• bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Please Moto, make a not gigantic 6in slab of a phone. Please make one ~5in with good specs.

  • ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    What will US do if lenevo is Chinese and owns Motorola and now the US doesn’t have backdoors like they do on Apple and Google devices.

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just got a pixel 9 refurbished for 350CAD and, a part from the irony of needing a phone made by google to have a degoogled phone, Graphene is a great OS. It just does what any basic phone os should do, and that’s make it gold in the current dystopia.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    I 100% understand and support why the moved away from google.

    And Motorola was a good choice. But they really should have supported some budget phones.

    A pixel series a could easily be found for under 500€ new. These flagship motorola phones are all way over 1000€.

    And the developer clearly said they had currently no intention to support cheaper motorola phones. Among other things because Motorola won’t offer 7 year updates for anything but these flagships.

    So, I get it. But let’s face it that people on a budget will keep using pixels for GOS while they are maintained.

    • FG_3479@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      The 2027 models will likely be flagship only however Graphene has tweeted that they plan to support cheaper Motorola phones in the future.

    • pucker4676@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      They didn’t specifically disregard budget phones. The budget phones just won’t have the hardware required to meet GrapheneOS requirements. They’ve states that as the next gen flagship hardware trickles down to the budget phones, there’ll be more options.

      • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I keep hearing this thing about the necessary hardware.

        What is this exotic piece of hardware that the GrapheneOS needs? Please, someone tell me what it is.

          • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            (nothing I am about to say is necessarily personal; I am genuinely grateful for the link!)

            Is there a table of these requirements as columns and vendors as rows?

            I think most of this list is acquired by having a modern CPU or SoC, no?

            Much of the list is software requirements.

            There is one item that sticks out:

            • Support for disabling USB data and also USB as a whole at a hardware level in the USB controller

            Just how much of the hardware list is satisfied by say having a Snapdragon SoC?

            I would prefer if people said such and such vendor is missing such and such feature which we need. Always NAME the SPECIFICS. A link to a web page with the exact specifics missing for the most popular phones would help, imo. This is clear and educational. Instead we get “they don’t got no good hardware maaaan.” It’s annoying. Looks handwavy even when it is not.

            • pucker4676@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I haven’t seem anyone respond in the way you’re complaining about.

              There’s a long list of requirements, with a big one being hardware memory tagging.

              https://www.techtimes.com/articles/325679/20260826/grapheneos-expands-motorola-better-snapdragon-radio-isolation-google-pixel.htm

              The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 — the chip inside the 2026 Motorola Signature — introduced MTE support, but only in the Elite variant. The Foundation has characterized MTE in the non-Elite Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 as effectively broken for GrapheneOS’s purposes. This is why even Motorola’s current flagship lineup cannot qualify: the chip is close but the specific hardware feature GrapheneOS treats as non-negotiable is not reliably present across the Snapdragon lineup.

    • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      These flagship motorola phones are all way over 1000€

      Yes. And now it’s not going down. See, the corporation cannot make any money off of ads and analytics if there are none.

      • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I have a Moto phone, as far as I know they have made $0 from me in analytics or ads.

        Moto phones in my experience are some of the most debloated phones out there.

    • FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      they didn’t abandon pixels though. they just take a little extra time because they have to manually update the old device trees now.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    I just want a flip phone that has 3rd party ROM support lol.

    We’re like half a decade into the flip scene and we’ve been stuck on OEM slop for too long.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    This will apply to 2027 flagship Motorola devices, starting with a regular non-folding device, according to GrapheneOS developers who hinted at it being the successor to the Signature.

    Thank goodness it won’t just be one foldable. I was worried for a bit.

    • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      All of them are foldable, many times, some just get the power button jammed at like 4 degrees and break a bit around 12 or so.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    My question is, what support will there be for NFC contactless payment? The convenience of being able to not have to carry a wallet full of cards is one of the biggest things holding me back from fully embracing GrapheneOS.

    • Nate Cox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      Graphene supports NFC, but Google wallet goes out of its way not to work on it.

      If you’re in the EU you have other wallet options, in the US you’re pretty much fucked.

      I thought I would miss digital wallets way more than I actually do. Bought a slim wallet, carry just what I need, and get all the privacy benefits of not being on mainline android.

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          I keep hearing about curve, and I saw something about walt.is just the other day… But I’m in the US without access to any of them, so I wouldn’t trust my references.

      • sunbytes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        There’s problems with the eu ones too. I barely used them anyway before but did test after installing and it errored out.

        Though yeah that could have just been google pay, now i think about it…

    • OpenPassageways@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      NFC pay is not ubiquitous enough in my area so I use a phone case that has room for cards. I still need to carry a physical health insurance card and a physical ID as well so my wallet case is not going away. I actually bought a pixel 9 instead of 10 just because my favorite wallet case was available.

      I’m considering just getting a Garmin watch that I keep disconnected from my phone to use for NFC pay. Seems like I would be able to set up my cards in Garmin Pay app and then just disconnect it.

        • OpenPassageways@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          The Garmin vivoactive 5 is the one I was considering since it seems relatively affordable and apparently once the card is on the watch through the Garmin Pay app then it works without the phone being connected.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Will Motorola have support for eSIMs? Will Google Pay work? … I’m not making judgments on whether they should, but asking about practical considerations.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love graphene, but I hope they’re planning to also roll out some very strong stock software - or else this will make for a very rough first impression on a large audience of normies and hurt graphene’s long run chance of success. The camera, gallery, and app store in particular will not come up to many users’ standards.

    • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      155
      ·
      7 days ago

      My impression from the article is that the Motorola phones ship with default Android, but flashing to GrapheneOS is officially supported. So it would only be people who would be flashing GrapheneOS anyway.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah by “switch to” they probably do mean flash. I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones but maybe that’s a later phase.

        • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones

          They do. They say it in their roadmap:

          Hardware and firmware security are core parts of the project, but it’s currently limited to research and submitting suggestions and bug reports upstream. In the long term, the project will need to move into the hardware space.

          https://grapheneos.org/faq#roadmap

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 days ago

          Would you trust a pre-flashed phone though?

          I guess with GOS they have integrity checkers.

          • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            At least for right now I would trust one that had the backing of the Graphene devs. Them and Signal are probably the two most rock solid trust sources right now. (Of course this must constantly be reevaluated)

        • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          There are some third party vendors online that ship pre-flashed GrapheneOS phones iirc, but I don’t believe there has ever been on with it factory installed.

            • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              7 days ago

              I agree, you should always flash it yourself. Though GrapheneOS does have the Auditor app to attest the integrity of the operating system against another GrapheneOS device. It’s always going to be best practice to do it yourself, however.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There are some really talented people working on the camera systems for Apple and Google etc. what I don’t get is surely there are some equally talented engineers (in image processing) who love open source so why aren’t they working on an open source camera platform?

      It seems an itch that’s not getting scratched.

      • Ernest@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 days ago

        idk if this is the case here but on a firmware level, interfacing with these camera chips almost always requires an NDA that they’ll only sign with very large minimum orders

        • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 days ago

          This is also why open source wearables can’t have the best PPG heart rate/SPO2 tracking.

          There are only about 4 PPG analog front ends still in production that don’t require an NDA and the Max86141 is the only one worth anything it seems.

          You can’t do analog front ends with any small FPGAs that I know of and it is simply to large to do it (well, at least) on a small wearable with discrete components.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Motorola should be able to lead them into the right direction for this. Moto controls their own drivers and while i don’t know, i don’t expect they’re using stock android camera, they can probably just provide the camera app to graphene

    • ChanchoManco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah the signature phones cost around $1.500 here in my country, my budget is $400 tops, no way I can afford that, my hopes are lost.

    • pjusk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      iirc, as of right now, its only the expensive processors that meet the security standards GrapheneOS has. Therefore only being available in the future high-end Motorola phones.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      What are the odds that it filters down?

      I’ll pick up a cheap android and put Lineage on it before I buy another flagship phone.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I was looking at the lowest end pixel for Graphene (Pixel 7) and they are still nearly $400 on the aftermarket. It’s insane.

      • RaisinCrazyFool@kopitalk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Damn, the market’s crazy. You could get a Pixel 7 brand new, unlocked, for less than $400 when it was still current, 3 years ago.

        The only things Pixels have going for them are the aggressive sales and GrapheneOS.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 days ago

        Where are you looking? I see Pixel 8s, used and unlocked, on ebay for $200-300.

      • excursion22@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I got a 7 Pro around 6 months ago for $280 CAD. Surely there are other less expensive sources you could find.

      • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Anecdotally I bought a used pixel 9a last year for ~$350, could be regional or due to ongoing inflation though

        • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          I bought a new in box old stock Pixel 9a for $350 USD a couple months ago from eBay. This was just before that Cop City protestor gave a duress password to border patrol, I wonder if that caused a bit of a spike in demand for old Pixels?

        • zewm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m guessing inflation and the tech related bullshit. Everyone marking shit up.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      I got a deal on a new 9 from my carrier for $5 a month for 24 months.

      $120 CAD.

      But, in canada, the phones come carrier unlocked and had no issue flashing it. Though i only ever powered it on once before it was flashed - to turn on oem unlocking. The sim was not used until then. So it didn’t do any auto downloads that might have caused a problem.

      Long short: you can find them cheap if you look.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        What is your plan price though. I see lots of thee x a month for phone but they also have a really high base price.

        • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          In canada it’s all high. But i have 120GB data, unlimited calling and text in north America, free roaming, for 45$/mo

          So my bill is 50 + tax.

          I’ve had the phone for lver a year now.