Right when he’s completely useless, he pushes for this. Pathetic and disingenuous.

  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The only thing they didn’t do good on was that one small genocide they enabled, hah oops lmao

    • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s such a good thing there is an alternative that really, really great at stopping genocides. We are so happy that now those evil genocidal maniacs will be out of the office and there will be no genocides forever. They will finally stop pressing that genocide button that they have, which controls genocides.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Biden didn’t need to sell weapons to Netanyahu. Your “magic button’” shit trivializes what you’re glad Biden did to enable genocide for you.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        This reads as sarcasm. Except its not so much a button that stops genocides, its… a different mechanism

        Edit: evidently this was not clear enough. The mechanism is not legal to mention.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Every genocide has to stop eventually. Otherwise it’s not a very effective genocide…

        • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I am starting to believe that Americans trully believe there is a mechanism that starts and stops genocides and it’s located within reach of the American president. This notion is so fucking wild it’s impossible to believe y’all really totally thinking it, but it is jingoistic enough for me to start believing y’all are bathsit insane enough for it.

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            If the US stopped giving armaments and money to Israel once it became clear what they were doing and then followed up with actual punitive measures yes it would have stopped it. Israel is committing genocide with the approval of the US.

          • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If every politician that supports genocide gets removed from office, the genocides stop. What a surprise.

            • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Do you also believe they have egg prices dial? Oh, by the way, you got your wish, the current administration will be removed from the office, if a genocide will not stop in February, will you eat your words and admit that you were wrong or not?

              • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                So, did you not read what I said? I said “all politicians that support genocides get removed, genocides stop”

                If all politicians that support genocides get removed, and yet america is still somehow magically supporting genocide, yes, ill eat my words. Itd be real difficult to eat though, as that is fundamentally impossible.

                Also comparing a genocide to egg prices is facetious and in bad faith. If you pull another strawman like that im going to assume you are a troll and stop engaging.

              • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Considering they can subsidize anything they want, kind of, yes. Why can’t we have a small temporary subsidy when the chickens get sick on a massive scale? Is that too logical?

          • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            s such a good thing there is an alternative that really, really great at stopping genocides.

            I read this as saying both sides (Republicans and Democrats) support genocide.

            • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I mean they do. Theyre different in a lot of ways, i wouldnt normally dare compare the two. But as evidenced by bidens administration and their ineptitude, they dont really care about genocides or the poor. Thats not to say theyre the same. One side doesnt care, the other is actively malicious.