Just another form of loophole abuse.

I always thought sticking with fossil fuels was dumb even by their standards. Like, “like if you’re goal is isolationism, why cling to something that requires external sources?”

I was just trying to make a simple point, he kept repeating himself, and I asked a new question. Do what you want with that.

Yes it matters. If you’re trying to please one community, why post the AP article to the others? Or your own?

Do the conservative communities (including the one you mod) think the same?

Thank you. Means a lot.

You should be able to figure out that’s a duplicate on your own. It’s literately the same article.

Your Newsweek post from earlier cited AP.

Oh, I know. But this isn’t the first time I’ve dealt with questionable headlines.

Corrected. Honestly wasn’t really about the headline myself.

You already posted this.

Florida is toast.

This is coming from the guy who literately waved a fucking chainsaw up at CPAC.

I know, right? Just skip straight to the point.

“Might not be”? Understatement of the century.

Starlink is the purest definition of “space junk.”

A laundry list

But they’ll happily censor everything else.

She had AI write her script.