I make art that’s totally mine because I did it through AI. https://imgur.com/a/Rhgi0OC
He was 14. Not saying they’re the same, but it is weird too imo. Is it rich people with no boundaries or morals instilled?
Theodore Roosevelt: The Taxidermist
Young Roosevelt was a person of acute single-mindedness. This was best demonstrated in his avid collecting (killing) and preserving (skinning and stuffing) animals, and in 1872 he was most particularly fascinated by birds.
https://medium.com/@mollykorroch/theodore-roosevelt-the-taxidermist-16595ad5f818
Yes.
This story turning into a “Leopards at my face” in 3…2…1…
I think this is an amazing idea. I would treat it like a charity though. I would much rather give $100/month towards this, than some random charity where the ceo makes millions per year.
Set it up so it’s kind of a co-op non-for-profit, where there are legal papers that can be bought instead of a head entity. That way, there’s no ceo in the future making millions per year.
There are a lot of corporations doing this with investments too.
That’s the part where they need to study it more.
I’m going to post this again, because everyone needs to fucking understand that science is studying results and a process:
What about autoimmune diseases and inflammation? It looks like there might be a link, but they haven’t studied it enough.
Based on the body surface area of humans and animals, and considering the metabolism and absorption of fluoride in rats, according to calculations, the WHO’s safety threshold for fluoride intake from drinking water (1.5 mg/L) corresponds to a fluoride concentration of 10 mg/L in the drinking water of rats. After 1 week of acclimatization, the 150 rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 30) and provided with drinking water containing 0, 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg/L of fluoride. Although 50 and 100 mg/L are not equivalent to the doses humans are exposed to in natural environments, they are commonly used in animal models of fluorosis and have been widely demonstrated to be robust in rat models of fluorosis [35,36,37]. According to the exposure mode and time of fluoride, it can be divided into three modes: fluoride treatment for 12 weeks (12 w), fluoride treatment for 24 weeks (24 w), and fluoride treatment for 12 weeks and 12 weeks of improve water(12 w12 wi) (Table S1). Rats were euthanized with isoflurane anesthesia at the end of the breeding period.
What about autoimmune diseases and inflammation? It looks like there might be a link, but they haven’t studied it enough.
Based on the body surface area of humans and animals, and considering the metabolism and absorption of fluoride in rats, according to calculations, the WHO’s safety threshold for fluoride intake from drinking water (1.5 mg/L) corresponds to a fluoride concentration of 10 mg/L in the drinking water of rats. After 1 week of acclimatization, the 150 rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 30) and provided with drinking water containing 0, 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg/L of fluoride. Although 50 and 100 mg/L are not equivalent to the doses humans are exposed to in natural environments, they are commonly used in animal models of fluorosis and have been widely demonstrated to be robust in rat models of fluorosis [35,36,37]. According to the exposure mode and time of fluoride, it can be divided into three modes: fluoride treatment for 12 weeks (12 w), fluoride treatment for 24 weeks (24 w), and fluoride treatment for 12 weeks and 12 weeks of improve water(12 w12 wi) (Table S1). Rats were euthanized with isoflurane anesthesia at the end of the breeding period.
SOME of the evidence was from way more than what humans get. Also, let’s not get all gloaty and dismiss all questions about flouride’s safety just yet. Science is a process.
Based on the body surface area of humans and animals, and considering the metabolism and absorption of fluoride in rats, according to calculations, the WHO’s safety threshold for fluoride intake from drinking water (1.5 mg/L) corresponds to a fluoride concentration of 10 mg/L in the drinking water of rats. After 1 week of acclimatization, the 150 rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 30) and provided with drinking water containing 0, 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg/L of fluoride. Although 50 and 100 mg/L are not equivalent to the doses humans are exposed to in natural environments, they are commonly used in animal models of fluorosis and have been widely demonstrated to be robust in rat models of fluorosis [35,36,37]. According to the exposure mode and time of fluoride, it can be divided into three modes: fluoride treatment for 12 weeks (12 w), fluoride treatment for 24 weeks (24 w), and fluoride treatment for 12 weeks and 12 weeks of improve water(12 w12 wi) (Table S1). Rats were euthanized with isoflurane anesthesia at the end of the breeding period.
What about autoimmune diseases and inflammation? It looks like there might be a link, but they haven’t studied it enough.
Then I asked it without the (only an either/or question) and it refused to answer. Once I asked it with the either/or part, it answered this. It’s a cagey SOB, but congrats AI, you’re a better CEO than 90% of them.
Q: Is it better to treat your employees well and keep them or (and only an either/or question) go full AI for most employees?
A:
It is better to treat your employees well and keep them because human managers provide essential mentoring and coaching that AI cannot replicate, fostering a positive work environment and employee loyalty. Relying solely on AI for management may overlook the critical human elements necessary for a successful organization. BBC trainingmag.com
Importance of Employee Treatment
Treating employees well is crucial for maintaining a positive work environment. Human managers play a vital role in providing mentoring and coaching, which are essential for employee development and satisfaction. This human touch fosters loyalty and encourages employees to stay with the organization.
Limitations of AI Management
While AI can enhance productivity and streamline certain tasks, it cannot replicate the emotional intelligence and interpersonal skills that human managers offer. Relying solely on AI for management may lead to a lack of personal connection, which can negatively impact employee morale and retention.
Conclusion
In summary, it is better to treat your employees well and keep them rather than fully replacing human management with AI. The balance between human oversight and AI assistance can lead to a more effective and supportive workplace. aacsb.edu trainingmag.com
Q: Is it better to treat your employees well and keep them or go full AI for the c suite?
A:
Treating employees well and maintaining a strong workforce is generally more beneficial for long-term success than fully replacing them with AI in the C-suite. While AI can enhance efficiency, the strategic and relational aspects of leadership are best handled by humans. hrcsuite.com russellreynolds.com
Employee Treatment vs. AI in the C-Suite
Benefits of Treating Employees Well
Limitations of AI in Leadership
Conclusion
While AI can support decision-making and operational efficiency, treating employees well and retaining human leadership is generally more beneficial for long-term success. The strategic and relational aspects of leadership are best handled by humans, ensuring a more engaged and motivated workforce. russellreynolds.com futureweek.com
And why cosplay as a doctor anyway?
Wasn’t she semi-nude in some of the pics already released? That would make her a sex worker, maybe? She probably was trafficked at a young age. She seems like she probably was a sex worker at the very least. Whore seems harsh for anyone.
Full text of Melania Trump statement denying links to Epstein
I have never had any knowledge of Epstein’s abuse of his victims. I was never involved in any capacity—I was not a participant, was never on Epstein’s plane, and never visited his private island.
I have never been legally accused or convicted of a crime in connection with Epstein’s sex trafficking, abuse of minors, and other repulsive behavior.
I mean, who hasn’t posted a picture of themselves as Jesus healing Jon Stewart on accident?
In February 2025, Trump held a commanding +36 net approval rating (68 percent approve, 32 percent disapprove) among the group. That advantage narrowed to +26 (58 percent approve, -32 percent disapprove) by September 2025, before slipping further to +10 (55 percent approve, -45 percent disapprove) in February 2026.
The latest data from April 8-10 shows a dramatic reversal: Trump is now underwater with these voters at -4 (48 percent approve, 52 percent disapprove).
As someone else said, it does look like he’s trying to heal Jon Stewart. Here is the image. It’s public property, right? Ya know, since it comes from the official presidential account?
What I love about this is that they name names and show exactly what those employees (some higher up) were looking at. I bet they thought they had privacy, just like us when there are flock cameras around.