• Balldowern@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Why isn’t the FBI doing anything about Epstein island list ? That’s more important than some archive website.

    • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      It occasionally catches things that archive.org misses too. Also really nice to have an alternative.

      It’d be nice to have a way of doing decentralised archiving while still keeping the trust. If you’re trying to prove that a site really said something at a certain date to another person, pointing to your own archive is kinda useless.

        • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          It would help! It would establish that an archive was made no later than the date it was recorded on a blockchain (assuming the archiver isn’t also the one the made the original content in which case they can upload it after making the “archive”). You would still need to prove the trustworthiness of the archived data and at the moment the only thing we have for that is just trusting the archiver.

          You could do something like have multiple archivers archive the same site in s stripped down for like plain text (so that differences caused by time or day, ads, etc don’t change the hash) and that way you can say that X amount of archivers agree that the site looked like that at that time.

      • eah@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        The administration didn’t threaten to take down the IA or investigate it or anything like that, so it’s not similar at all.

        It’s conspiratorial to think the FBI is doing this to censor or hide something. archive.is is primarily used to get around paywalls. The most likely explanation is news sites complained to the FBI that their copyrights are being violated (which is true), so the FBI is investigating. They’ve had a problem with falling revenue for a decade or more at this point as everything went online and people expected to get instant access for free in contrast to print media.

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    As a Canadian I believe we should build a wall, not just a physical wall but a digital wall.

    It’s just to provide a layer of fuck you to the Americans.

  • girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    The owner should release the source code / configuration, in whatever state it’s in, before things escalate further. It’d suck for all their work to go down the drain. I’m sure there’d be people willing to adopt the project and host instances.

    If you agree and you have Tumblr, would you consider asking them anonymously?

    https://blog.archive.today/ask

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    That would explain why adguard’s public DNS started blocking it (labeled vaguely as “legal request”).

    • Dethronatus Sapiens sp.@calckey.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      @a_person@piefed.social @silence7@slrpnk.net @technology@lemmy.world

      Same when I tried to access the archived version of the linked article of this thread. I was faced by a TLS error I never saw before (SSL_ERROR_INTERNAL_ERROR_ALERT), so I thought the Archive Today was facing server-side issues, until I decided to try accessing through the smartphone, and no error happened there.

      I only managed to access Archive Today through my computer after disabling several security things, which seems quite suspicious, as if the Archive Today were being hijacked by a MitM (possibly the FBI themselves? They’re famous for setting up honeypots) who were trying to push malicious code/tracking to whomever access it.

      I would be further worried if I were USian or a citizen from Global North (as I’m Brazilian and from Global South, I can tell the FBI to go pound sand, lol).

      To USians, my suggestion is caution accessing Archive Today (at least the current IP address being pointed at by mainstream DNS resolvers) for a while, as the server, while seemingly Archive Today, may be actually some kind of FBI honeypot in disguise. It goes without saying how ICANN and IANA are US entities, prone to interference from three-lettered US agencies. There are alternatives to Archive Today, such as Ghost Archive and 12ft.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    The news sites are trying to have it both ways. Serving the news articles to visitors and then covering them up with a paywall with browser tricks.

  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    The archive runs Apache Hadoop and Apache Accumulo. All data is stored on HDFS, textual content is duplicated 3 times among servers in 2 datacenters and images are duplicated 2 times. Both datacenters are in Europe, with OVH hosting at least one of them.

    To avoid detection, archive.today runs via a botnet that cycles through countless IP addresses, making it quite difficult for grumpy webmasters to stop their sites getting scraped. Access to paywalled sites is through logins secured via unclear means, which need to be replenished constantly: here’s the creator asking for Instagram credentials. Finally, the serving of the website is also subject to a perpetual game of cat and mouse: “I can only predict that there will be approximately one trouble with domains per year and each fifth trouble will result in domain loss.” As of today, archive.today still works, but users are redirected to archive.md.