• Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 days ago

      This one looks cool, and I think that’s its biggest problem. It’s clearly a massive, man-made structure with no obvious purpose, yet with striking visual impact. To the hypothetical future civilization that is unaware of the dangerous nuclear waste, it basically begs to be investigated.

          • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Oh, I meant it more in the sense how archeologists/historians often say something was used for some religious or ritual purposes when they can’t come up with a better explanation. See for example Stonehenge or roman dodecahedrons. There was also the idea for an atomic priesthood which would be charged with keeping the knowledge about nuclear waste sites.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              At least with Stonehenge it makes sense to group it in with religious worship of some type since it matches known human actions both historical and modern. As for Roman dodecahedron my money is still on it just being a nick nack, an expensive one but a nick nack none the less.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Bro of course Excalibur is under the field of death. Where else would you hide something so powerful?

      Hop in, let’s go