edit: you to your

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That doesn’t seem like a photo that would break any rules. It’s suggestive, but nothing worse than that.

      • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        That isn’t the point, though. The absurdity here is that content creators have to censor their language to such an absurd degree so as not to offend advertisers, but then the platform itself can just turn around and post borderline soft-core porn. It’s just more hypocrisy from those “Think of the Children!” pearl-clutchers.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          You seem to believe that the platform is intentionally posting soft-core porn.

          • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 days ago

            You seem to be trying to stir up some sort of argument. It’s an obvious example of double standards. I don’t know what else to tell you.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              How so? Do advertisers not get suspended or banned if they post soft-core porn?