It can be tech-related or not. So far we’ve had the .com bubble, Bitcoin bubble, NFT bubble and now AI (probably) bubble. What do you think the next bubble will be?

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah no doubt. It can be pitched as solving all the world’s problems immediately, and fear mongered as “breaking all security instantly”. There’s no defined end product yet, so the goalposts can move.

      Like AI, it can be a test of the debt market more than of tech

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        It can be marketed that way, but mathematically, a LOT of encryption that’s used is already “quantum proof”.

        https://signal.org/blog/spqr/

        Of course nothing is perfect, but we’re pretty confident that the existence of quantum computers won’t break the internet.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Oh yeah, to be clear, it’ll break incredibly old and weak encryption, which is already not that hard to break.

          I think quantum will have some cool specific use cases in science and math modeling, but will be over hyped like the AI bubble as a total game changer.

    • WormFood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      The UK govt announced £162m in cuts to research council funding last month, then this month they announced £2bn for a massive quantum computing project. I’m all for blue sky research but the field is basically a giant money pit. £2bn would have bought multiple general purpose supercomputers that could have been used for biology, materials science, astrophysics etc. The quantum computing research is inevitably going to yield a quantum processor with less than 1kb of memory that can only run for a few nanoseconds. The government is disproportionately funding this stuff because of the siren song promise that quantum computing will help them break encryption, but the field has taken so long to materialise anything useful that we now have quantum-resistant classical encryption algorithms. Also, plenty of physicists are now skeptical of the idea that quantum computers will be intrinsically faster than classical computers for most tasks.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Also, plenty of physicists are now skeptical of the idea that quantum computers will be intrinsically faster than classical computers for most tasks.

        Tbh, this isn’t really that new of an idea. Quantum computing requires temperatures less than 3 Kelvin. It doesn’t matter how efficient your processor is, getting anything down to that temperature requires a lot of cooling equipment, so much that it’s utterly impractical for general use.

        It’s kinda like analogue computing, aka comuting with analogue signals instead of digital. You’re able to solve problems extremely fast, on par with (if not superior to) quantum computing. The downside is that the circuits have to be custom designed for the use case, making it impractical for most tasks.

        • WormFood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          At the time people thought that you might build new supercomputers with an on-site cryostat (or something like that) housing a bunch of QPUs.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      They said next bubble, not one of the 4-5 current bubbles.

      Fyi, this is meant to be light hearted. I considered adding “/s”, but it doesn’t quite fit

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Plastics. That bubble is going to pop if this Iran thing doesn’t get fixed.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      We get plenty of plastic feedstock from shale, and it’s super cheap because it’s considered a by-product of extracting the natural gas. So cheap that it’s severely hampered the adoption of recycling plastics, even the easy stuff.

      If plastic feedstock goes up in price, then recycling starts becoming economically viable and limiting how high it can go, creating a soft price ceiling

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I predict (from my unlimited wisdom):

    Personal Avatars.

    Since the chat messaging apps must become interoperable now, people will create their virtual “self” across different platforms.

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I would say probably more likely to be a personal AI assistant, that handles all PC/cell phone interactions for you. Like Star Trek: “Computer, do my taxes!”

      Of course that relies heavily on AI becoming more reliable then it is now.

      No one wants an AI summery of their e-mails if it’s full of hallucinations, or their tax returns to get them into prison.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        personal AI assistant

        I think it needs a few more years before they are good enough to be used by the masses.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s a bunch of US companies hyping it, too. A free claiming they’ll be selling power as soon as 2028 (such as Helion in their deal with Microsoft)

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yes that’s the joke because saying decades means you’re not close and can’t really guess as to how far of you are.

          Usually, saying it’s 2 years out, means they have something workable but scaling to production is still in progress.

          We’ll have to see if this is just marketing hype or not.

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I could make a lot of money if I knew. I just don’t and neither does anyone else.