After seeing a megathread praising Mao Zedong, an actual mass killer, and a post about a guy saying “99% of westerners are 100000000000% sure they know what happened in ‘Tiny Man Square’ […] the reasons for this are complex and involve propaganda […],” I am genuinely curious what leads people to this belief system. Even if propaganda is involved when it comes to Tiananmen Square, it doesn’t change the atrocities that were/are committed everywhere else in China.
I am all for letting people believe what they want but I am lost on why one would deliberately praise any authoritarian system this hard.
Can someone please help me understand why this is such a large and prominent community? How have these ideals garnered such a following outside of China?
EDIT: Thank you to everyone who has responded! This thread has been very insightful :)
Go for it.
Last question homie, what dafuq is a tankie?
I’ve gotten loads of answers that pretty much describe them as leftist authoritarians.
I also read you might be one. So, in your own words. What that?
It’s just a pejorative for those that recognize the legitimacy of socialist states as they exist in the real world, and support them.
Can I ask you your feelings on authoritarianism?
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm
Gunna be real though. I have a hard time reading things like this in my phone.
I’m traveling currently, but I promise I will read this when I get home!
Smort! Linking an article instead of trying to explain it to my dumb ass.
I think it’s good for the working classes to wield the state against capitalists, fascists, landlords, sabateurs, etc. and a bad thing for those groups to wield state power against the working classes.
And whats your opinion on Russia invading Ukraine?
I think it’s bad that the west installed a Banderite regime in 2014, and that said Banderite regime killed 13,000 civilians in Donetsk and Luhansk for seceding from the new far-right government. The whole war was avoidable, and the best way for it to end is for Kiev to cede the 4 oblasts that already voted to join the Russian Federation, that way Ukrainians don’t have to die for wealthy US capitalists and Ukrainian compradors and the people of the Donbass can exist in peace in the country they voted to join.
I’m not cowbee but I’ll just say that “tankie” is pretty much a meaningless word. It’s like how conservatives call everything they don’t like “woke” even when it’s other conservatives. “Tankie” basically just means “someone on the left that I disagree with”
It used to refer to a group of communists in Britain who didn’t condemn Khrushchev for sending in tanks to suppress right wing protests in Hungary. Later it became a general term for anyone who had a positive opinion of the USSR. Later it just became a catch-all term for leftists (including anarchists) but nowadays it can even include liberals. It’s kinda meaningless.
Hey! Another name I recognize(but from much earlier today)
I’m honestly(heart to sky) not trying to start an argument, as much as an honest conversation.
What are your feelings on the Tiananman square incident?
I think the government made a mistake allowing the student protests to reach the point that they reached and they probably should’ve cracked down sooner to avoid the number of deaths that ended up happening. JSYK in the Tiananmen square itself there was a peaceful evacuation in June 4 1989, so strictly speaking nothing too newsworthy happened. The actual fighting between protesters and the police/army happened in the streets surrounding the square and that’s where a lot of people were killed. There’s been some useful master-posts on Lemmy explaining the specifics of what went down using accounts from journalists who were in Beijing at that time, let me see if I find them.
Edit: https://hexbear.net/comment/5032963
Currently sorting through the link you provided, but I’m going to be honest I’m intoxicated so it won’t going to be quick.
I’ll read through the posts, but can you provide me with an abridged overview until then?
In the week leading up to the evacuation there had been some clashes between protesters and the police. The protesters had been very violent toward the unarmed police, including a few killings and arson of police vehicles (there’s at least 2 images of police officers being burned alive in the days before the evacuation). To my knowledge there isn’t any evidence that the police had reciprocated in any notable way at this point. In the 4th of June the government responded to the killings by sending in the PLA to evacuate the protests, but because the protesters were pretty violent at this point it resulted in a lot of fighting, leaving a few hundred people dead over the next couple of days (with a roughly even split of protesters and soldiers/police killed).
Real talk homie, there is no way you actually believe this‽
Edit: real talk! You think the police(who have a monopoly on violence) didn’t come armed?
Again I’m not trying to antagonize you! You seemed well informed! But you can’t believe that honestly.
A lot of countries have unarmed police, that’s just how it is in much of the world. It’s not just a Chinese thing.
And yeah they still have a monopoly on violence and their presence is supposed to be intimidating. That’s a fair point and someone in the thread I linked brought it up. But having been to protests myself, I think it can usually be a good thing to have the police around because (at least ostensibly, the opposite of this can be true) they should protect the people protesting from anyone who comes up and tries to harm them. In a utopian society maybe there wouldn’t be cops at all, in a slightly less utopian one I think cops without guns that protect you at a protest isn’t a horrible compromise.
It’s an easily verifiable fact that UK police patrol without firearms regularly, idk why you think other countries can’t do the same. From an oversight perspective it’s a really simple way to reduce the risk of police shootings, and it saves a lot of money on equipment and ammo.
Thanks for an honest answer.
Can I ask you about your feelings on the classic picture of the dude standing in front of a line of tanks with his hand up in the “stop” gesture?
I think the full video shows that the driver of the tank displayed a lot of patience and the whole situation could’ve been a lot uglier if the tank had done anything about the guy climbing on it.
Homie, I’m going to be real with you. That looks like he jumped on the tank and then back down.
I was asking you about the whole him being run over moment.
When did he get run over?
Edit: https://youtu.be/GRb4VY2dU4c I said I linked the full video earlier but this one actually shows some random civilians showing up and escorting the guy away.