Liberalism is when you believe in voting against fascism to lessen the burdens on engaging in actual leftist action, I guess.
Extremely dire turbolib statement here, RIP
Liberalism is when you believe in voting against fascism to lessen the burdens on engaging in actual leftist action, I guess.
Extremely dire turbolib statement here, RIP
I’m not on the side of Israel and supporting the Zionist cause. But when there are two options, you pick the less bad of the two. It’s not fucking rocket science.
The Soviets in WW2 were committing genocide. Yet the question of winning the Second World War depended on cooperation with the Soviets.
With the same mindset that supporting literal genocidaires - the Soviets - was necessary to stop a worse outcome - the Nazis - so too was this past election. We had our choice of supporting the liberal coalition candidate, or the fascist coalition candidate. And all too many people decided they’d sooner see the Nazis win than side with genocidaires - despite the fact that siding ‘against’ the genocidaires did nothing to actually reduce the genocide being done - and, in fact, actually intensified the genocide you were supposedly protesting against.
Harm reduction is an explicit rejection of the idea that, in a tight situation, supporting the less-bad option is dedication to their cause. It is only supporting the less-bad option being the one to result. A vote takes, for most, an hour of your time, twice every two years. Most people spend more time fucking jacking off. If that’s too much strain for you to save the lives of literal millions, you’re a fucking LARPer, not someone who’s interested in the welfare of marginalized groups oppressed by state power.
But if you’re more interested in spiritualist, self-centered interpretations of politics, rather than political action as a way of improving lives and reducing harm, well, that kind of LARPers mindset is naturally geared against that very simple idea that a vote isn’t a love letter. Who cares about outcomes? You have to keep your internal karma meter positive, or some stupid shit like that.
Sorry that you think inaction in support of the worse option is absolution?
I love how you have framed a relationship between two allies of neccessity who were in the wake of a world war going to become superpowers as if it is equitable to a client state of a superpower committing genocide on its peoples internally while the superpower handed them essentially unlimited weapons and ran diplomatic cover for it while pretending to try to stop it.
You are clearly in denial and it shows.
The Palestinian Genocide is not a war, it is a genocide.
I’m sorry, is there something wrong with framing WW2 as dependent on the cooperation of the Western Allies with the Soviets?
… no, genius. I’m comparing siding with genocidal liberals against fascists to siding with genocidal Soviets against fascists.
Try rereading it.
I’m sorry, where do you think I said otherwise?
Fuck’s sake. I literally and explicitly called the current liberal position as supporting genocide.
Do you just… make up shit in your head instead of reading whatever it is you’re supposedly replying to?
I did and it just made less sense in terms of constructing a coherent intellectual argument.
Okay, buddy.