edit: you to your

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That doesn’t seem like a photo that would break any rules. It’s suggestive, but nothing worse than that.

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      That isn’t the point, though. The absurdity here is that content creators have to censor their language to such an absurd degree so as not to offend advertisers, but then the platform itself can just turn around and post borderline soft-core porn. It’s just more hypocrisy from those “Think of the Children!” pearl-clutchers.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        You seem to believe that the platform is intentionally posting soft-core porn.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          You seem to be trying to stir up some sort of argument. It’s an obvious example of double standards. I don’t know what else to tell you.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            How so? Do advertisers not get suspended or banned if they post soft-core porn?