• stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As a gun owner and former small arms instructor, like… I’m happy, but I also feel like I got isekai’ed when I see fellow left sided folks imply that privately owned guns aren’t basically the equivalent of the One Ring. They are simply a tool which bestows the ABILITY to use violence at a distance. What you choose to do with that ability is entirely up to the holder. A sword can be used as a shield as well, but a shield cannot be used as a sword if needed

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Maybe not a sword, but shields can have spikes and sharp edges. Even as a blunt instrument a shield is a weapon not just a defense.

      • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        I’m going to press x on that one. What you say is true to an extent, but you would never grab a particularly pointy shield as your only weapon if you had to go on an offensive. Those things make it more effective from a defensive standpoint, but if I had to get into a fight I would choose a knife over any shield you could show me if I could only pick one, especially if I knew my opponent was going to also have an offensive weapon.

    • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ve never been on the “ban all guns” side of the argument. I’ve had access to them since I was 10 and was a line coach when I was in the Navy. I’m just glad to see some of us on the left start to get it.