• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t have a religion so anyone that uses their’s to try to enforce their rules on me can hang

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      same with their end times bullshit. look pal I don’t believe in your invisible friend, I REALLY don’t believe in the entire fanfic franchise much less care which one wins your WWE headcannon shit.

  • Signtist@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The issue is that the vast majority of people don’t view religion as “what I should or shouldn’t do.” They view it as “what should and shouldn’t be done.” They can’t just follow the tenants themselves; in order to follow their religion - at least not the way they interpret it - they need to make sure the tenants are being universally followed. That’s why religion is always at odds with society as a whole unless that society is already overbearingly religious. It will never change unless there are no major groups within society with different beliefs than the norm.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Be cool if we could convince them that there were a limited number of souls allowed in heaven (say, 144K) and it was to their benefit to steer other away from the righteous path to enhance their chances (of course that could be what they are doing now, for all I know).

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Also with christianity, they’re literally instructed by their holy book to punish you the moment you heard about their god and you decide to not convert.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “My religion prohibits it!”

    THEN DON’T FUCKING DO IT.

    Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m a gynecologist. My religion says I can’t do an abortion.

      I would say that if “you” won’t perform an abortion, “you” are not actually a gynecologist. Go study and practice urology, or proctology, or gastroenterology, or oncology, or neurology, or cardiology, or dermatology, or any other field where “you” will not be called upon to perform a simple, routine procedure.

      • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s what you’d assume, but again in my country this is not a rare situation. Yes, people literally spend years studying to become gynecologists, and then don’t want to do one of the important parts of their job.

        Admittedly, it is believed that many of the gynecologists actually do the abortions… in private clinics where they work in along with their job in the public hospital.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I would call that “fraud”. In declaring themselves “gynecologists”, they are effectively advertising that they are qualified and willing to perform routine gynecological procedures. Their refusal to do so constitutes a fraud on patients seeking such services.

          “Neonatology”, “Histology”, “Reproductive physiology” and “Reproductive biology” are comparable specialty fields wherein the practitioner would not be expected to perform elective abortions.

          Additionally, if they would prefer to call themselves “general practitioners”, I would be far more lenient in allowing them to define their own scope of practice.

    • JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      if the person on the counter says it disagrees with their religion

      “Dont go to the pharmacy on wednesdays because that bitch Mary is on shift.”

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think because most religious tenets are more restrictive rather than permissive, it’s easy to say “everyone should have the freedom to practice their own religion.”, but the part that gets left out is “including no religion at all.” and that is an important distinction.

      Whenever I meet these types of psycho Christian nationalists who think it’s A-OK to impose their own regressive views on others by rewriting the law to be a reflection of their holy text, I just fire back with an even more regressive, barbaric interpretation of a religious commandment.

      “I worship Ba’al Hamon, and my religion says I must sacrifice an infant child to gain his favor. I will lobby my congressmen to change the law to add an exception to infanticide when performing a ritualistic blood offering. Oh, what’s that? You don’t like that? Gee, and you were so gung-ho about forcing people to abide by your religious demands a second ago. I thought we were cool with forcing our beliefs on other people?”

      If your religion can’t coexist with nonbelievers without forcibly bending them to your rules, it’s a shit religion.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You provided a good counterpoint. These self-imposed restrictions can become obstructive or even weaponized. It’s like a variation of weaponized incompetence.

      These restrictions can also lead to people making onerous demands of others to accommodate.

    • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I want to learn to give abortions by hitting pressure points. Ahem, hey baby ready for a back massage? Great, let’s do it in the garage or shed.

  • bigchungus@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    More honest:

    My religion says I can’t do that.

    I don’t care.

    My religion says you can’t do that.

    I don’t care.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    love how the bible literally says public displays of faith and prayer is wrong yet people who’ve never read the bible will claim otherwise.

    Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven. “Thus, when you give to the needy, sound no trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you. “And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      🤔 I understand this more like “Don’t practice the religion as a way to show off. Don’t make a YouTube/TikTok/whatever video giving a homeless man $100. Just give the guy $100 and STFU about it. Also, stop posting prayers in comment sections on social media; it seems fake, and you make the rest of us look silly too.”

      I’m not a bible guy though, so idk

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      For what it’s worth, that’s not an especially relevant passage here, as it’s less to do with being open about your faith and moreso about intent. For example, those who would go to the synagogue to pray or who would give alms to make themselves feel better and appear righteous. The Bible is crystal clear that you should be openly expressing your faith to others should the intent be to spread the religion. Mark 16:15–16, for example, reads (NIV):

      He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned."

      Probably more relevant for your case are the passages along the lines of: “Look, give it the old college try, but if they aren’t willing to listen, don’t be a bitch about it; just move on.” For example:

      Matthew 5:43–44:

      “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,

      Matthew 7:1–3:

      “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

      “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?

      Matthew 10:13–15

      If the home is deserving, let your peace rest on it; if it is not, let your peace return to you. If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, leave that home or town and shake the dust off your feet. Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.

      The Parable of the Weeds.

      Etc.

      • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        My brother was studying to become a Jesuit and there was this running joke amongst the Jesuits about praying where they would go “Why? God doesn’t exist.” This may sound hypocritical and it kind of is, but they consider the religion more a moral framework rather than something to rigorously believe in. That’s also why Pope Francis resonated with many non-believers because, at least the modern Jesuits, apply the moral lessons of the New Testament with a healthy dose of rationality (they are considered the intellectual branch of the church for a reason).

        Very few, if any, Jesuit these days believe in the existence of a god, but they find value in the moral framework and how they can apply that to make this world a better place. It’s the only religious order I can stomach to have conversations with.

        • otacon239@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          24 hours ago

          This right here I think is the ultimate way to practice religion. It’s an excellent framework for helping understand your connection to the universe and how your morality intertwines.

          I’ve been reading up on Taoism and one of the things I resonated with is that it accepts the idea that you can worship anything. Even a rock. It’s not about actually believing that the thing holds power, but rather allowing yourself to give in a bit to the universe in an understanding that you are ultimately powerless. You have to give up some of your agency to the idea that there is power beyond your control and understanding and you have to accept that.

          If you believe you’re an individual being separate from the world around you, the world will catch up to that idea. Aggressively. But if you accept that the world does not cater to you, and if you surrender some of that responsibility to a higher power, you’re not nearly as blindsided when the world finds you.

    • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Uhuh, more from your Bibble.

      “Let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father in heaven.” Matthew chapter five verse sixteen

    • otterpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s the intent that matters here, not all public displays of faith go against the teachings of Jesus. But yeah, someone doing it just to draw attention is wrong.

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        lol, jesus said “do as I mean, not as I say!” “What do you mean, Jesus?” “Listen closely:”

        It’s that kind of double think that dulls the critical mind over time

  • Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Whenever I tell people I don’t drink tea or coffee because of my religion the conversation goes like this

    “Your Mormon?!”

    “Not really, not so much anymore”

    “So why don’t you drink it now?!”

    “Because it’s gross. It’s an acquired taste I never acquired “

    “How do you wake up then?”

    “Cocaine”

    Edit: I don’t like the taste of cocaine either but I love how it smells.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I think the disconnect comes from the phrasing of the first sentence. Perhaps combine it with the third?

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I was never a coffee drinker for unrelated reasons, and also never acquired the taste for it even though the smell is generally nice.

      But now I’m in my 40s and have multiple medical conditions (i.e., more than just the AuDHD, lol) that are treated with stimulants, so I will usually supplement my adderall with a cup of coffee in the morning and one at lunch time.

      The nice thing is that I don’t have decades of tolerance and habit around the stuff, so it is still nice and potent. Instead of adding a bunch of junk to it, I just let it cool off then drink it quickly or add a chocolate protein shake to it for a few breakfast calories if I didn’t eat.

      Plus even though I don’t like the taste I think the coffee at work is decent because it’s a machine that grinds whole beans, and the operations manager for our location fills the hopper with the beans himself. Some Starbucks somebody gave me recently tasted rotten in comparison. And that’s not “mischievous child” rotten, that’s carcass rotten.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Some Starbucks somebody gave me recently tasted rotten in comparison

        Sbucks always tastes like dogshit because they burn the absolute shit out of their beans. No one goes there to taste coffee, they go because they want caffeinated vanilla pumpkin mace choco cinnamon. I can’t imagine they started that way when they were a little shop in seattle so I think when they exploded they needed a consistent flavor as the base, and the way they accomplished that was by over roasting all the variations out of the beans they got.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I have pretty severe adhd. Going thru treatment options now because cocaine isnt the standard treatment lol

        I drink a lot of soda and before cocaine I was up to 4 amp energy drinks a day plus the sodas.

        I was totally one of those “don’t talk to me until I’ve had coffee “ but with energy drinks

  • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The first is how many think it works, but it’s just a ruse. It’s always the second, and religious magical thinking always results in social positions and votes that are damaging and regressive.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Out of curiousity, which one is this?

      And whether you look under the rug, is that true in all texts of the religion?

      • aarch0x40@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Buddhism, more specifically vajrayana.

        I think it’s better understood amongst practitioners that if you don’t walk the path then you’re not really a Buddhist.  I know this is true of pretty much all religions but there’s no, what I call, John 3:16 clause.  There are many Christian’s who think just believing in Jesus.  This may be true in other religions too but I’m from Christianity.  Buddhism gave me a different perspective on what it means to believe though.  To believe in a teacher is to follow and apply those teachings through every aspect existence.  Believe or take refuge in the teaching, not the vehicle that delivered that teaching.