• almost1337@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Having grown up near a US Navy base in the 90s, I can still tell the difference between an A-6, F-14, or F-18 by sound.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Can’t do it by sound but because of the amount of hours I’ve wasted in war thunder, I can pretty much get every military aircraft at airshows when they’re 2k ft in the air and just passing overhead because I was too cheap to actually buy tickets to the airshow.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For the movie Grand Prix (1967), they put microphones inside of each car’s engine, so that they would get the distinct sound of each just right. They also recorded the sounds of the upshifts and downshifts of each car while driving the Monaco Grand Prix course, and then the professional drivers recreated the dozens of shifts in sequence from memory on a runway to make sure they got clean audio of the entire race.

    Honestly, if you look at how that movie was made, I’m not convinced that they should have been allowed to make it… but I’m glad that they did, because it’s an astonishing technical achievement.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      TBF one learns the shifting sequences for any track pretty easily in sim racing. I judge how well I’m doing on a particular lap by whether I’m shifting later than usual.

      I have more trouble imagining them doing braking accurately, as presumably they’d need to record that too, and it’s typically done from visual references. Also they’d need 3.2 km of presumably straight runway to avoid them having to do actual turns — might’ve had to use salt flats or somesuch.

      P.S. That movie is also a great example of how a decent 70mm film is still a splendid source for ‘hd’ video and will probably be re-digitized decades from now into new ‘100k’ formats.

  • neidu4@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    A lot of ww2 aircraft have very recognizable sounds, though.

    Rotary engines have a distinctive sound, where the pitch is affected by the amount of cylinders… so if you know how many cylinders your favorite early bomber has, you can probably tell it apart from the others. Usually an odd number for some mechanical reason I never quite understood, so there aren’t that many to choose from.

    Ju87 (aka stuka) had the siren mounted on the lead aircraft and when you think of that sound a plane makes in a steep dive, that’s why

    Not that many aircraft used a V12 engine, so if you guess that it’s a spitfire or P51 mustang because it sounds like an F1 car, chances that you are wrong are small. Well, the bf109 does, but nobody likes that aircraft for its sound.

    • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Rotary engines have a distinctive sound, where the pitch is affected by the amount of cylinders… so if you know how many cylinders your favorite early bomber has, you can probably tell it apart from the others.

      “See, you don’t have to be autistic to recognize airplane sounds. You just need to memorize the cylinder count of every WW2 bomber aircraft.”

  • Major_Tsiom@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I can tell a radial from a V12. I am a little autistic, but I don’t think you need to be on that one…