- 2.08K Posts
- 133 Comments
Pro@programming.devOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•On the relevance of upvotes in relation to quality and discussionEnglish
1·3 months agoI keep saying it in this thread, any solution would work better than no solution at all.
If anyone has a better system, let them lay it out and then we can discuss and improve it.
Otherwise, looking for perfect solutions without actually implementing any one of them is going to lead to unneeded analysis paralysis for fediverse developers without solving the issue at all.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•On the relevance of upvotes in relation to quality and discussionEnglish
1·3 months agoAny real examples?
Pro@programming.devOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•On the relevance of upvotes in relation to quality and discussionEnglish
012·3 months agoJordan Peterson? Is that you?
Pro@programming.devOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•On the relevance of upvotes in relation to quality and discussionEnglish
0·3 months agodeleted by creator
Pro@programming.devOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•On the relevance of upvotes in relation to quality and discussionEnglish
2·3 months agoA lot of comments came after the high amount of upvotes.
In simpler terms, upvotes boosted the comments which allowed the comments to keep getting more irrelevant.
What I am arguing for here in general is a quality control for votes, which is desperately needed here on Lemmy.
As of now, any quality control system would work better than no quality control system at all.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•On the relevance of upvotes in relation to quality and discussionEnglish
1·3 months agoAs I said, this is not to control people upvotes, but rather to control the quality of upvotes.
The system I am laying down here is pretty simple and would need to be actually worked on to get it to a final implementation.
Something I did not talk about is the downvotes and how we can control it’s quality.
Simply put, I don’t care how you as a user vote, but I care about the sorting algorithm that sort posts based on upvotes and would be improved by the proposed change.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•Firefox for Android to raise the minimum supported version to Android 8; Support for Android 5(Lollipop), 6(Marshmallow) and 7(Nougat) to be deprecated.English
6·3 months agoAs far as I know, currently there is no supported browser.
No Chrome, No Firefox.
Pro@programming.devto
Technology@programming.dev•Zuckerberg shows failing glassesEnglish
1·3 months agoHi,
No external videos links allowed.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Technology@programming.dev•Android launcher Lawnchair 15 beta adds drawer folders, dock upgrades, and expanded searchEnglish
2·3 months agoYou are correct, I thought this release was recent. I will delete my post.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is there is any selective/professional link aggregator?English
1·3 months agoNot really fitting, as I said before, I am looking for a selective feed.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Technology@programming.dev•The FBI couldn't get my husband to decrypt his Tor nodes, so they told a judge he used his GRAPHICS DRIVER to access the "dark web" and jailed him PRE TRIAL for 3 years.English
351·3 months agoI am not the original poster, I only posted it here.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Is there is any selective/professional link aggregator?English
2·3 months agoI appreciate your help, but I am looking for something with wider coverage than Executive Orders.
Pro@programming.devOPto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Is there is any selective/professional link aggregator?English
12·3 months agoNo, I am asking about selective feed basically that only include title and link.
I don’t want the current chatgpt’ed garbage of articles written by news outlets, I just want a title, link to the official/direct source without any unneeded text.
Pro@programming.devOPto
United Kingdom@feddit.uk•UK workers wary of AI despite Starmer’s push to increase uptake: A third of those polled do not tell bosses about use of tools and half think AI threatens the social structureEnglish
7·3 months agoThank you for alerting me, I fixed it.
Hi, videos are not allowed.
Please check out the rules in the sidebar.




















One problem thou, threaded comments is no use in this use case.
In simpler terms, if you are using threaded comments social media to share memes, you are using the wrong tool/platform to view memes.