing.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Last time we had a filibuster proof majority was in 2009 for two different periods of two months each.

      Essentially Republicans have either been in power or had enough power to stop Democrats for the entire voting lives of most people on this sub.

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s crazy that there are people still using this line. I’m sorry but when was the last time the Republicans had a “filibuster proof majority”. They seem to be doing really well in getting their policies passed.

        The Democratic party is an absolute failure in providing the policies that they pretend to want. I’m so tired of hearing this “there is nothing we can do”.

        It’s like the Democrats are sitting here constantly complaining that “a dog can’t play basketball” while they get dunked on by a dog over and over.

        We are at this stage BECAUSE the Democrats are trying to “play by the rules” that the Republicans threw out the fucking window decades ago. We have DOGE and people are still using this “filibuster” excuse for a pathetic excuse for a resistance party. Stop defending their incompetence!

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Last time we had a filibuster proof majority was in 2009 for two different periods of two months each.

        Any time during which democrats possessed a simple majority, they could have done away with the filibuster forever. Stop making excuses.

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          We will. It will not matter. Congress will likely be powerless by that point. Or a large portion of the Democratic party will align with the fascist policies by then as their donors place more pressure on them. We know how much democrats love to “reach across the isle”.

          Keeping up the illusion of democracy is the one of the most important things for the bourgeoisie to maintain. They will go through the charades for sure.

          It’s more important that people see through the charades of our system. I’m hoping that starts happening more.

          I feel like everyone is waiting for a “moment” to get them off their couch. By the time that moment happens it’s already too late.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hopefully they’ll have something worth turning out for. Let’s see if you become hostile to the suggestion that democrats need to become better in order to appeal to voters.