• Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lmao. Your unflinting biological bias is hilarious. Even with the qualifier that is absurd

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re right that it’s nowhere near 100% like I suggested. But ya, I wear that bias with pride.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I get your bias, but in this instance the human experts he’d be listening to would be health insurance lobbyists, not people who care about others’ health. ChatGPT, which is obviously incapable of feeling compassion, may very well have more compassion for human life compared to those.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Until those medical lobbyists pay OpenAI to make chatgpt give biased advice

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that he’d be listening to only lobbyists. Theoretically, one could surround themselves with a diverse group of actual experts.