Summary

President Biden recently authorized Ukraine to use longer-range U.S. missiles to strike inside Russia, marking a small but overdue escalation in the conflict.

This decision aims to disrupt Russia’s military operations and bolster Ukraine’s position, especially with the potential Trump administration favoring pro-Russian policies.

Russia’s retaliatory missile strike on Ukraine, though deadly, represents more of the same tactics.

Analysts argue Biden’s earlier caution was excessive, and calling Russia’s nuclear bluffs is strategically necessary to counter further extortion.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Russia isn’t starting WW3, because there’s literally no possible way for them to survive doing that.

        They can’t even beat Ukraine in a straight fight, and they know it. They are woefully ill equipped to take on all of NATO.

        No matter how much damage they could potentially do if they tried, the ending is guaranteed; Russia and its current leadership do not exist.

        The Russian leadership are vain, greedy, and power hungry, and the thing about those traits is they make you very, very averse to personal risk. They’re not going to take any action that puts them in the firing line.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’m actually pretty doubtful that Russia still has much of a nuclear capacity. Maintaining a nuclear arsenal is very expensive, and the Russian oligarchs have been embezzling massive amounts of money from the military.

        They’ve had to resort to asking NK for help, so I don’t think they have a good chance of winning the current conflict, much less an actual NATO power.