"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agoHorrorlemmy.worldimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageHorrorlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareNoobnarski@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 days agoI’m pretty sure scientists back then could have told you that these balloons are too small. The person(s) who drew that picture most likely wasn’t a scientist, which is why it looks how it looks.
minus-squareMeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 days agoMaybe they thought we’d have discovered/created new elements by now that could do this.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoHalf hydrogen! Or the rare molecule, puffy air.
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 days agoWell, if we used a pure vacuum, you’d only get about 17% more efficiency than just using helium I think
I’m pretty sure scientists back then could have told you that these balloons are too small. The person(s) who drew that picture most likely wasn’t a scientist, which is why it looks how it looks.
Maybe they thought we’d have discovered/created new elements by now that could do this.
Half hydrogen! Or the rare molecule, puffy air.
Well, if we used a pure vacuum, you’d only get about 17% more efficiency than just using helium I think