• kofe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Age isn’t inherently a bad thing in politics. We’re a representative democracy, and older adults deserve representation reflected as equally as any other eligible voter demographic imo (which could include felons and other disenfranchised populations where possible, but that’s a whole other convo).

    It’s disproportionately skewed due to lack of term limits, it’s often safer for parties to run an incumbent, and there’s benefits to having someone with the experience stay in, so idk. I don’t have a ton of solutions by any means, just want to push back on the ageism and add some nuance here. Bernie’s still out there doing a his job representing the demographic well

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Age isn’t inherently a bad thing in politics. We’re a representative democracy,

      I am not a workaholic. I want to retire from my profession some day, not continue working while in hospice care.

      I want to be represented by someone who understands and shares my values, which includes a desire to enjoying life after retirement.

      I want my representatives to value and promote the idea of recreation, hobbies, volunteer work, etc. Which means they will be retiring from professional work around 65, not 90.

      Being of retirement age is an inherently bad thing in professional politics.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Age is a problem cognitive decline is real and no one escapes it. These 70 and 80 year old people aren’t mentally competent.