Gee, who didn’t see that coming a million miles away.
He was going to do this regardless. Like, we all get that right?
Now he’s just going to point and whine that he should be able to because Biden pardoned Hunter. I mean, I agree that he was going to at least try anyway, but this just allows him and his followers to use the “both sides” argument
Eh, I doubt anyone who wasn’t already going to agree with him will be swayed by the" both sides". We should probably stop caring what arguments they’re going to use about stuff, no one’s on that side because of arguments.
Unfortunately, the “liberal media” often give them a big assist with the “both sides” thing, but, yeah, point taken. People need to stop caring what the Enlightened Centrists ™ and the wingers are going to say.
“What about Hunter Biden?” was so old, it was a gag in the Netflix mocumentary “Death to 2020” that came out 4 years ago. And we’re still hearing “What about Hunter Biden?”. Ugh.
Everyone asks"what about Hunter Biden" but no-one asks “how about Hunter Biden”
… Wait, that doesn’t really work
Who about Hunter Biden?
How many of about Hunter Biden?
Toss him a red striped shirt, and you can play Where’s Hunter Biden.
deleted by creator
I’ll do you one better: When about Hunter Biden?!
Hunter when a Biden bout?
Oh boy, cannibalism.
Lol a pardon doesn’t work for anyone but the pardoned person. Why is this even an argument?
When you fling a tonne of shit at the wall, somethings bound to stick.
You get out of jail free? Then me too me too, memememememememememe!
Wonder what the 2 million other prisoners are thinking now
As president, could Trump pardon himself?
Probably not. The Hush Money case is a state case, not a federal case. Presidential pardons (up till this point) are only valid for federal crimes.
Doesnt matter. The case is dead. By the time he is out of office, he’d be too old.
He was never going to prison to begin with, even if Kamala won. Some lawyer is gonna argue its unsafe for a former president to be in prison and supreme court would side with the trump lawyer, so he’d at worst, be in house arrest for like maybe a few months.
I would settle for house arrest with no access to social media posting.
Maybe in the alternate timeline where Kamala won. Here, we get a demented old man ranting on live tv with the nuclear button on his twitchy fingers…
Some lawyer is gonna argue its unsafe for a former president to be in prison
What, with his Secret Service bodyguards?
Putting aside the specific matter of jurisdiction (state level cases require state level pardons), legal experts widely agree that the concept of a self-pardon does not exist in pretty much any body of law, ever, because it basically refutes the idea of there being a body of law.
But, given that the supreme court decided that the president is a god-king emperor, the fact that he can’t legally do it no longer really matters.
But, given that the supreme court decided that the president is a god-king emperor, the fact that he can’t legally do it no longer really matters.
That’s what I was wondering about
The answer, as I understand it, is basically “Who the fuck knows?”
Every serious legal analyst seems to agree that the SC’s immunity decision is, uh… I think the technical term is “Total fucking lunacy.” It makes no sense, destroys a lot of existing legal precedent, and generally overturns many of the foundational principles of the US constitution. It’s batshit crazy, and the actual terms of the immunity and how it’s defined are astonishingly vague.
What the president can or cannot do right now is more or less “???”
The SC case can be summarized as “Can the president commit crimes?” “Probably. Tell us what crime it is and we will decide later”
Authoritarians have only one reason: “Because I said so.”
because it basically refutes the idea of there being a body of law
So does money being the same as speech. So does presidential immunity.
There seems to be a pattern here.
Not the state case. He has the power at the federal level only.
Trump accepting the pardon from himself means he’s guilty but gets no consequences, sort of maintaining the status quo.
Trump accepting the pardon from himself means he’s guilty
Accepting a pardon does not require an admission of guilt. That’s a myth. There is no part of the pardon process where you are required to admit guilt
In fact, pardons have been issued because the pardoning authority determined that a person has been wrongly convicted. And at the federal level, general pardons have also been issued. In the case of a general pardon, if you accept one, what are you pleading guilty to? Every possible potential crime covered by the pardon?
Garland was dicta. It was also bullshit.
He’s convicted but not charged, does anyone really think it’ll be bad politically to just pardon himself? Is sycophants don’t care and clearly don’t have memories past 4 years.
Trump doesn’t care how anything looks. He loves to violate laws and civilized norms of behavior, he thinks it makes him look strong.
WTAF.
