• Eristalis@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As above. This was a global crisis. The issues were not caused by the Republican party, nor by the Democrats, nor by anyone even in America! I know… Imagine a thing happening that isn’t directly to do with America!

    A nasty virus spread throughout the world. Governments and scientists didn’t know what to do. They rushed to make policies to deal with it, within the crappy, corrupt political systems that all countries have. Most came up with a mostly crappy response, mostly dictated by corporate lobbies and electioneering, like every other policy they’ve ever come up with. Lots of people died. Lots more than would have if everything had been done perfectly, but we don’t live in such a world and we would no more have if the Democrats were in charge.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Nobody is angry at the republicans for causing the pandemic.

      Democrats are angry that republicans (specifically under Trump) fucked up the pandemic response and at least indirectly- but also frequently directly- killed hundreds of thousands of the millions of dead Americans.

      Imagine not being angry at that.

      For example, Trump resisted lockdowns because rich people didn’t want to lose money. This lead to greater spread, which lead to a larger surge which lead to overwhelmed ICUs and deciding who got ventilators and who didn’t.

      While Trump was looting medical resources exactly like ventilators and sending them to his bestie, Putin.

      Fuck you for spreading trump apologia.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As above. This was a global crisis. The issues were not caused by the Republican party, nor by the Democrats, nor by anyone even in America! I know… Imagine a thing happening that isn’t directly to do with America!

      Welll there were some people trying to prevent lockdowns from being enacted, some people suggesting Ivermectin and bleach as cures or prevention for COVID, etc…

      Different countries had very different outcomes and while the US wasn’t the worst, it could’ve been a lot better if a certain party hadn’t hampered any effort at improving the situation.

      • Eristalis@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Sure. But there are also some scientists who think the lockdown didn’t work, or only work really fast and hard. Or only work in dense populations but are useless in sparse ones. The Democrats don’t have a monopoly on truth, they’re not omniscient. They just had a different idea of how they wanted to respond based (like every other politician) on what they thought would sell well to their electorate.

        Who knows what they word have actually done in power. I hate to break it to you, but politicians lie - it’s kind of their job.

        • hr_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          A bit unfortunate you’re getting down voted for a more nuanced take. The jury is still out on large scale lockdowns. China managed to control the spread by aggressive contact tracing and testing, resorting to lockdowns as last resort. And it worked fairly well for some time.