• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    At least physical land is an inherently non-fungible thing, while NFTs are only a non-fungible piece of code people claim ties to something else of value.

    Well its really the land “deed” you own, which is entirely fungible (though managed as a non-fungible item through state enforced violence).

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The NFT is a non-fungible paper that says “you own this thing everyone can use”, and as soon as you make that thing private, the NFT instantly loses its value.

      A land deed is a “non-fungible” paper that says “you own this thing everyone can use”, and as soon as you make that thing private, the deed massively appreciates in value.

    • lunardroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, yes, land is managed through state enforced violence but also the laws of physics. There’s only so much that can fit on an area of land. If I build a house that takes up the full extent of the property, then nobody else can use the land for, say, a parking lot without me removing my house first. Every bit of land used/bought is a reduction in the amount of land left to buy. But a JPG can have unlimited copies made of it, providing unlimited storage. If I make a copy of a NFT image, I don’t deprive the owner of the image. If I buy a piece of land and use it, I’m kind of depriving others from use of that land.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The violence is optional and it also need not be the state itself supplying the violence, depending on the jurisdiction.