• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            you mean… sidewalks? because those are very clearly sidewalks; as they are narrow, made of concrete, and there’s absolutely no sign that bikes are allowed or were considered in the design.

            I mean just look at the crossings, those are explicitly pedestrian crossings lol.

            • GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Not at all, pedestrians roadways.

              We bicyclist cannot accept less, I live where yes, sidewalks are rare & available in more quality in the nearest cities, but they are minimum & not wide enough. We must demand better.

              Our (I assume) country is more wealthy, than Scandinavian countries, yet they have better separation & whole roadways converted for non-motorized cyclist & can be used to get to more place, where I live such roadway is 15-miles away, with traffic from my home it takes 45-Mins. to get to it & it only goes along side US1 & connects to Metrorail’s first Southern Station & Metrobus station. I think letting other non-motorized ways for pedestrians to get around is okay.