• buffaloseven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Count me in the group of people sad to see it go because it made it very easy to get articles onto my Kobo e-reader. There are other ways, but they’re all too labour intensive to be practical. Probably should have seen the writing on the wall, though.

  • Darren@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a Kobo user who sends articles to my Kobo via Pocket A LOT, this is some hefty bullshit.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really disappointed to lose Pocket. I am a big user of it and found it very convenient to save articles of interest as well as collecting anything that looked interesting that I might want to read. Have both the Android app and use it on the desktop.

    Now I’m going to have to find a substitute.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idiots. Buying a perfectly good service just to shut it down. I wonder if they even bothered looking for a buyer.

    Also that new logo with the flag sucks.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The moment I setup an Omnivore account, it gets acquired and dies, the moment I switch to Pocket it’s dead lol, I think I’ll just move to some open source self hosted read it later app like Karakeep

  • Gerowen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pocket is one service of theirs I did use from time to time. Save an article you want to read later without committing it to a bookmark.

  • TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an occasional user, I am sad to see it go. Are there any other sites out there to maintain a list of links that I may find useful in the future? With a web UI and not self hosted?

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never used pocket, how does this differ from just having a bookmarks folder called “stuff to read while you’re taking a shit”?

      • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pocket saved an offline searchable archive of all of the article text. Multiple times I found articles I saved that were no longer online. So no, it’s not the same as bookmarks

      • Sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pocket can save the content of an article without the formatting and ads, which you can then download to Pocket’s app for offline reading.

  • Artopal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Pocket since before Mozilla bought it. In combination with my kobo ereader, it changed the way I read the Internet for the better. Self hosting is no option for me and as far as I know Pocket was the best free read-it-later service. And the only one that worked seamless with Kobo. I really hope Rakuten buys it.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also stripped the webpage to make it readable and mostly distraction-free, plus some services will also include tag suggestions to more easily find it later.

        I used Pocket on my Kobo to read articles I saved, much easier to focus on the content and easy on the eyes with the eInk display.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you pull up a bookmarked item to read when you don’t have an active network connection? If yes, that’s a “read it later” service. If no, then that’s why they are useful.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why don’t they just open it up to let people run their own Pocket services? The usual “proprietary code” excuses make no sense for an organization like Mozilla and it’s being end of lifed anyway. Just dump it on a repo somewhere and let people hack on it if they want to. Why isn’t this part of the sunsetting plan?

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      code has been open for about 10 years. it was a binary blob to begin with but nowadays it’s all here

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    pocket I never used. I found it ugly and just s violation of privacy as it moved a service that should be local only, to external webservers. I can see why it’s finally had the plug pulled

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was redundant anyway, since it was just bookmarks with extra steps. But you can sync bookmarks between devices with Firefox anyway and you’ve been able to for years, so I have no idea why they kept it around other than to use it as a vehicle to push ads (because it seemed like roughly 25% of the “articles” it suggested to you were actually ads). I can’t say as I’m too sad to see it go.

      Fakespot could arguably have been useful on paper, but I have to admit I never used it because I treat most online reviews as if they’re bullshit anyway.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the main thing with pocket and services like it is that it saves and syncs entire pages. like a local internet archive.