Nuance? I’m valid. If I accidentally walk into a bank demanding money, can you spin that?
ICE is valid, but are way outside the scope they have historically been used for, with a flood of barely trained new people, going where they’re not wanted, to terrorize the population on the flimsy excuse of immigrants. They somehow believe they’re above the law and their victims are beneath it. If your “nuance” is this entire mission is criminal, ok. But there’s no nuance saying you can go this far into depriving people of rights, then claim that executing them is an accident
Sure and maybe it’s all of our fault for accepting that. It’s easy to say they can abbreviate due diligence when you’re picturing them chasing people who are in the process of physically sneaking across the border. Especially when it’s balanced with people already established were generally treated as a civil infraction and with a defined process rather than violent criminal infraction
Nuance? I’m valid. If I accidentally walk into a bank demanding money, can you spin that?
ICE is valid, but are way outside the scope they have historically been used for, with a flood of barely trained new people, going where they’re not wanted, to terrorize the population on the flimsy excuse of immigrants. They somehow believe they’re above the law and their victims are beneath it. If your “nuance” is this entire mission is criminal, ok. But there’s no nuance saying you can go this far into depriving people of rights, then claim that executing them is an accident
Border and immigration enforcement has always been questionable from a theoretical and practical level
Sure and maybe it’s all of our fault for accepting that. It’s easy to say they can abbreviate due diligence when you’re picturing them chasing people who are in the process of physically sneaking across the border. Especially when it’s balanced with people already established were generally treated as a civil infraction and with a defined process rather than violent criminal infraction