The U.S. Army has used up much of its stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during its five-month war with Iran, according to three people familiar with the data, raising concerns about the military’s readiness for future conflicts.
The missiles are principally the Army’s surface-to-surface weapons, known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). The U.S. has used “virtually all” of these weapons, according to two of the sources.
The degree to which the military is running out of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles has not been previously reported.
The long-range munitions are an important part the military’s arsenal, allowing accurate strikes from a safe distance. U.S.-supplied ATACMS have played a key role in the war in Ukraine, allowing Ukrainian forces to attack targets inside Russia. The PrSM is a newer, more advanced generation that will replace the ATACMS, which have a shorter range.
One man’s shortage is another man’s bounty.
Because Hegseth is obsessed with setting records for numbers of bombs dropped, because he wouldn’t recognize strategic success if he saw it, which he hasn’t, because there hasn’t been any.
Why do I have a terrible sneaking suspicion, propaganda or not, that this will be used as an excuse.
Rumors are floating that Russia is toying with making a move on Poland, or perhaps a smaller NATO member. One theory is they’re just posturing to detract from the situation with Ukraine and appear strong. Despite this, Ukraine relies heavily on assistance from EU/NATO countries for supplies/money. Even mildly credible threats may force some of those countries to scale back some assistance and focus on internal efforts, which impacts Ukraine’s supply chain.
How does this tie in with the US? If a NATO country is attacked and goes Article 5…the US might try to use this as an excuse for lack of significant aid.
There is no need for an excuse. Article 5 dictates members must help. But it does not dictate how. And members have a fair bit of discretion when it comes to how they assist.
Trump is upset that NATO didn’t help with Iran. And will “help” NATO the same way NATO “helped” him. He’ll be open about that without shame.
Well since the orange turd doesn’t give a fuck about contracts, or the constitution in general, he’ll pull something out of his
assdiaper to avoid obligations
The source of those rumors . . . .is apparently the US.
Why would Russia attack Poland, to widen a war that is already a quagmire?
I suspect that the US under Trump not coming to help if a smaller NATO members was attacked by Russia is pretty much considered a realistic scenario in the military planing in Europe for such an event.
Europe’s sudden desire for greater military investment started with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine but really took of when Trump became POTUS and started his adversarial posture towards Europe (most notably on Greenland), cutting down on help to Ukraine and general militaristic dick-waving.
I think the plan is for Europe to face Russia in a united way and, if the US actually helps in that, that would be nice but not critical.
Judging by the situation in Ukraine if Russia faced a united Europe even without the US it would be crushed no matter how many millions of conscripts they threw at it in human waves.
IMHO the critical part here is a united Europe directly engaging Russia militarily (rather than merely helping with weapons) if Russia attacks an European nation, no matter how small or peripheral, not the participation of the US military.
When the stakes are high and the costs of it real and significant (even just economically, as we saw with the delays in stopping importing Russian fossil fuels when Russia invaded Ukraine) Europe has trouble becoming united in an expedient way.
Judging by the situation in Ukraine if Russia faced a united Europe even without the US it would be crushed
I think that’s not the correct lesson. Ukraine, and now Iran, have shown that like in WWI the defenders in 21st century wars have incredible advantages. And that you need to be able to produce drones in massive numbers.
Neither of those favors Europe attacking Russia. Who, you might want to ALSO remember, is a fucking nuclear power.
If you’re so eager to go fight Russia, go sign up in Ukraine. But it’s a very bad idea for Europe to do so.
Whoa!
How the hell did you leaped from a discussion about “could NATO without the US defend Europe from a Russian attack on it” to “Europe attacking Russia”???!
I don’t know which hole that Russia-Propaganda-favorite strawman was pulled out of, but it stinks and has nothing to do with the point that was being made, either by me or in my understanding by anybody before me.
All of a sudden it’s like the charge of the tankie brigade around here.
Yeah, I’m a Titoist, not a tankie. Chickenhawks like you apparently can’t conceive of any other reason to not support a war, though - that is, as long as you’re not fighting, right?
Russia isn’t attacking Europe. Europe IS pouring money into Ukraine, with the open purpose of bleeding Russia.
If you want to make sure Russia doesn’t attack Europe, it’s already there - nuclear weapons, which France has, and drone factories. You don’t need to create a massive military industrial complex. The only scenario that doesn’t support is Europe attacking Russia - which, from your nonsense about “crushing” Russia, seems to be what you want.
It’s been no secret that the orange turd has wanted to pull the US out of NATO. It’s also no secret that when he got back into the white house several European countries began to strengthen themselves and each other in the event that does happen.
NATO was a cold war alliance, so it’s been on shaky ground since 1993. And the fact that it dances to US interests, and the US is plain that their interests might override European ones, is just becoming more obvious because Trump is too stupid to lie well.
People forget now, but original support for Ukraine against Russia started under Obama (Euromaiden had lots of US support), and the wide open support under Biden.
Trump I, while more hesitant, also supported Ukraine, and has often been foolish enough to remove restrictions the Democrats had on them. Remember his first impeachment was due to putting conditions on the military aid he was sending to Ukraine (pre-invasion).
I can’t help but think that’s bait to start a big war to keep Trump in power.
The US is really run by a bunch of Eejits
its soley used for targets that cant fight back.
Mockheed Lartin is loving this.
I just read the prologue for The Enemy Within don’t spoil the rest of the story
Should have been used up against the Kremlin. It is a disaster that it still stands as is.
No they haven’t. This is propaganda 101. Do you REALLY think they’re advertising their actual supply and production capacity?
These types of lies were the backbone of the Russia strategy, let the Russians advance, deplete themselves while we ramp up our production, then they not only won’t be able to defend their gains but they’ll have to retreat.
All the while having provoked them so we can use Ukraine as a bulwark and voluntary cannon fodder. Wadn’t us, it’s them!
Don’t fall for it, these people are trained killers and do it for a living. They know what they’re doing and they’re running out of missiles like the US is running out of active shooters.
No I think this is true. Some “defense industry” people play magic at my LGS and they’ve been talking about this obliquely.
Your friends are complicit in war crimes.
Literally never said they were my friends. But thanks for assuming my life and moralizing my choices.
Fair enough I was well into my second bottle of Chablis when I wrote that…
What do you think the goal of this propaganda would be? If it’s not true, and enemies of the US believe it is, that they attack isolated US bases on in other nations? To what benefit?
The scientists and experts in most things throughout most of the US government that had the spine and integrity to stand up to blatant bullshit, lies, and crimes were either fired or resigned. That includes high ranking military who would refuse illegal orders. What’s left is a mountain of the least capable and most corrupt willing to bend the knee and kiss the ass.
You genuinely think if Trump kept insisting on something this stupid they would refuse his orders? Or that Trump isn’t stupid enough to insist? Or that he takes heed to wise counsel?
They’ll just print money and pay Lockheed Martin to build a shit ton more
Americans are idiots for allowing this debt on their ledger.
Ah yes. Like every government asks their populace what atrocities they’d like to commit. I hate an argument by hypocrisy, but your statement is stupid. The majority of Americans want nothing to do with this, if they even have the knowledge of how any of this economic stuff works…just the usual stupid 30% brainless sycophants.
Voting out politicians that support atrocities is a thing. Apparently you think that’s not an option for Americans even though “Americans want nothing to do with this”. If it’s important make it a voting priority. If not STFU. It’s currently not a priority.
Yeah genius, we know it’s an option. We tried that, but apparently “Genocide Joe” was a far worse choice than the senile pedo fascist kleptocrat asshat starting a huge war in the middle east, murdering people in the streets and on Caribbean boats, and wrecking the US and other economies was a far better choice. Helped along by US conservative, Russian, Chinese, and other troll farms of course
Thanks for confirming my point.
You think we actually vote on it? Both parties bomb the shit out of other countries
And accomplished sweet fuck all
They accomplished a lot:
- Throw a lifeline to Putin in the form of higher oil prices.
- Further undermine the international standing of the US.
- Make a complete mockery of whatever rules based order they’ve pretended to support.
- Encourage Xi to move against Taiwan.
The dismantling of the American empire is proceeding according to plan.
Don’t forget that stockpiled weapons don’t make any profit. You have to use them to create the need to make more. And make the military industrial complex more money. And those who speculate on those same companies.
deleted by creator
Underrated comment. A lot of people don’t realize it’s only about money and always has been; the kleptocrats ruining this country only care about one thing: line must go up
Except murdering children in their school. This fuckup should be attached to any title that involves Iran war.
Which was not an accident since they were “precision missiles”
Third hand info, but I heard on a podcast a few months back that the building had been an irgc hideout… like 10 months prior. With the administration’s complete knob-gobbling of AI, and no assets on the ground to provide updated intel, it’s likely that the AI said “shoot that one”, no one bothered to check before pushing the button, and the fathers and brothers of 150 little girls became all the more radicalized against the US.
So I wrote that, then decided to do more research than the DOD did and double-check things.
It’s worse than I wrote.
It was an IRGC building adjacent to an IRGC compound… in 2016. (the podcaster misspoke and said months instead of years)
[https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/mar/26/ai-got-the-blame-for-the-iran-school-bombing-the-truth-is-far-more-worrying](This article from The Guardian) details it quite well.
The building in Minab had been classified as a military facility in a Defense Intelligence Agency database that, according to CNN, had not been updated to reflect that the building had been separated from the adjacent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps compound and converted into a school, a change that satellite imagery shows had occurred by 2016 at the latest. A chatbot did not kill those children. People failed to update a database, and other people built a system fast enough to make that failure lethal.
The school was near a base, a lot of the parents were officers. They tripple-tapped the school hoping to use dead children as bait to kill their parents.
So glad we’ve been spending billions building and stockpiling these things for my entire life, only to run out after [checks notes] six months of bullshit that accomplished nothing.
Time to buy Lockhead Martin and Raytheon stocks before they hand the resupply bill to the Dems after midterms! /s ?
Nah. Lockheed makes both the ATACMS and the PrSM.
Ooooo…a one stop shop!
Turns out giving a low IQ pedo the keys to the kingdom isn’t such a great idea.
Really wish conservatives/regressives weren’t so painfully stupid/bigoted.
The keys were for a bunch of expensive bullshit though.
Yes, the idiot deciding to use them is a problem - but so is the fact that they don’t work. America was bragging that other nations would find out why they don’t have healthcare . . . .except there’s not even the capability they thought they had.
What colour would you like your dragon?
Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS)
Count on the army to refer to their missiles as "attack 'em"s.
Somebody was eating the Omega3-enriched crayons the day they came up with that
Assuming they were smart enough to eat them and not shove them up their nose.
The billionaires need to pony up now so we can build more.
You know that’s not how this works
There is simply no productive capacity for it. You can spend however many billions you want, but dollars don’t magically turn into factories or rare earth metals.
That doesn’t mean you can’t order and pay for them (i.e. give the tax payers money to your friends).
See: GPU and RAM manufacturing.
