• theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re supposed to admit to your actions openly for civil disobedience. It gives you standing to challenge and opportunity to drag things to light. Even now, everyone being tried for this creates headlines that unattributed destruction does not

      At higher levels, it can also clog the justice system and make it expensive to continue targeted policies

      Without all that, it’s just property destruction. Flock could probably have examples made of people caught (seeing as somehow they seem able to sidestep the law), but that frames the issue in a better way for flock

      Taking the justice system head on is just a much more effective method of forcing change… Granted at a personal cost, although getting caught by the big brother machines themselves seems likely

      Or it could be for political advantage…I mean, the cameras are wildly unpopular and badasses who cut (or shoot) through red tape are very much currently in style

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Counterpoint - that’s ineffective messaging. It doesn’t win over people not already on board

          Instead, if you focus on concrete material conditions, like affordability and healthcare, nearly everyone agrees. Or in the case of flock, you roll it in with datacenters and the AI bubble in general

          Winning under a banner of socialism is impractical, but socialist policies are rapidly rising in popularity across the board. If it goes down easier calling it progressivism, who cares? I just want good things