Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoWait, why is the White House using Starlink to ‘improve Wi-Fi’?www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1388arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1384arrow-down1external-linkWait, why is the White House using Starlink to ‘improve Wi-Fi’?www.theverge.comTony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square50linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareCousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agoDon’t forget the latency and QoS that’ll probably be done haphazardly limiting everyone to just a sliver of the total available bandwidth.
minus-squareslaneesh_is_right@lemmy.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoI don’t thing latecy is a problem when you only use it to watch child porn
minus-squareCousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoRegardless of what it’s being used for, sending data to low orbit rather than across fiber optic will always have more latency.
Don’t forget the latency and QoS that’ll probably be done haphazardly limiting everyone to just a sliver of the total available bandwidth.
I don’t thing latecy is a problem when you only use it to watch child porn
Regardless of what it’s being used for, sending data to low orbit rather than across fiber optic will always have more latency.