• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I continued to be amazed that they ran Al Franken out of town over much, much less than this.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Al Franken was a threat because he was popular and progressive.

      So the Dem party lied to him, they told him that they couldn’t afford the circus of a hearing (that they could have just not had) so they told him to resign, then they’d do the investigation and clear his name so he could run again.

      As soon as he resigned, the same Dems told him that there was no point in a hearing.

      He got kneecapped by his own party and people still try to act like it wasn’t a big deal.

      The neoliberals running the party aren’t on our side, they were bought off long ago.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I think it was also a timing and a party composition issue. Dems were scared because women and feminists are a big part of their coalition, and the Frankenstein story happened at the height of MeToo so they were more worried about backlash.

        Republicans have a consistently popular leader who is widely known to be a sexual predator so it’s apparent that there’s little danger from their base regarding this. The only reason Gaetz got any scrutiny at all for this is because he’s a shithead who is personally disliked by many of his party in congress.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I agree completely, except I don’t think ‘bought off’ is the best way to characterize the rich consistently acting in their own interests. Democratic party leadership doesn’t need a bribe or inducement to attack working people and the left, it’s the job they signed up for.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I agree completely, except I don’t think ‘bought off’ is the best way to characterize the rich consistently acting in their own interests

          A lot of politicians aren’t “rich” when first elected especially for the House the only way to get rich is shady shit like campaign corruption or insider trading.

          The party leadership are defending themselves because like we were just shown, they won’t let anyone into the VIP area if they’re not dirty.

          They know Connolly won’t do the job, because he’s corrupt too.

          You can’t fight corruption from the bottom up, that’s what Biden just tried to do with 1/6, they never got close to anyone who caused it.

          For corruption you got to work top down. That’s what AOC would have done, and that would have been going after Pelosi because every Republican would vote with AOC to do that.