• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    196
    ·
    3 days ago

    This wasn’t the revolutionary part about Newton’s conception of inertia. It was the counterpart: that an object in motion will tend to keep going forever unless acted upon by a force. This was pretty staggering in a world where an arrow fired from a bow (below escape velocity, you snitty little pedants) will slow down and fall to the ground as though getting tired on its own.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      3 days ago

      The prevailing theory in Europe at time was still Aristotle’s idea that a force was necessary for objects to remain in motion. The theories on how an arrow or any other thrown object remained in motion involved an impromptu Rube Goldberg contraption involving the object and the atmosphere.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        a force was necessary for objects to remain in motion.

        Pretty much every science fiction film too. With very few notable exceptions.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You picked the wrong pedants. Bows are shot, not fired