• masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    “Party elites” aren’t a class.

    Gee… Fidel’s little brother is worth a sweet $100 million, eh? Not too shabby for such a “classless” person. I wonder how all the other party elites are doing?

    you’re making a fundamental error.

    No, tankie… it doesn’t look like I am.

    Communism isn’t redundant because Cuba still has class,

    Oh, really? You don’t say?

    that would be phased out over time.

    Lol!

    in a transitional state between capitalism and communism,

    Is that why they legalised private property in their new constitution?

    Your obsession with defining socialism as a “pure” system is utterly unconvincing,

    Requiring that socialism meet the most basic requirement of socialism in order to be called socialism is a very simple test, tankie.

    The hollowness of your ideology is now mere historical record.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Let me echo you here:

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - and you have provided zero.

      Tabloid media trying to conflate publicly owned assets in Cuba as constituting Fidel and Raul’s net worth is bargain bin red scare nonsense.

      Requiring that socialism meet the most basic requirement of socialism in order to be called socialism is a very simple test, tankie.

      The most basic requirements of socialism are that the working class is in control of the state, and public ownership is the princiole aspect of the economy. It’s qualitatively different from capitalist economies, where capitalists are in charge of the state and private ownership is the principle aspect of the economy. Pretending a worker-run, publicly owned economy is capitalist all the way until they reach communism is absurd.

      Deeply unserious.

      • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Tabloid media trying to conflate publicly owned assets

        Really? So Cuba’s party elites live like the rest of Cuba’s working class, eh?

        The most basic requirements of socialism are that the working class is in control of the state, means of production.

        FTFY.

        No ifs, tankie.

        No buts.

        No ands.

        Deeply unserious.

        As unserious as a (supposed) “socialist” that despises the working class?

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Socialism isn’t equalitarianism. In Cuba, the working classes do control the means of production and the state. Continuing to pretend I “despise the working class” because I support real, existing worker power and don’t belittle their protracted struggle to protect it isn’t convincing anyone.

          • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Socialism isn’t equalitarianism

            Which part of this…

            The most basic requirements of socialism are that the working class is in control of the state, means of production.

            …contains the term “equalitarianism,” tankie?

            In Cuba, the working classes do control the means of production and the state.

            Do tell… why do these (supposedly) “classless” party elites you worship so much take to capitalism like ducks to water as soon as they get the chance?

            Continuing to pretend I “despise the working class”

            Again… why do you despise the working class?

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              The bit where you implied the existence of inequality meant the existence of class. The party is made up of the working classes, they are not classless. They aren’t a distinct class, but instead a part of the working classes. Instituting small amounts of controlled private property in order to help with their tourism industry is not “taking to capitalism like ducks to water as soon as they get the chance,” Cuba has been socialist for a long time and the recent private concessions are due to struggles from the blockade.

              I love the working class, that’s why I support the working classes that have taken power around the world and direct the economy to suit the needs of the people, rather than redefine words and imagine an ever-purer and ever-nonexistent version of socialism in my head to compare them to.

              • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                existence of inequality meant the existence of class.

                Again - which part of this…

                The most basic requirements of socialism are that the working class is in control of the state, means of production.

                …contains the term “equalitarianism,” tankie?

                Do tell, tankie… how does this inequality exist if the working class are in control of the means of production?

                Your concept of socialism is anti-socialist.

                Why should we treat you any different from all the other anti-socialists?

                The party is made up of the working classes,

                Oh really? These party elites you simp for are mere members of the working class, eh tankie?

                When it comes to modernising feudal power relations for secular industrialisation you Marxist-Leninists have outdone liberal capitalists by every metric except longevity.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Your point on there being some level of inequality in Cuba is basically a point about equalitarianism. The inequality exists because Cuba is a very poor country, and as such there is uneven development and distribution, even if tje working classes are in power. Yes, the PCC is a working class party.

                  You have no points, you just redefine words and hurl petty insults. It’s painfully boring, especially considering your line of logic is being used right now to justify bombing Venezuela. You despise the working class and the power it builds as it actually exists in real life, while you continue to paint an ever purer vision in your head to beat the global south with like a club. You’re an imperialist first and foremost.

                  • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    The inequality exists because Cuba is a very poor country

                    Right, right… it has absolutely nothing to do with the existence of a party elite that takes care of itself first.

                    Riiiiight.

                    You have no points,

                    Again… why do you despise the working class, tankie?